b9b10eb736

18 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by b9b10eb736 2y ago

   Nobody's asking for mainline submissions though. Just publishing the drivers source code under a FLOSS licence when they stop supporting it would be enough to let the community take over the maintenance.
2. 2.▲
   by b9b10eb736 2y ago

   While I'd agree with the general stance of avoiding MongoDB for any new project, I find the statement that postgres always gives better and faster solution dubious. They don't really solve the same problems. If you happen to reall
3. 3.▲
   by b9b10eb736 3y ago

   I works great (with the usual requirement of having the expected kernel options/modules enabled). The main issue right now is the lack of image support for RISC-V. I hope this is going to change if hardware starts becoming accessible.
4. 4.▲
   by b9b10eb736 3y ago

   Thanks for the clarification, you're completely right. I didn't realize the SG2042 used the same core. So, Scaleway's offer really does seem to make sense!
5. 5.▲
   by b9b10eb736 3y ago

   Fully agreed. > The JH7110 is usually about 10% faster on system level real world tasks e.g. building software. Pretty sure the U74 CPU from the JH7110 is way worse than the C910 from the TH1520 on pretty much all aspects. So my guess is
6. 6.▲
   by b9b10eb736 3y ago

   Still way better than a VisionFive 2, and more than enough to get your hands in the thing (especially with the hourly pricing). You have to acknowledge that the RISC-V ecosystem isn't as mature as that of ARM64 and AMD64. You don'
7. 7.▲
   by b9b10eb736 3y ago

   According to my tests, it's billed by the hour with no minimum commitment. It's attractive indeed for transient workloads. €15.99 for one month commitment sounds okay-ish when comparing with competitor's offering at this pric
8. 8.▲
   by b9b10eb736 8y ago

   I totally upvote and agree with your comment. Thanks a lot for working on JIT, that's invaluable. We (as a community) will never thank the PG contributors enough for their work. I'd love to contribute to the postgres project, thou
9. 9.▲
   by b9b10eb736 8y ago

   People are smart enough to install the software and the plugins they need. If only .1% of the users use a feature, it doesn't have to be maintained by the core contributors (and slow down the other 99.9% users from getting important fe
10. 10.▲
    by b9b10eb736 8y ago

    Thanks for replying. Honestly, I expected a more closed and rude answer because I know my opinion on this is quite unpopular. The context of my answer: I love PostgreSQL, I've been using it in production, day-to-day, at work and for pe
11. 11.▲
    by b9b10eb736 8y ago

    "nobody needs" is to take in the unix philosophy sense here. If you take it first degree, you're part of the reason why PG has been missing these essential points for so long (IMHO). In comparison to the items I've liste
12. 12.▲
    by b9b10eb736 8y ago

    From the top of my head, I can list at least four reasons to actually use anything else: - Not distributable - Poor resiliency - Hard to upgrade - Schemas remains at postgres core Every solution to address any of these points in PG are hack