mdp2021

112 ms·

1.
25 Years of Mass Surveillance Is Enough [Auth: Cindy Cohn; Bruce Schneier](lawfaremedia.org)
156 points by mdp2021 1d ago|9 comments
2.
Leak: EU Commission to pitch social media restrictions for under-15s(euronews.com)
19 points by mdp2021 1d ago|21 comments
3.
by mdp2021 3d ago
Obviously that is one of the needs. It clashes with zero-sum game mentalities - and they are part of what needs to be overcome (further questions for the superconsultants).
4.
by mdp2021 3d ago
> the profound stupidity of the humans Which poses the need for getting Intelligence somewhere. > connecting it to important infrastructure Are you aware that agentic NNs can try and do it on their own quirk? Agentic NNs are the b
5.
Ten years of AI reporting ("60 Minutes" Marathon) [video](youtube.com)
1 points by mdp2021 3d ago|1 comments
6.
by mdp2021 3d ago
Contents: > Hands Off the Wheel (Automated Driving) - October 2015 // The Oracle of AI (Kai-Fu Lee) - January 2019 // Kings of the Road (Automated Trucking) - March 2020 // Deepfakes - July 2022 /&#x2F
7.
by mdp2021 3d ago
> access to enough legal services A large part of the world (possibly Nations-transversal, in different amounts) does not work within the boundaries of legal guarantees. Wealth is not an effective enough protection.
8.
by mdp2021 3d ago
(I believe the poster meant: well past tattoos, the next superstep in the "body modification for self expression" subcultural era.)
9.
by mdp2021 3d ago
How can you interpret «developers and researchers working on advanced AI» as «people who are AI researchers by trade or specialisation, or who conducted AI research in the past» - nobody in their sanity would understand that. Or are you com
10.
by mdp2021 4d ago
What you wrote makes no sense in the chain: "If you accepted that C were a crime than C should be sanctioned" - this is not the point. Who argues against that non-matter? You stated that the submission did not represent the facts
11.
by mdp2021 4d ago
LLMs are either a toy if they are not reliable and a mockery if not actually intelligent; to make them intelligent, to achieve Intelligence, is what Sanders proposed to make illegal. What we are striving to do is to achieve Intelligence - i
12.
by mdp2021 4d ago
Seems fixed now: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=grapheneos
13.
by mdp2021 4d ago
Again and again the scum reacts but does not reply.
14.
As antibiotic resistance grows, researchers turn to copper to fight infections(phys.org)
3 points by mdp2021 4d ago|0 comments
15.
Intel Linux NPU Driver Only Now Officially Supports Ubuntu 26.04 LTS(phoronix.com)
4 points by mdp2021 4d ago|0 comments
16.
by mdp2021 4d ago
Explain «Banning Artificial Superintelligence so no person or entity [etc.]». Or you think that «Advanced AI development» does not imply attempting the achievement of Intelligence?
17.
by mdp2021 4d ago
> They might as well rename it to «When in trouble, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout» ~~ Walt Disney - Donald Duck
18.
by mdp2021 4d ago
> editorialised title By whom? It's the actual title of the WSJ article. > to drum up hype before IPO valuations Check the article: it is just a shallow summary of the week - Navier-Stokes plus doomerist's resignations.
19.
by mdp2021 4d ago
He named himself "autophagian" - it just confirms his story. -- Edit: who is that https://ca.linkedin.com/in/analeticiaibarra who signed the disgraced "cindyllm" account? The saboteur even signed it
20.
by mdp2021 4d ago
> The law proposal bans research on ASI Which is exactly the same as the submission's post, obvious interpretations of "AI" aside: how can we implement Intelligence without enabling superintelligence at the same time?! A
21.
by mdp2021 4d ago
> If everybody agree[d] that AI is a threat to humanity Which would be either very difficult or very ironical, given that realizing that humanity is a threat to humanity precedes that.
22.
by mdp2021 4d ago
And you would use an LLM to perform actions when it is not a superintelligence?! We want morons to be under much more than restraining order distance.
23.
by mdp2021 4d ago
The USA should finally revise their system and create more parties. It is absurd that power be left bouncing on the rhythm of "never this, we'll pick whatever that".
24.
by mdp2021 4d ago
Nuclear proliferation is not proper in context. The bill in question in the submission is not about preserving a status quo, it is about banning the technology. A ban on technology results in underground research, migration of intellectuals
25.
by mdp2021 4d ago
> scifi grifters That would be?
26.
by mdp2021 4d ago
> One: nuclear non-proliferation has been pretty successful A number of non adequately reliable actors owning "the bomb" and a number of threatened actors increasingly wanting "the bomb". Not really.
27.
by mdp2021 4d ago
> to the end of the world Or, if things go well, ending a long very bad chapter.
28.
by mdp2021 4d ago
I propose the twisted massage suggestive torture machine that appeared in the first episode of Monkey Punch's Lupin III. /J
29.
by mdp2021 4d ago
+1 for people who want no spying modules and need the phone to serve connectivity (tethering, hotspot). I was very upset to find FB and similar on recent Nokia products.
30.
by mdp2021 4d ago
The UK (High Court - or similar name) has ruled a long time ago that it is Contempt of Court for a lawyer to present unverified material in front of the Judge.

More ›