8 ms·
The obvious reason is that they would prefer to have CLAUDE.md files in every repo (even if it's just a symlink to AGENTS.md). It serves as a free advertisement
by OleksandrC 28d ago
The obvious reason is that they would prefer to have CLAUDE.md files in every repo (even if it's just a symlink to AGENTS.md). It serves as a free advertisement for them. Same reason as for auto-adding attribution text in commit messages, etc. It's the "Sent from my iPhone" of our time.
- Diti 28d ago[flagged]
- pjm331 28d agoIf only we had some sort of technology that enabled large scale refactoring
- dcre 28d agoNo.
- gigatexal 28d agoNah I think it’s the advertising angle.
- fastball 28d agoIt would take like 30s of vibe-coding (including writing the prompt) to add support for AGENTS.md to claude code.
- threecheese 28d agoI’m not sure; I don’t just agree with GP - I feel like I might subconsciously devalue them if I didnt see that advertisement in every folder. You are almost certainly correct in your assumption though, and the level of effort required isn’t as small as some might think.
- kelvinjps10 28d ago>auto-adding attribution text in commit messages what about this? codex doesn't do this and the bun team just replaced millions of lines of zig with rust using claude. For this you might not even need AI at all.
- nostrebored 28d agorg CLAUDE.md > refactor_hits.txt claude -p "@refactor_hits.txt support either CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md in each location. if they both exist, prefer CLAUDE.md and do not concatenate"
- postalcoder 28d agoI think it's more than that. They truly believe Claude Code to be a moat (both the harness and the posttraining) to be a moat. I've been deeply distrustful of Anthropic from early early days. They have always been openly disdainful of user feedback. I would not be surprised if later they try to implement more shenanigans to keep people locked into CC.
- epistasis 28d agoClaude Code is quickly becoming an anchor. Every week I marvel at how much worse it gets, how much more essential information is hidden and replaced with bloated useless TUI and rambling tangential responses that hide the useful bits of info behind jargon invented by the agent without ever explaining it to the user. It's like the PMs for Claude Code are reward hacking their own reinforcement learning.
- annzabelle 28d agoWhat tools do you find are better? I have been happy with Claude Code lately, but I haven't explored other options much in over a year. Curious to try something else out if it's less rambling and tangential.
- dalenw 28d agoNot OP but I like OpenCode a lot. But OhMyPi: https://omp.sh/ https://omp.sh/ is also taking off. Personally I didn't like it as much as OpenCode.
- pixlmint 28d agoyeh i tried pi, as a neovim user i naturally like customizability, but with how little i use agents, i want something that just works, which opencode does for me.
- 8cvor6j844qw_d6 28d agoNew guidelines that I have seen in a certain place is to configure and update existing CC setups to be CC/Codex agnostic. Plus setting up both allows Claude Code to delegate tasks [1] to Codex to reduce usage. Most are easy to share with symlinks and @agents. https://github.com/openai/codex-plugin-cc https://github.com/openai/codex-plugin-cc
- johnsmith1840 28d agoExcept I actively despise that commit message anytime I see it.