7 ms·
Exactly, it’s unrepresentative of AI. It’s damaged AI.
by RA_Fisher 2mo ago
Exactly, it’s unrepresentative of AI. It’s damaged AI.
- BigTTYGothGF 2mo agoIt seems perfectly representative of AI and AI users.
- brokensegue 2mo agoWhy didn't they use a model people actually use?
- BigTTYGothGF 2mo agoBecause they would have had to dig a little more to find trivia it gets wrong. They don't care about "which AI is the best for little facts about movies," they care about "what do people do when the AI gives them a response".
- brokensegue 2mo agoBut surely people's willingness to listen to an AI is contingent on their past experience with this model
- pseudalopex 2mo agoThese people were not told what model answered the questions.
- rsoto2 2mo agoAll AI is flawed and prone to "hallucinations"(doing exactly what it was designed to do) that's why Microsoft considers it an "Entertainment" product.
- looofooo0 2mo agoProofing open math conjectures
- Dylan16807 2mo agoEverything is flawed. But if you're testing the effect of "AI advice" you need to use an AI that has a normal failure rate without tailoring the questions to alter that rate, and/or compare AI versus other sources of information that have the same failure rate.
- mdp2021 2mo ago....Dangerously suggestive post, when you show you don't have a proper idea of "AI" or won't use the term 'AI' properly.
- daveguy 2mo agoYes, definitely a case of bad-think. Certainly not double-plus-good like AI. Dangerous.
- rbanffy 2mo agoI prefer to say AIs are prone to misremember things, as well as humans do. The more you read and learn, the more material you have to get confused, unfortunately. We might want to work around the certainty with which it misremembers things. I have a very large interval of "I have no idea", or "I don't remember" and rarely caught myself misremembering things (my children are far better at that). I assume my grandchildren will eventually improve their parents' scores by a wide margin.