fooster

6 ms·

1.
by fooster 3d ago
Carney made it pretty clear what was in the deal. I don’t understand why you believe Trump who lies every time he opens his mouth?
2.
by fooster 4d ago
Yeah 51st state governer carney. This guy is deadly serious. Deals hammered out with Trump are not worth the paper they’re written on. Besides that Trump has already violated CUSMA a deal he signed himself and has invoked ridiculous laws to
3.
by fooster 10d ago
It’s also worth mentioning that these are very western ideas. Lots of other cultures derive alternative structures not based around 12 half steps to an octave and so on.
4.
by fooster 21d ago
I've used linux desktops for years, and in my experience it is quite difficult to fight against the default keybindings. It is much easier to go with the status quo, which is annoying especially if you regularly switch between a mac an
5.
by fooster 22d ago
Otherwise known as fiction.
6.
by fooster 22d ago
Apart from anything else the keybindings are the most annoying thing ever.
7.
by fooster 22d ago
Ok, what am I using on my workstations then? Windows? Hell no. Terrible hardware, OS sucks. Linux? Hell no! Terrible hardware, desktop is terrible.
8.
by fooster 24d ago
> Why wouldn't it be deliberate? Do you think it's happening without the Anthropic team's go ahead? Or maybe they aren't aware that it's happening? Yes that’s exactly what I think. I also don’t think the team was
9.
by fooster 24d ago
I'm certainly reading the code and comments, and I encourage all of my team members to do so. You are assuming that this excessive and nonsensnical comment choice is deliberate. It cannot be, or should not be because it regularly confu
10.
by fooster 25d ago
No it doesn’t. The comments are hugely verbose trash that immediately becomes outdated and brittle and confusing for humans and Claude alike.
11.
by fooster 25d ago
They’re monsters? Did they shutter an agency which caused the death on how many millions again?
12.
by fooster 25d ago
I didn’t see china calling to annex Canada. The bad relations between china and Canada were also principally caused by the US insisting that we detain Meng Wanzhou. We can see what thanks we got for that.
13.
by fooster 26d ago
Yes lots and lots of growth.
14.
by fooster 26d ago
You can accept what you like, but it's true. Our team and our business is incredibly more productive. The number of new valuable customer facing features, and the number of PRs (which represent REAL work, not taking a PR and splitting
15.
by fooster 1mo ago
I don't think that is true. coding at a baseline is hard no matter what. If it was easy everyone could have done it, and clearly that isn't true. Now there is hard-er coding. Novel algorithms, performance sensitive stuff, and so
16.
by fooster 1mo ago
They’re going zip it up, as if that won’t break eventually and then leak into the environment. I don’t need to be an environmental scientist to know that is a monumentally stupid solution.
17.
by fooster 1mo ago
Yeah sure I’m deep ocean it would kills the local ecosystem
18.
by fooster 1mo ago
The ocean seems to contain a great deal of salt though.
19.
by fooster 2mo ago
It’s also not true that because it wasn’t part of the initial design that it was harder to retrofit. I just don’t understand all this go bashing that happens on this site especially when so much is badly informed speculation. I guess it’s e
20.
by fooster 2mo ago
I don’t see it that way. What maga is going is completely and utterly outside the law.
21.
by fooster 2mo ago
Saying it is a matter of degree is an attempt to make what the current administration is doing is similar to what prior admins did. They are not. They are corrupt to the core. As for Biden he pardoned his son beacuse of a MAGA witchhunt.
22.
by fooster 2mo ago
Just to quote a poster above: "You seem to think China is the evil polluter here. Just sort by per capita, and you'll see it's not even in the top 10% most polluting per capita."
23.
by fooster 2mo ago
Dude, really open your mind and stop arguing mindlessly. We're using this to great success on a serious sass product with hundreds of thousands of users. I'm not some AI influencer, or blowing smoke. The source of errors can be wh
24.
by fooster 2mo ago
Not really? Imagine for example looking for http status code 500 in an api log over the past hour. The nice thing here is it doesn’t matter if you get them all because it’s reoccur (or not).
25.
by fooster 2mo ago
There are many sources of boring predictable errors which nonetheless are easy to miss and easy to fix. API validation errors for example.
26.
by fooster 2mo ago
Really they're not. But it seems you have decided that you, above all, know best.
27.
by fooster 2mo ago
You want your team spending their time fixing these simple errors? The secret sauce is in the triage. We've adopted solutions alot like this, and now our team spends its time on much more meaningful work.
28.
by fooster 2mo ago
I think you need to open your mind to the possibilities? For example: - scanning logs for errors and - opening issues which are then auto-triaged and - PRs are opened for them and auto-reviewed and - merged (and deployed). This workflow alo
29.
by fooster 2mo ago
It doesn't feel strange to me at all. It feels like a very human response from the person that introduced the change. I great appreciate that, rather than ignoring the problem, or some canned corpspeak response.
30.
by fooster 2mo ago
Sure, but there are less assertions to check. The surface area and boundaries are smaller and more limited.

More ›