5 ms·
https://thereallo.dev/blog/claude-code-prompt-steganography https://thereallo.dev/blog/claude-code-prompt-steganography Why should I trust a US company more th
by w4lker 2mo ago
https://thereallo.dev/blog/claude-code-prompt-steganography https://thereallo.dev/blog/claude-code-prompt-steganography
Why should I trust a US company more than a Chinese one?
- theptip 2mo agoYour exhibit is an obvious anti-distillation technique. You can expect far worse from less-regulated companies.
- throw1234567891 2mo agoNeither Anthropic nor OpenAI are regulated in the "regulated business" meaning.
- theptip 2mo agoI count being incorporated in Delaware as a high baseline level of regulation vs. random Chinese API providers.
- throw1234567891 2mo agoFrom where I sit, it could be incorporated in Mauritius.
- simianparrot 2mo ago[flagged]
- Envwnger 2mo agoWhat if they don't live in USA?
- Der_Einzige 2mo agoThe ROI for (white) men going to China for a period of their lives is extremely high. Where else are you going to get your “Abg cmo”
- mad_tortoise 2mo agoThis is such an hilarious answer. For most of the non-Western world, we don't distrust China because they have created benefits for the developing world. Whereas the USA has been outright imperialist for the past 60-70 years, undermining and overthrowing developing democracies, putting in dictators, using international organisations as debt traps, waging and funding wars that put our lives and economies at risk. It is so pathetic how American's see themselves, and are so deeply afraid of China. I am far more fearful of the predatory nature of the USA and its agencies than I could ever be of China who would never have any interest in me.
- ToValueFunfetti 2mo agoThank god. I'd been hearing we screwed up catastrophically by electing an admin that took a chainsaw to our foreign aid programs, killing millions in the developing world. Such a relief to learn we were never doing that stuff in the first place.
- Natfan 2mo agothe left hand feeds while the right hand beats
- a34729t 2mo agoyeah comments like this show that ending USAID was the right move (apart from it's obvious utility to pass along bribes)
- mad_tortoise 2mo agoEnding USAID is the exact reason hundreds of thousands suffer more today than they did a few years ago. It is the reason mass migration takes place from developing to developed. The total ignorance and outright stupidity of comments like this is why Yanks should really take a seat when it comes to talking about geopolitics.
- psychoslave 2mo agoAbstracted from the HN specific audience, there’s around 17% chance they already do, which is to compare to the "around 4%" chance they live in USA. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/ https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by...
- inigyou 2mo agoBeen there. Great place. High standard of living, everyone is very productive. Still a dictatorship, and you can't speak ill of the government, but a successful one.
- Natfan 2mo agomy understanding is that you can speak ill of the government publicly? like they'll nuke your billibilli if you talk shit about xi, but you can complain privately to a friend not saying i agree with it, i'm saying it isn't as severe as the west makes it out to be
- ozgrakkurt 2mo agoThat is an extremely low bar. Imagine you couldn't do that, that would basically be George Orwell's 1984.
- Natfan 2mo agowell in 1984 the two way televisions would get you again i'm not saying i approve, I'm pointing out the distinction
- brettermeier 2mo ago[flagged]
- datsci_est_2015 2mo agoHey but it’s wrapped in gold foil, much like its president’s domestic interiors.
- bamboozled 2mo agoAgree, China believes in Climate change and are at least taking steps to address it. Personally this is making me trust them more than the USA because, facts. I mean lesser of two evils thinking, if one is intentionally leading us towards climate disaster, while the other isn't then yeah. What else can be said? Should I trust the authoritarian country who believes in engineering and science, or the one that doesn't?
- petcat 2mo agoUSA and Europe are basically equal in terms of yearly production of renewable energy. Texas + California alone rank 6th in the world.
- sarchertech 2mo agoChina emits 3x more co2 than the US and last year their rate of increase was 2.5x that of the US. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country/ https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by...
- Ekaros 2mo agoUSA emits 2165574,97709 times more than Faroe Islands. Sounds like they should be forced to limit that to some reasonable level say 2x of that of Faroe Islands. Don't think it would be too big ask right?
- sarchertech 2mo agoChina produces 1/3 of the world’s CO2. They already produce more per capita than all other large developed countries except Australia, the US, and Russia. And their rate of growth is higher than all of those countries except Russia. There’s no way to force them to do anything, but this is not that action of a nation that “believes in climate change”.
- nixon_why69 2mo agoThat's while being the world's factory, having lots of green energy, electric cars and an ACUTE motivation to reduce oil imports. Coal is a problem but at least they're not canceling half-finished green energy products when administrations change.
- butlike 2mo agoExactly my question
- jayd16 2mo agoYou shouldn't trust either but also this is whataboutism.
- platinumrad 2mo agoThere's nothing intrinsically wrong with "whataboutism" and it is in fact often illuminating.
- pessimizer 2mo agoEspecially because the original criticism is usually a stand-in for an overarching moral condemnation. "Whataboutism" was a US defense for the fact that it was an apartheid state while criticizing political and financial liberties in the Soviet Union. It also worked. The shame built up in the US so quickly that laws started being struck from the books. The US entered WWII with a segregated military, and by the time it marched into Korea, it was rapidly desegregating. The Soviet Union had successfully made its case that the US had no moral high ground, although it had not made its case for its specific set of limitations of financial and political liberties. "Whataboutism" is just ad hominem for dummies. But if the real argument is about who is the better man, or what is the better system, ad hominem isn't a logical fallacy. It's simply a change of subject.
- WithinReason 2mo agoNo it's not. There is a difference between a comparison and whataboutism
- pessimizer 2mo agoNo, it is not. Whataboutism is a specific term created (by Cold War propagandists) to refer to when the US criticizes the USSR about "X," and the Soviet Union replies by asking about "Y" in the US. It is not a term created to refer to when some American criticizes any of America's official enemies for "X," and someone else reminds you that America also does exactly "X."
- jayd16 2mo ago