7 ms·

> Hospitals have an operating margin of 2-5% Very curious where this comes from and how accurate it is. For example the $37 a provider charges for an Aspirin s

• bell-cot 1mo ago
  Hand-waving numerous details, but - That $37 isn't the price in the hospital's gift shop. It's n=1 pricing, hand delivered to your bedside by a nurse with a whole hierarchy of higher-level medical & admin staff behind her, and documented out the wazoo. Aspirin could be free & unlimited at the hospital pharmacy's receiving dock, and it wouldn't affect the @bedside price.
  • entropicdrifter 1mo ago
    ... and in other countries, medical administrative costs are far lower because they don't need to build entire divisions around correctly coding the same condition and procedure 11 different times before insurance approves it, because the insurance is universal and self-consistent by comparison to our private fractured mess.
    • bell-cot 1mo ago
      It ain't just the insurance crap that drives up medical overhead costs in the US. Our health care system is treated as a money farm by plenty of other industries and interests. All of which are willing to fight tooth and nail to preserve "their" fat slices of the obscenely bloated pie. And on top of that you've got synergies like the horrific cost of housing in the US - which drives up the cost of every employee, no matter how essential they might be to providing actual medical care.
• rayiner 1mo ago
  Audited financial statements of all kinds of hospitals, both non-profit and for-profit. Here’s data from Moodey’s a credit rating agency: https://www.chartis.com/insights/hospital-margins-trend-higher-looming-disruption-demands-strategic-decisions https://www.chartis.com/insights/hospital-margins-trend-high... (“This month, Moody’s credit rating agency released its annual not-for-profit and public healthcare median financial report for 2024, showing that overall hospital performance continues to improve. The median operating margin increased from 0.5% in 2023 to 1.5% in 2024.”). The $37 for an aspirin offsets huge costs elsewhere for (non-NP) nurses, receptionists, janitors, orderlies, etc., who can’t bill directly to medicare.
• EA-3167 1mo ago
  Ever hear of loss leaders? Some parts of a typical hospital make money while others lose it hand over fist. The overall margin isn’t across the board, it’s after everything hopefully balances out. ER’s for example are money pits, but society really needs them. https://www.definitivehc.com/resources/healthcare-insights/hospital-operating-margins-united-states#:~:text=the%20median%20operating,-2.9%25%20in%202024%2C https://www.definitivehc.com/resources/healthcare-insights/h...
  • nradov 1mo ago
    That's true, but obscuring the true costs through hidden cross-subsidies isn't helping anyone in the long run. We would probably be better off with state and local governments setting requirements for ER capacity in each region, and then running an annual reverse auction system where hospitals can bid on maintaining that capacity in exchange for cash payments.
  • robot_jesus 1mo ago
    Exactly this. They need to offset the areas where they lose money. And we have federal laws (justifiably so, IMHO) that ERs must provide stabilizing services regardless of insurance and ability to pay. And while that law is obviously humane and reasonable, my only gripe is that the rest of our system is so backwards that it increasingly forces people to leverage that. There was a story about a woman who needed dialysis but had no insurance. So basically, she had to wait every couple weeks until she started breaking down, go to the ER, get emergency dialysis, get sent home. Rinse, repeat. I don't blame her but really just the system that made this her best possible option. https://kdvr.com/news/local/every-week-this-woman-nearly-dies-before-she-can-get-medical-treatment/ https://kdvr.com/news/local/every-week-this-woman-nearly-die...
    • avgDev 1mo ago
      But wouldn't nationalized healthcare help with this? The amount of uninsured individuals would drop drastically.
