desterothx

10 ms·

1.
by desterothx 5d ago
Speaking as a person that had to buy 2 additional psp chargers (my ebook reader uses one too), please throw those onto ebay or your local marketplace instead :)
2.
by desterothx 5d ago
Well he probably didn't admit the user error part
3.
by desterothx 5d ago
I mean that is addressed as well later, even when they do declare the quantization, doesn't mean you'll get better performance than the lower quantized one. I'm guessing they're doing something similar to what stadia was
4.
by desterothx 5d ago
IMO it doesn't make sense for LLMs to write machine code, because abstraction allows them to have more information density. As context size is a big limitation right now, cluttering it with less dense information seems like a bad idea.
5.
by desterothx 7d ago
The speeds are theoretical (unachievable), time dilation itself is robust and proved (gps wouldn't work as precisely without accounting for it)
6.
by desterothx 7d ago
They have no zero data retention commitments anymore though? In fact they have quite the opposite, a direct message of storing prompts since the release of sol (but we wont train on it trust us wink wink)
7.
by desterothx 8d ago
Billions lost, while waiting for their trillion ipo. Im sure they would manage...
8.
by desterothx 8d ago
They will, as soon as they get the same proof without it being obvious in the prompts they stole the research
9.
by desterothx 8d ago
Because your competitor is likely doing the same thing, so they wont even try to call you out. Oh oh or because you're planning the largest IPO in history. The opinions of average people on the paper aren't going to be the ones re
10.
by desterothx 8d ago
Where were you seeing those roumors? Care to point to an HN post?
11.
by desterothx 8d ago
Sure we do, you can follow the weights so to say, to see which data turns out to be more important vs less important for predictions of a higher quality
12.
by desterothx 8d ago
The alps are shared between Switzerland, Italy and France. You can live in the French alps a lot cheaper than in Switzerland
13.
by desterothx 9d ago
We are talking about models of the flash size, 100s of billions of parameters, don't listen to the media, size does matter
14.
by desterothx 9d ago
As the agi nurse fails to wipe his ass the intelligent HN commenter shouted: "You're moving the goalposts. You never said it needs to wipe my ass SUCCESFULLY"
15.
by desterothx 9d ago
Where are you getting your information from? From all I've seen the RL gives an incremental improvement, most of the capability increase comes from new model architectures (eg the jump from opus to fable is greater than the jump from o
16.
by desterothx 9d ago
Well it could assure MAD better than a human i guess
17.
by desterothx 12d ago
astrum is one star, astra is a plural of stars
18.
by desterothx 13d ago
iirc, some of the original fable bemchmarks showed this. Definitely saw it in other frontier releases though
19.
by desterothx 13d ago
Could you point me to the goals so I know when I'm moving the goalposts?
20.
by desterothx 13d ago
How would you define intelligence in terms of optimization theory? Also intelligence implies more than just problem solving, in fact it's another one of those pesky hard to define things
21.
by desterothx 13d ago
Made 4800 dollars in 2 weeks, EBITDA of course, with the demand of the novelty of an ai driven cafe, and with a single customer providing 20% of its revenue. In other words, it lost money. For further reading see [1] [1] https://y
22.
by desterothx 13d ago
Climate change is a well defined term. AGI isn't. You're comparing apples and toasters
23.
by desterothx 13d ago
I'm so sick of every criticism being explained away as goal post moving. Can anyone give me the discussion where we came to some concensus of what the goals were? How can I know when I'm moving a goalpost when no one told me the g
24.
by desterothx 14d ago
The compatibility with the lab hardware part is going to take a little while, for now running experiments is problematic for LLMs
25.
by desterothx 15d ago
I would argue this has been googles approach as well
26.
by desterothx 16d ago
The questions the LLMs can't solve puts you in a cat and mouse game. They sure can solve most of those with the correct tooling, and i would argue its easier to create this tooling than it is to keep innovating with new questions LLMs
27.
by desterothx 16d ago
You state it as if its only the quality of the hypothesis that matters, but you are ignoring an important part of it, timing. During the 08 financial crisis Burry had a hypothesis that was correct, however he almost went bankrupt still beca
28.
by desterothx 16d ago
Yes, and it still wouldnt help you since they are trying to fetch everything for each of the 921 forks, as stated in the article (same commits need to be cached again on a forked branch)
29.
by desterothx 16d ago
If everyone had devices that could do some compute worth paying for, people would be doing the work all of the time. The problem is actually useful POW is a lot more expensive compute-wise, making it non viable for normal users
30.
by desterothx 16d ago
The use of LLM agents was allowed relatively recently, you still have 20 years of guaranteed no llm commits in the history. As for personal LLMs being the cause of the traffic, I think you are overestimating the number of users of LLMs gene

More ›