Supermancho

4 ms·

1.
by Supermancho 4d ago
> Actually sorry, it's beyond absurd. So is Fox News. That's the OVERT propaganda.
2.
by Supermancho 5d ago
If someone believed he committed even a portion of the crimes attributed to him and his associates, it follows that someone would have to believe he had firsthand knowledge. There's no reason to believe he would kill himself while stil
3.
by Supermancho 5d ago
Without a doubt, this material has been scrubbed and censored and altered. There are no lengths to which this administration (or any other) would go to, to safeguard publishing material that might be used against them or their associates. T
4.
by Supermancho 5d ago
The shadow of Chesterton's Fence is relevant. The LLM doesn't know why code exists, if it doesnt start traversing up the scope of a project. Even then, it can't be sure that the code isn't a dependency of something else
5.
by Supermancho 5d ago
> Efficiency, security, maintainability, reliability, readability, understandability, extensibility, maintainability, observability, portability My experience is a little different. For higher abstraction languages the output is largely
6.
by Supermancho 6d ago
> "we all stopped coding manually around December 2025", as if AI critics don't exist. It was obviously a generalization. The number of AI critics (which eschew AI for coding) are a minority. I would say tiny minority at t
7.
by Supermancho 7d ago
> Private citizens filming in public and police forces setting up arrays of surveillance cameras in public somehow don’t seem equivalent. The reason these strategies (for the same goal) don't seem equivalent is due to the nature of
8.
by Supermancho 8d ago
> Most of the current discourse around AI seems to be informed by “The Terminator” lore. I am thinking it's more like The Matrix lore of The Second Renaissance from Animatrix.
9.
by Supermancho 8d ago
As I look back to after the Kuwait defense, the attack on Iraq and forward stopped making sense because US leadership didn't explain the rationale. Politicians didn't want to get caught up in the problematic history of dealing wit
10.
by Supermancho 10d ago
Copilot has enterprise controls. Its not open source. This is the easiest integration and large companies are eating it up as the path of least friction, using API cost calls. I call BS.
11.
by Supermancho 11d ago
> If the mere act of eating a staple food item causes so many carbon emissions it contributes to planetary-scale climate change, you have an overpopulation problem. That is incorrect. If there is one person who produces the same amount
12.
by Supermancho 11d ago
> The president's job is to be the dumb unthinking agent of Congress Execution will never be as simple as the textual content of a bill, so I'm not sure 'mindless' is a useful term. While the POTUS is expected to be a
13.
by Supermancho 11d ago
The demographic collapse was a forgine conclusion in the 80s. There is no global overpopulation problem over the next century. There will be food shortages due to a lack of labor and dessicated farmland. It will be rough for the average hum
14.
by Supermancho 12d ago
I can agree that poor people break the law more often. Not "are convicted of" but the acts. I think the reasons are obvious and unrelated to the point of the study. Desperation, culture (broken window theory) which is critically r
15.
by Supermancho 12d ago
Anti-capitalism does not automatically qualify as communism. Notably, if IP were to be abolished, it doesn't belong to anyone. The expectation that open anything includes some sort of DRM-like content gating is counterproductive.
16.
by Supermancho 13d ago
No need to engage with bad faith premises. You cant convince someone who is invested in their own FUD.
17.
by Supermancho 13d ago
> The frontend is less risky to just hand to an agent. The smaller the problem, the less risky it is to do this, regardless of the nature of the problem. This is not a frontend-specific issue today.
18.
by Supermancho 13d ago
> Did humans deploy the model, Or did the model deploy itself? > It sounds like "AGI" just stands for "IPO" as it always has been. People don't usually respond to noise.
19.
by Supermancho 13d ago
Netflix link above, is correct. SNL parody https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhGTtWsW9F8
20.
by Supermancho 13d ago
or worse, Dublin.
21.
by Supermancho 13d ago
> "a random birth is far more likely to fall near the present" is correct, If the selection is from the population at random (as the UI indicates), but it specifically says it's based on a random year (during which humans
22.
by Supermancho 14d ago
Aside from the fact that Matt Pocock spends a lot of time with LLMS (only Claude really), he has a hand-wavy approach to engineering in a silo. He then uses that output as a foundation for other tools, while touting them as the best way to
23.
by Supermancho 15d ago
> they don't trust the generated code because it doesn't pass their process That's not a credible scenario. Developers can either make changes by hand, or by asking an LLM, which is the common process when there is a downs
24.
by Supermancho 15d ago
> the message appears to be correct. "in shambles because of AI" no. It's the same as it always was.
25.
by Supermancho 16d ago
* Sibutramine (weight loss medication) * Suldenafil or tadalafil (ED medication) * SARMS (steroids in general) * Caffeine powder (another game of guess the dosage)
26.
by Supermancho 17d ago
I think the perceived situation is a matter of degree. I would say there's a measurable (almost overwhelming) amount of corporate influence already. I have no doubt there are agency operatives influencing discussion online, from record
27.
by Supermancho 17d ago
Once you get past trivial problems, the issue is not just "solving the problem" but proving the solution "solves the problem". This is the strongest argument as to why AI should only be used as small solvers (at this poi
28.
by Supermancho 18d ago
> arguing that it’s possible to make them by hand isn’t just missing the point; it’s missing the entire discussion >> Before they were not able to spam large PRs I was replying to someone insinuating that there was something I migh
29.
by Supermancho 18d ago
Why not? I'm pretty sure a developer could spam large PRs before and regardless of AI involvement is allowed or not.
30.
by Supermancho 18d ago
Moving the goalpost out to "automatic military response" is not compelling.

More ›