      • 1mo ago
• Aurornis 1mo ago
  Insurance pays the higher of their negotiated rate or the billed charge. Medical facilities set their billed rates so high that they’re guaranteed to be higher than all negotiated rates, ensuring that they get paid. When you see $37 aspirin on the line, nobody actually pays $37 for it. The billed amount is replaced with whatever insurance rate is allowed for that. If someone is cash paying they get a large discount. The billed items also have to cover everything. It’s not directly $37 for the aspirin, or the $5 or whatever allowed coverage it ultimately gets billed it. That had to cover the facilities, the salaries of the pharmacy staff who reviewed the request and dispensed it, the staff who inventory and order the medications, and the cost of billing insurance. The only part that nationalized health care would change are the allowable billed rate and maybe the administrative overhead of billing different insurances. Even nationalized health care systems have admin overhead though. You can think of it like when you have to pay $11 for a single glass of wine from a bottle that the restaurant paid $10 for. You’re not just paying for the liquid, you are paying into a big bucket of charges that all need to add up to more than the cost of the supplies, staff, building, and everything that goes into running it. The margin on individual products doesn’t make the entire operation profitable.
  • sahila 1mo ago
    > The billed items also have to cover everything. It’s not directly $37 for the aspirin, or the $5 or whatever allowed coverage it ultimately gets billed it. That had to cover the facilities, the salaries of the pharmacy staff who reviewed the request and dispensed it, the staff who inventory and order the medications, and the cost of billing insurance. That's the same as any? CVS charging $5 for aspirin has to cover their staff who stocked and checked out the item, the shelf space, the marketing, and the looting. The comparison you make between a bottle of wine vs a glass is not the right one. It's two different stores selling the same product. What's different about hospitals?
    • fragmede 1mo ago
      The nursing staff to give the patient aspirin costs a lot more than someone stocking boxes on shelves.
• happyPersonR 1mo ago
  Hospitals, now that private equity is involved, do this weird cost shifting accounting BS with shell companies etc, as such their books aren’t straight forward and the 2-5% thing is likely greatly underestimated given the amount of understaffing PE has driven in that space and how much gouging there is from PBM etc.
• HEmanZ 1mo ago
  You can search for more reports, because they do vary based on methodology. But the median hospital in the US makes between -1% (yes, negative, they lose money, because a huge percentage are non profits) and 4% depending on the source. When the hospital charges you $37 for an aspirin, that singular pill might have a crazy profit margin in isolation. But your entire treatment could very well be losing the hospital money. In my own anecdotal experience, the one hospital I know enough details about to comment on specifically, had something like 85% of patients costing the hospital more money than the hospital made. It was entirely funded by the relatively small number of people who had the “right” insurance and had the “right” procedures done. Eg Kaufman: https://www.vizient.com/insights/reports/national-hospital-flash-report/may-2026-data https://www.vizient.com/insights/reports/national-hospital-f...
  • jasonlotito 1mo ago
    fyi: Your link returns a 404 for me. Oops! We can't find the page you're looking for
  • joquarky 1mo ago
    Not buying any of this when the world is now full of dark patterns¹ and the ultimate result is that people in charge keep getting richer, faster. ¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting
    • 93po 1mo ago
      This is immediately what came to mind to me. You can be extremely profitable but paying out tens of billions in dividends, or a million other things.
      • loeg 1mo ago
        Dividends aren't a Loss.
    • s1artibartfast 1mo ago
      many hospitals are run by non-profits or the government (e.g. universities)
• nradov 1mo ago
  Hospital billing practices are often terrible or even fraudulent, but stories about the $37 aspirin are generally misleading. Most hospital claims and bills are actually coded around day rates and DRGs, so even if the aspirin shows up as a line item it doesn't actually impact the patient's financial responsibility or the amount allowed by their health plan. (I'm not trying to defend such a confusing system, just explaining how it works.)
