rsoto2

6 ms·

1.
by rsoto2 25d ago
GOD Orchestrator lmao
2.
by rsoto2 29d ago
probably
3.
by rsoto2 29d ago
I grew up on instant coffee, i don't like it much anymore EXCEPT for tossing a bit and some ice in a protein shake 100% recommend.
4.
by rsoto2 29d ago
the last few years of reading hackernews has been a wild ride. I used to come here for well thought out articles and opinions. IDK if all the "older guard" have left the building or if we've all been consumed by abject stupid
5.
by rsoto2 29d ago
they unironically think that they can replace everyone in an organization
6.
by rsoto2 29d ago
"Thank God I read what it outputted" lmao
7.
by rsoto2 1mo ago
bro the president suggested we nuke a hurricane and raped someone and is dismantling our natural resources, the bar is substantially worse than a couple months technical debt.
8.
by rsoto2 1mo ago
lol "my girlfriend doesn't go here but you wouldn't even believe me if i lied about it" disliking LLMs is just an opinion. Refusing to engage with an argument and instead defaulting to downvotes when you can't suppl
9.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
Figured out a better way of explaining it: dev A knows exactly what the program should do and how to verify the AI output dev B thinks they know what they are doing but are actually misguided by bad psycophantic AI output they have incorrec
10.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
or the AI could lead you to a completely unusable experiment and lead you to believe it was successful wasting weeks of work. Not saying it will happen to you, but there is a huge "survivorship" bias already in software for what t
11.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
lol this is actually my art(slop). I "prompted" it from the internet and it materialized on my screen. I own it, please don't misattribute it.
12.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
Also, he and Flock recently boasted on LinkedIn that they are not shipping face-tracking in some cities. Wow this makes them so much more secure and private right? No it's likely because most people are looking at their phones and they
13.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
They will investigate themselves? Police do not prevent crime and rarely catch criminals, in fact they are often _involved_ in crime. There are scientific approaches to solving crime and larger budgets for more cameras and police tanks is n
14.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
The Flock CEO Garret Langley called people that didn't want his unsecure surveillance state in their own communities "terrorists". A term that has a very loose meaning but is always used to invoke state violence. So he wants
15.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
It does zero good "for me" but hopefully someone thinks twice the next time before expressing such a dumb incorrect opinion. Not sure why adults are such precious little creatures that can't deal with a bit of criticism. If b
16.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
Where's the guidelines about misinforming people which has actual societal implications? Where are the guidelines for openly promoting products that harm people's mental and social health?
17.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
Wow it's almost like modern datacenters use way more power due to GPU consumption. Emit way more pollution. Use way more land. Make way more noise. Produce slop instead of functioning products. Do yall use your brain before chiming in
18.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
Lol the entire pro-data US center is ran by elon musk and the other cronies that bribed the Trump admin to let them violate the clean air act. They use gullible losers that will swallow their propaganda whole and promise them "AGI.&quo
19.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
Yes, the AI Datacenters are much worse for the environment. xAI is using methane-turbines to power theirs, and they are allowed to pollute your communities because they bribed the Trump admin. https://www.theguardian.com/tec
20.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
nice try clammy sammy. We're gonna continue to push for scientific based approaches to education not some lunatic's idea of an educational experiment that waste's children's education. We tried this with Bill Gates alrea
21.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
I mean that's this entire thread in a nutshell. Armchair experts emboldened by their $100 ChatGPT University Diploma.
22.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
No, the rationality of humans is not defined by how gullible they are towards LLMs. Are yall getting your psychology degree from ChatGPT university, my god.
23.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
All AI is flawed and prone to "hallucinations"(doing exactly what it was designed to do) that's why Microsoft considers it an "Entertainment" product.
24.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
"this is akin to givin someone a textbook on an obscure subject that has certain factual errors." My brother all LLMs give factual errors so, no this is not a problem with the study. In your fake experiment you are hypothesizing a
25.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
What capabilities? Regurgitating a collage of training data? Again it's pretty easy to understand why this happens. The "magic" you are perceiving is language itself not these models. Language is a constantly evolving tool an
26.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
Yes. When someone is teaching you language as a baby you have eyes and ears and 100 million nerve endings and constant "training" to understand language. You cannot understand the word "semantics" as a human without this
27.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
a bone box.. with eyes and 100 million nerve endings to experience the world...
28.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
We know exactly how LLMs work. you don't understand how they work and so you think they are free of physical limits like scaling. There are several rudimentary articles on hackernews for you to peruse to understand weights and scalin
29.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
The last part is a bigger issue for me. I can use my usb to charge most of my tech but when it comes to the exact cable that my interface needs to use I now have like 30 cables I have to try before I know which one was the correct one.
30.
by rsoto2 2mo ago
They have no preferences, LLMs spit out what's in the training data or what the filters tell it to do.

More ›