Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
NotTameAntelope
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Brilliant work, and the researcher involved seems quite humble, despite her impressive discovery. Where in the world is Carmen Sandi’s ego?
2.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Instantiate a new object of the class with the JSON as arguments, is one way. I’ve built a bunch of these systems, keeping your data separate solves a lot of future problems.
3.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
So inaction can't ever be selfish?
4.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
"It is possible to commit no mistakes [driving] and still lose. That is not a weakness; that is life."
5.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Because people understand that their perspective might be incomplete or wrong, and/or the consequences of failure are reversible. People also understand that "correctness" is often subjective and not boolean in nature, so ins
6.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Yeah, well the obvious answer is that $200 < $600, so the line must be somewhere between $200 and $600.
7.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
What is your opinion on whether or not Russia is justified in its invasion of Ukraine?
8.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
What is your opinion on whether or not Russia is justified in its invasion of Ukraine? Because nobody here is talking about lifting the sanctions to please Russia, Russia would have to stop invading Ukraine, which is explicitly not "
9.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
What? No, Ukraine and the Western world would be the ones participating in appeasement, not Russia. In your mind, how justified is Russia in this conflict?
10.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
What you're feeling is selfishness, not sociopathy, for what it's worth! I don't think a sociopath would wonder what you're wondering here, but I'm no expert.
11.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
> and that requires a willingness from "us" to make peace with Russia This is false. It requires a willingness from Russia to stop invading Ukraine. What you're writing here is appeasement, and it it's a very bad id
12.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
You have the life experience to know what will and won't affect you, and you've found an equilibrium of control and impact that apparently makes you happy. That's very you specific, not really related to your age, other tha
13.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Eh no, "speaking up" has varying outcomes in varying environments, this is not a universal constant. I've chosen the job I have now specifically because I wanted to be able to do something about things I see that could be goi
14.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Small semantic issue, but “make peace with Russia” implies they’re not the aggressors. Russia can end this tomorrow, by withdrawing from Ukraine. You probably didn’t mean to imply anything, but it’s a sensitive topic, semantics matter.
15.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Did you think”no spam ever” was the pitch? Then you misunderstood.
16.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Eh, it doesn’t feel like work for me. I really enjoy my partner, she enjoys me, and I don’t think we have to do very much “work” to maintain that. If I started writing literal daily notes to my wife, she’d be very concerned something was w
17.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
You actually joined HN less than a month before I did, FWIW. You should know better!
18.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
I don’t like or dislike Terraform, you’re just not making any sense.
19.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Honestly yeah I think it’s a form of satire[0], which IMO takes nothing away from the joke. Satire is fun! And I think the folks taking the math seriously are probably in on the joke. [0] or whatever brand of comedy “imagine a cow approxim
20.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Yes shame on you for not realizing a 0.x versioned technology would make breaking changes on minor version updates. Given: 1) Terraform uses Semantic Versioning [0] 2) Semantic Versioning specifically states that 0.x APIs are not stable [1]
21.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
You even admit you haven't used TF in a long time, and when you did use TF it hadn't been 1.0 yet, which means you should fully expect breaking changes to take place. In no way is your complaint valid for a technology that hadn&#x
22.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
> Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills.[0] Approximately 2007 (the year HN was created). [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguideline
23.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
This just sounds like you don't like TF, and no matter how well executed this tool would be, you'd always criticize it for using TF. I wouldn't really call that feedback, just a luddite-esque bias on your part. I'm patte
24.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
You don't get to have "your own way" of working entirely, as you work with others. Even if you don't get value out of daily standups because you don't know how to make use of them, others won't let their inabil
25.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
The "only I can truly help you" pattern is a very common one for selling hokum, so yeah I would agree this is probably a way to peel readers from other self-help gurus.
26.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
This presupposes standups were for you (the manager) in the first place, but they were/are not. They're for the developers to keep in sync. For tiny teams (1-2 developers) that's trivial and doesn't need a shared conver
27.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Sorry but that’s not trust, that’s distrust. If you trusted your team members, you’d see the clear efficiency in having a single, shared place to check what people can do for one another to make doing the work easier. You don’t want to comm
28.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Walk the board! If you go person-by-person you’re feeding into the worst parts of standups. Go story by story. If someone isn’t doing anything story related, they’re there to help others if something comes up (and need to be listening) b
29.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
The disclaimer absolutely protects the company from reporting a wildly “inaccurate” subjective number, which is apparently a concept you simply do not understand.
30.
▲
by
NotTameAntelope
4y ago
Eh, just sounds like you have a good routine going, based on the study results you could probably skip the microdosing and achieve the same performance.
More ›