5 ms·
The property owner in this case is the American people, who I'm pretty sure don't support this. They may have hired a property manager, but if the manager goes
by ImPostingOnHN 21d ago
The property owner in this case is the American people, who I'm pretty sure don't support this.
They may have hired a property manager, but if the manager goes rogue, what the owners say is more important.
- 0xDEAFBEAD 21d agoOK but that's a much different argument from "the cruelty is the point".
- ImPostingOnHN 21d agoThe legal perspective doesn't preclude that the cruelty is the point.
- 0xDEAFBEAD 21d agoConsider the possibility that people might simply have different views from you.
- ImPostingOnHN 20d agoYou're right, that is always a possibility for any random thing. Okay, done. Now you do the same.
- 0xDEAFBEAD 20d agoI'm looking for the view you guys have beneath all the performative outrage and I haven't been able to discover it yet. For example, this user wasn't able to explain why foreigners shouldn't vote in US elections: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49465747 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49465747
- ImPostingOnHN 18d agoI think you responded to the wrong post. Try going to your link to respond to a post about your link. Back to this topic: have you yet considered the possibility that people might simply have different views from you on what constitutes unreasonable cruelty? Doing that consideration yourself might help you understand why people do not agree with you, or take seriously your performative outrage on the matter.