  • nobody9999 1mo ago
    >Most hospital claims and bills are actually coded around day rates and DRGs, so even if the aspirin shows up as a line item it doesn't actually impact the patient's financial responsibility or the amount allowed by their health plan. (I'm not trying to defend such a confusing system, just explaining how it works.) Yep. Hospital "bills" are a fiction. On one occasion I was presented with an "Explanation of Benefits" for a hospital stay where I was "charged" for being in two hospital rooms at the same time. As if that weren't enough I was also "charged" with having a "Pap smear"[0], even though I don't have a cervix. I complained bitterly and after making a big stink was informed by the hospital my insurer that the items weren't actually "billed". Rather, the insurance company paid $1500/day regardless of the treatment provided. It's disgusting!
    • nobody9999 1mo ago
      Just in case anyone didn't get the reference (I forgot to include the link -- mea culpa). A Pap smear[0] is a diagnostic test to detect (pre)cancerous cells on one's cervix[1]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pap_test https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pap_test [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cervix https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cervix
  • jsmith45 1mo ago
    To be clear, they are billing for all the coded line items at the listed prices, it is just that the agreements with the insurance company will disallow many of the line items in favor of other ones. They bill everything, because they may accept some insurance that has not negotiated a day rate, and in that case, the day rate code would be disallowed and some of the other line items will be paid at relevant negotiated rates instead (with others still likely disallowed). It needs to be the same bill in both cases, so they need to include everything, and the list prices need to be greater than or equal to what any insurance would pay, or they might lose out on the difference. This is one of the areas where more standardization would certainly help. If there were more standardization of which codes disallow which other ones (which can currently vary wildly by plan even with the same insurer, must less across insurers), then a lot of line items could actually get removed as truly redundant, vastly simplifying the bill.
• ryathal 1mo ago
  Medicare has been playing a shell game with reimbursements for decades. They cut the base rate for an office visit or hospital stay to below the cost of the actual service, but allow for separate charges for various things that make up the difference so that doctors don't just stop accepting Medicare in mass. That's why you get billed $37 dollars for aspirin, $15 for drug administration, $50 for IV placement, $10/bag for saline drips, $75 for vitals checks, etc. That way the hospital can make up the money lost from the actual visit charge, this also requires more administration overhead, to both keep track of all the additional charges, and to make changes as the rules change.
• amluto 1mo ago
  On the occasions that I’ve watched a hospital go through the actual process of selling a small amount of inexpensive medication for a large amount of money, there is a ridiculous amount of ceremony involved. I can easily imagine that it costs that hospital 2 cents for the pill, $5 in amortized capital plus operating expense for the facility that stores that pill, plus $25 in labor and IT expenses to get that pill to the patient.
  • mvdtnz 1mo ago
    I, too, can invent numbers from nothing.
    • amluto 1mo ago
      Yes, but can you personally allocate four people, two computers, a wristband, a HIPAA-compliant database, a HIPAA-compliant data entry system, and at least two barcode scanners to get an aspirin out of the bottle? I’m making a serious point here: medical overspending is not just gobs of money ending up in a single pocket. The US medical system really is incredibly complex, and the money is moving all over the place and being spent on many things. Most of those cost centers may all zero or even negative value to the patient, but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist.
  • marysminefnuf 1mo ago
    My wifes a doctor and i can assure you they are gouging you. What it is is that the insurance companys are really in the purchase processing business. So what they do is institute fees on every possible charge and the hospitals in our area mark everything up as a result. Thats part of the problem.
• outside1234 1mo ago
  This is because a whole swath of people are getting the aspirin for free (uninsured) so they need to gouge the payers for the aspirin. Also, then, of course, we need to cover the United Healthcare guy's salary, which decreases margins.
• Pragmata 1mo ago
  You understand that hospitals have more costs than just aspirin, right? Depreciation, amortization, utilities, rent, taxes, maintenance, salaries, etc... Its all coming out of revenue.
• dragonwriter 1mo ago
  It comes from the fact that lots of the charges they bill (both of the patient share billed to insured patients and of all costs billed to uninsured patients) end up written down or off because they are uncollectable. The margin built into the prices bulled is not the actual margin the hospital ends up with.