7 ms·
The examples are cherry-picked. I took a photo outside my office window in a built-up area, o3 thought for 5m 7s (!), and it got the location wrong by 40km. Doe
by Kolya 1y ago
The examples are cherry-picked. I took a photo outside my office window in a built-up area, o3 thought for 5m 7s (!), and it got the location wrong by 40km. Doesn't look solved to me.
- sadeshmukh 1y ago40 km is imo pretty impressive, but the 5 minute is really a killer. No use in real time applications
- antonvs 1y agoFor real time applications, GPS seems like it'd be much more useful.
- bpodgursky 1y agoThe military/infosec uses of this are not real time. You can wait 5 minutes for a drone strike.
- tempest_ 1y agoYeah but you also cant be off by 40km with your drone strike.
- dredmorbius 1y agoA 40km radius circle is far smaller than a 1000 km radius circle. Once the guesser's made its attempt, it's more straightforward to either refute the guess entirely, or refine within a probable circle of error.
- hhh 1y ago40km accuracy for something arbitrary is a decent starting point. I can normally get within a few meters within a couple of minutes of most images though.
- dogma1138 1y agoNarrowing it down to even a 100km radius for visint analysts to then pinpoint it down is worth its weight in gold already.
- viraptor 1y agoFor military uses, if the us army doesn't have a much more precise, purpose built model, already trained on both private data and whatever they could get from google and others, I'd be extremely surprised. They will not be using chatgpt for serious things like that. (... or at least I'd be sure about that a few months ago - maybe a bit less now)
- bpodgursky 1y agoThere is not a secret super duper powerful military version of cutting edge consumer technologies. AI is catching everyone with their pants down. You have access to the most powerful computer intelligence on earth, the same ones the NSA and CIA have access to. It's a bizarre world.
- abletonlive 1y agoIf you're going to make such an assertive statement you should maybe backup that claim with some substance. Without such, it's akin to an atheist proudly proclaiming there is definitely no such thing as god.
- wruza 1y agoit's akin to an atheist proudly proclaiming there is definitely no such thing as god Almost feels like you supposed that to sound bad.
- abletonlive 1y agoYes because agnostic atheism is a logically superior belief system, that's much more intellectually honest and ironically: humble.
- wruza 1y agoAren't beliefs secondary guests in discussions about substance? Edit: I'm not even a strict atheist if that matters much, but I wouldn't talk about it in assertive/provemewrong tone anywhere, cause it's not even remotely logical.
- swarnie 1y agoPlease stop indiscriminately murdering us with flying killdroids.
- DonHopkins 1y agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbnDr_IbdIU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbnDr_IbdIU
- TiredOfLife 1y agoStop invading Ukraine
- swarnie 1y agoHaven't done for almost 200 years.
- paulcole 1y agoThat’s also not GeoGuessr.
- casey2 1y agoWere you in a Google street view car when you took the photo?
- nxobject 1y agoDid you glean anything interesting from the chain of thought about why it took so long?