11 ms·
Ask HN: Which project does not have any good open-source alternatives?
Open Source is changing the tech industry. But there are still a lot of space where the closed source proprietary software is the only player.
Can you comment some of the space? So a person who is thinking about creating a new open source project can get the idea and start making a alternative?
- mikewarot 7y agoGoogle Picasa - A photo organizer that works offline, and lets you run facial recognition on your photos to organize and tag them. It has a bug, and sometimes gets labels swapped if you have more than one in a photo, which then metastasizes to corrupt the samples used to compare new photos against. It was awesome, and now it's gone.
- u8mybrownies 7y agoFederated Learning for mobile
- ziotom78 7y agoAdobe Acrobat. Nothing in the open-source world has the same share of easiness in editing PDF files. (Sorry, Okular.) Also, the ability to use the scanner to produce multipage PDF files is unrivalled, IMO.
- whalesalad 7y agoMicrosoft Active Directory
- jdsalaro 7y agoSoftware for VJing, mapping images, light beams, etc to projectors, surfaces or screens.
- qmmmur 7y agoOpen Frameworks?
- caspervonb 7y agoGraphics and Design: * Photoshop, GIMP is great but still a bit rough. * Illustrator, Inkscape is great, but rough. * Maya, Cinema4D: Blender is technically pretty good, UX is improving but still clunky. Even something like Silo would be pretty sweet (a fairly simple, pure 3d modeling program) * Video editing: Is there really anything good out there? Last I tried the programs just straight out crashed.
- ldevs3b 7y agoAs a developer who is getting into the computer hardware tinkering / desktop building hobbies it is very surprising to find an absence of open source alternatives to the popular computer hardware info / benchmarking / stress testing tools used by the community, for the PC / x86 platform at least. Popular hardware info tools like CPU-Z, GPU-Z, HWMonitors are all closed sourced, and benchmarking tools like Cinebench as well. The only open source alternative I was able to find was CPU-X, an alternative to CPU-Z: https://github.com/X0rg/CPU-X https://github.com/X0rg/CPU-X Another example is I recently got interested in purchasing second hand GPUs and most of the cards found online would have their vbios modded for crypto mining, and to restore to a default bios most people would use the ATIFlash / NVFlash utilities from TechPowerUp. I got interested in how such a utility would work for modern GPUs and to no avail, I could not find any open source tools that would demonstrate the capabilities of these tools
- jmercouris 7y agoA good reason why some of the benchmarking software is closed source is because it makes it harder for vendors to design ways to circumvent the point of the tests (which is often to test the speed of the hardware).
- codr7 7y agoTo me that sounds like just another flavor of security through obscurity, as some vendors will undoubtedly get their hands on the information since the stakes are so high, which defeats the entire line of reasoning. If the source was public, at least the playing field would be level.
- zzo38computer 7y agoOne such program is Everett Kaser Software's Hero Mesh puzzle game engine. I have actually started writing Free Hero Mesh for this purpose, though (but it is incomplete). Another is a good alternative to the Microsoft BASIC compiler for DOS. Although there are other BASIC compilers, they miss many things and don't work with real mode.
- bananapear 7y agoThe operating system/firmware which runs on Sonos devices. There was an link on the front page yesterday about “recycle mode” bricking devices to prevent resale. I’m now slightly disgusted that I own one. Sonos hardware has great speakers and great sound, but the software is flaky (especially near microwave ovens) and requires a connection to Sonos servers at all times.
- dominotw 7y agoairtable splunk
- Kye 7y agoMusic production software. Any of the proprietary options is better than the best open source DAW like Audacity or Ardour. Even Reaper gets enough paying customers to have a good combo notation editor/piano roll in it. Open source has produced some good periphery stuff like Helm and MuseScore. LMMS is the best of the bunch when it comes to open source DAWs. That's not to say the open source stuff is bad. I get that they don't have the resources to do as much UX refinement as the others. If you can't afford the proprietary stuff or prefer open source, then you can get by. The actual audio handling systems inside are probably world class.
- memn0nis 7y agoThere was another thread about Aspera on HN the other day.
