5 ms·
Still way better than a VisionFive 2, and more than enough to get your hands in the thing (especially with the hourly pricing). You have to acknowledge that the
by b9b10eb736 3y ago
Still way better than a VisionFive 2, and more than enough to get your hands in the thing (especially with the hourly pricing). You have to acknowledge that the RISC-V ecosystem isn't as mature as that of ARM64 and AMD64. You don't get the best performance/price ratio with RISC-V (yet). Many extensions were ratified so recently that hardware doesn't even exist (yet).
As far as I'm concerned, the LicheePi 4A from Sipeed which is also equipped with a TH1520 offers a decent value for a RISC-V SBC. If you want more performance than that, it's going to cost you a lot more.
- brucehoult 3y agoRight now, you can't get more performance than the TH1520 (C910 cores) and JH7110 (U74 cores) at ANY price. The only thing you can do is get more of the same cores i.e. SG2042 with 64x C910 cores. The same goes for emulation. QEMU on my i9-13900HX laptop is about the same speed on each core, but there I have 24 cores (32 threads). I just compiled gcc 14 natively on both LicheePi 4A (the same as this hosting) and docker/QEMU: i9-13900HX (8 P + 16 E cores) docker running riscv64/ubuntu image real 101m44.472s user 1695m26.395s sys 24m36.671s LicheePi 4A (TH1520 SoC, 4x C910 cores) real 422m41.367s user 1430m56.638s sys 70m17.994s The LicheePi actually used less CPU time, but the i9 won with more cores.
- b9b10eb736 3y agoThanks for the clarification, you're completely right. I didn't realize the SG2042 used the same core. So, Scaleway's offer really does seem to make sense!
- nevi-me 3y agoThank you all, yes it makes sense to use this as the cost is great for say 3 months worth of tinkering.
- camel-cdr 3y agoArguably OpenXiangShan should be more powerful, but verilog simulation isn't really that usable in practice, and it has no working vector support yet. (the dev branch currently hangs after a few minutes of simulating)