dqx

6 ms·

1.
by dqx 5y ago
Study? You're hoping for a peer-reviewed science journal that published an article on who's offended by Joe Rogan? The original claim was that the total number of people still offended by COVID-victim Joe Rogan's comments was
2.
by dqx 5y ago
Thank you for agreeing, many (a word you used first) people are still upset about Rogan's comments, disproving your point that "none" are. If you have anything but blind speculation you're going on, feel free to provid
3.
by dqx 5y ago
> FAKE NEWS Interesting opinion, it doesn't change the fact that many people are still mad about Rogan's comments. https://consequence.net/2021/10/team-terf-dave-chappelle/ https://w
4.
by dqx 5y ago
Joe Rogan's comments keep coming up in the context of discussion of this issue in recent news; many people are still mad. You've picked a poor example. https://www.salon.com/2021/10/18/tucker-carls
5.
by dqx 5y ago
Yeah, getting beaten in the head by a violent mob was probably unrelated to the officer's stroke. You're actually THAT gullible...luckily the medical examiner isn't. Severe head trauma was unrelated to the suicides of the off
6.
by dqx 5y ago
I agree, Trump supporters staged an armed, violent riot at the US Capitol. If you're so out of the loop you haven't seen the hours and hours of footage and social media evidence that shows that the vast majority of attendees were
7.
by dqx 5y ago
What do you mean by "free speech?" "Unmoderated?" "Uncensored?" "Speech not limited by the government?" In the US "hate speech" is legally protected as free speech (although hate speech ha
8.
by dqx 5y ago
Yep, we got a great idea of his political acumen handling the pandemic response.
9.
by dqx 5y ago
1. The vast majority were part of the far-right organizations, it was organized by far-right organizations. We have the evidence, we have their communications, they were stupid enough to post everything on social media, we have the video of
10.
by dqx 5y ago
> Can you source this Trump being a very rich business leader with a great deal of political influence? Well, yeah I can. https://libn.com/2016/09/15/taking-a-peek-at-trumps-foundati... > why you'r
11.
by dqx 5y ago
I agree, most of the violent rioters were armed. It is well documented that organizers had to encourage attendees to leave their guns at home or in their cars (as you mentioned, several were arrested with firearms in their cars on their way
12.
by dqx 5y ago
Yes I know. Trump was elected because he was an oligarch, not because of his political experience. Reagan had (comparatively) none of the wealth and real political experience at the federal level. He was not an oligarch.
13.
by dqx 5y ago
Thanks for providing evidence of a capitol rioter carrying a firearm. No True Scotsman I guess. Most of the rioters were armed. There are a couple videos of the riot if you don't believe me. You're moving the goals posts so that b
14.
by dqx 5y ago
Makes you wonder why congressman Mo Brooks (R-Alabama) wore body armor to the riot, huh? Maybe to protect against the stun guns, pepper spray, baseball bats and pipe bombs? 14 suspects in the attack are facing federal charges related to bri
15.
by dqx 5y ago
Agreed, he was an oligarch, and then was democratically elected, but who's to say what Brett "Devil’s Triangle" Kavanaugh will do in the face of a motivated majority?
16.
by dqx 5y ago
5 deaths and at least 138 police officers injured. I'd argue Trump's Capitol riot was more dramatic. It even resulted in more suicides.
17.
by dqx 5y ago
He was an oligarch, and then was democratically elected. His supreme court appointees will continue to enforce his policies for the rest of their lives. > no system of government can prevent bad actors Everything's the same! So cryp
18.
by dqx 5y ago
Reagan was a former governor whose net worth paled in comparison to Trump's. He was not an oligarch.
19.
by dqx 5y ago
How effective were the traditional means of removing oligarchs? The US just elected a game show host president 4 years ago.
20.
by dqx 5y ago
> Snopes is a poor fact checker Is there a single fact in the linked Snopes article that is incorrect?
21.
by dqx 5y ago
Ban...what? People wearing glasses? Taking photos in places where people don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy?
22.
by dqx 5y ago
Graphic design
23.
by dqx 5y ago
No, the USPS has the Congressional monopoly on the delivery of non-urgent letters and delivery direct to mailboxes at residential and commercial locations. They specifically do not have any competition in those cases.
24.
by dqx 5y ago
0 discussion of any new features in Nano-5.7 (the topic of the post)
25.
by dqx 5y ago
Strongly worded? Trite clichés aren't very strong.
26.
by dqx 5y ago
...and the content is being policed, not the thoughts. "All content is just thoughts, conveyed" is a meaningless slippery slope.
27.
by dqx 5y ago
Thoughtcrime? It's content they are preventing, not thoughts.