5 ms·

Joe Rogan's comments keep coming up in the context of discussion of this issue in recent news; many people are still mad. You've picked a poor example. https:/

by dqx 5y ago

Joe Rogan's comments keep coming up in the context of discussion of this issue in recent news; many people are still mad. You've picked a poor example. https://www.salon.com/2021/10/18/tucker-carlson-joe-rogan-and-the-proud-boys-how-the-fragility-of-the-male-ego-fuels-the-far-right/ https://www.salon.com/2021/10/18/tucker-carlson-joe-rogan-an...

staysafeanon 5y ago
Salon is not news, it's yellow journalism.
- dqx 5y ago
  > FAKE NEWS Interesting opinion, it doesn't change the fact that many people are still mad about Rogan's comments. https://consequence.net/2021/10/team-terf-dave-chappelle/ https://consequence.net/2021/10/team-terf-dave-chappelle/ https://www.foxnews.com/media/the-view-hosts-clash-joe-rogan-transphobic-islamophobic-racist-things https://www.foxnews.com/media/the-view-hosts-clash-joe-rogan...
  - refenestrator 5y ago
    "Many" people is a weasel word, a couple dozen could qualify. It's only an issue for the media-addicted and those who fill airtime for a living.
    - dqx 5y ago
      Thank you for agreeing, many (a word you used first) people are still upset about Rogan's comments, disproving your point that "none" are. If you have anything but blind speculation you're going on, feel free to provide it!
  - staysafeanon 5y ago
    >FAKE NEWS You seriously reply with two more links to yellow journalism. I can't tell if you're trolling or not, but that's three strikes, you're out.
    - dqx 5y ago
      I was pretty sure you wouldn't have any criticism more nuanced than "FAKE NEWS," but it's nice to see it confirmed. I provided a few links because you're apparently unable to use search engines. If you were, you'd understand that people haven't forgotten Rogan's comments.
      - staysafeanon 5y ago
        >I was pretty sure you wouldn't have any criticism more nuanced than "FAKE NEWS," but it's nice to see it confirmed. And as usual, you're wrong. You still haven't linked any study or non-yellow journalism that tries to objectively capture how "many" people are still mad at Joe Rogan. >I provided a few links because you're apparently unable to use search engines. A few links to fake news outposts that did not support your claim whatsoever. If you can't find a legitimate claim to your original statement, it can be dismissed outright. You still haven't found anything, and so you're claims are dismissed.
        dqx 5y ago
        Study? You're hoping for a peer-reviewed science journal that published an article on who's offended by Joe Rogan? The original claim was that the total number of people still offended by COVID-victim Joe Rogan's comments was "none." No evidence supports that claim, so we can dismiss it outright, like you said. I've posted evidence to support mine, your defense is a thought-terminating cliché coined by a game show host.
        deleted 5y ago
        [deleted]
        staysafeanon 5y ago
        >Study? You're hoping for a peer-reviewed science journal that published an article on who's offended by Joe Rogan? Oh, so you have nothing. Thanks for agreeing with me. Your points dismissed. >The original claim was that the total number of people still offended by COVID-victim Joe Rogan's comments was "none." Not my nor your claim. Stop shifting goal posts. >I've posted evidence to support mine Wrong, you've posted none such thing, as I have proven above. You still haven't supplied evidence to support your claim. >your defense is a thought-terminating cliché coined by a game show host. Yellow journalism predates the birth of Trump, wrong again.

by dqx 5y ago

staysafeanon 5y ago

Salon is not news, it's yellow journalism.

dqx 5y ago
> FAKE NEWS Interesting opinion, it doesn't change the fact that many people are still mad about Rogan's comments. https://consequence.net/2021/10/team-terf-dave-chappelle/ https://consequence.net/2021/10/team-terf-dave-chappelle/ https://www.foxnews.com/media/the-view-hosts-clash-joe-rogan-transphobic-islamophobic-racist-things https://www.foxnews.com/media/the-view-hosts-clash-joe-rogan...
- refenestrator 5y ago
  "Many" people is a weasel word, a couple dozen could qualify. It's only an issue for the media-addicted and those who fill airtime for a living.
  - dqx 5y ago
    Thank you for agreeing, many (a word you used first) people are still upset about Rogan's comments, disproving your point that "none" are. If you have anything but blind speculation you're going on, feel free to provide it!
- staysafeanon 5y ago
  >FAKE NEWS You seriously reply with two more links to yellow journalism. I can't tell if you're trolling or not, but that's three strikes, you're out.
  - dqx 5y ago
    I was pretty sure you wouldn't have any criticism more nuanced than "FAKE NEWS," but it's nice to see it confirmed. I provided a few links because you're apparently unable to use search engines. If you were, you'd understand that people haven't forgotten Rogan's comments.
    - staysafeanon 5y ago
      >I was pretty sure you wouldn't have any criticism more nuanced than "FAKE NEWS," but it's nice to see it confirmed. And as usual, you're wrong. You still haven't linked any study or non-yellow journalism that tries to objectively capture how "many" people are still mad at Joe Rogan. >I provided a few links because you're apparently unable to use search engines. A few links to fake news outposts that did not support your claim whatsoever. If you can't find a legitimate claim to your original statement, it can be dismissed outright. You still haven't found anything, and so you're claims are dismissed.
      - dqx 5y ago
        Study? You're hoping for a peer-reviewed science journal that published an article on who's offended by Joe Rogan? The original claim was that the total number of people still offended by COVID-victim Joe Rogan's comments was "none." No evidence supports that claim, so we can dismiss it outright, like you said. I've posted evidence to support mine, your defense is a thought-terminating cliché coined by a game show host.
        deleted 5y ago
        [deleted]
        staysafeanon 5y ago
        >Study? You're hoping for a peer-reviewed science journal that published an article on who's offended by Joe Rogan? Oh, so you have nothing. Thanks for agreeing with me. Your points dismissed. >The original claim was that the total number of people still offended by COVID-victim Joe Rogan's comments was "none." Not my nor your claim. Stop shifting goal posts. >I've posted evidence to support mine Wrong, you've posted none such thing, as I have proven above. You still haven't supplied evidence to support your claim. >your defense is a thought-terminating cliché coined by a game show host. Yellow journalism predates the birth of Trump, wrong again.