- based2 7y agohttps://helpwanted.apache.org/ https://helpwanted.apache.org/ https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/campaigns-summaries#hpp https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/campaigns-summaries#hpp
- safwan 7y agoIt is about existing open source projects. It would be better to have some idea about new open source projects that are not started yet but needed by the community.
- Bostonian 7y agoI think businesses with complicated Excel spreadsheets using macros written in VBA may be reluctant to switch to an open source spreadsheet.
- LinuxBender 7y agoThere are some projects that have solutions, but not great ones. My definition of great is something that people with very little technical knowledge can set up themselves, correctly and securely. This is based on my experience, trying to show non technical people how to self host some things. - File, email self hosted and e2e encryption has Nextcloud, but only technical people can set it up. There should be a happy-clicky thing that non technical people could set up and it would force them to do it the right way, because the right way is the easy way. By happy-clicky, I mean, they create an account on any VPS provider, then click "add service", say how big to let it scale to, define what domain name to use and they are done. - Web based chat servers that scale. Again, there are web front-ends, like Convos and TheLounge you can put in front of IRCD, but non technical people don't have the patience to set up IRC networks and put web front-ends on them. If there was a happy-clicky solution that used RPC over HTTPS or something to negotiate clusters and all the person has to do is point DNS to it, then more people would self host chat. - File sharing. If there was something lighter weight than NextCloud that could auto-scale in any VPS provider and could be deployed from each VPS provider, then more people would self host. I almost wrote something like this out of necessity but so many people were using dropbox, I abandoned it. In summary, I think the gap that needs to be filled is to have more projects that integrate into VPS providers (by the VPS provider) and be part of their VM deployment system, so that anyone can deploy them easily. Maybe there could even be a business model around integrating 3rd party services into each of the VPS providers, following some non vendor specific standard, that all the VPS providers could set up. Linode, Vultr, AWS, Azure, Softlayer, OVH, Hetzner, Digital Ocean, etc... and no code specific to any of them. All of them should have a standard API that services can be integrated into and then easily deployed securely and correctly by less than technical people.
- Strom 7y ago> There should be a happy-clicky thing that non technical people could set up and it would force them to do it the right way, because the right way is the easy way. Absolutely! There should be a default configuration path that is easily accessible. That is to say, the non technical user can basically just click Install and answer maybe one question and everything else is automatic with good defaults. Any additional choice will just cause pain, because non technical people won't have the knowledge to make informed choices. > By happy-clicky, I mean, they create an account on any VPS provider, then click "add service", say how big to let it scale to, define what domain name to use and they are done. This is crazy if we're talking about non technical users. A non technical user won't know what a VPS even is. They won't know what a service is or why they should add one. They won't know what scale means. Is it the one in the bathroom? What's a domain name? Supporting federation of hosting with various VPS providers can be useful for advanced technical users but any mention of it should be avoided for a non technical audiance. There has to be a sane default choice made already for all these questions.
- thexa4 7y agoI wasn't able to find an open source alternative to Newrelic APM for ruby. Perforce is also something that's very useful for game development but relatively expensive.
- safwan 7y agoThat is really True. The APM world does not have any good open source alternative, Elastic APM is ok, but I think it is open core, not open source. Sentry is trying to build one, but maybe that will not be also OSI approved license.
- billconan 7y agoWhy’s perforce not replaceable by git?
- thexa4 7y agoFrom what I've seen, perforce is better for storing binary intermediates. Git doesn't work very well with partial or subfolder checkouts which is something you would need if you want to store intermediates. In games intermediates can take multiple hours to build (like maps). Building the game from scratch every commit like it's usually done with git CI tooling does not work very well. We also ran into wanting to give modders access to maps and materials but not to game code.
- cweagans 7y agoPerforce has a locking mechanism for files, which is important for the large binary objects that are used in game development. Git doesn't really have that concept, so it requires more out of band communication to make it work for that use case. Git LFS might handle this, but it's just not something that Perforce shops have to even think about, train their people on, etc. It's just "there" and there's somebody that they can call and yell at if things go wrong.
- yellowapple 7y ago> Git doesn't really have that concept Of locking files? Sure it does; if two people modify the same piece of code, then there will be a merge conflict, and whoever's doing the merge will have the opportunity to reconcile those two versions. It's like a lock, but you don't have to think about it / explicitly lock and unlock the object you're editing. Combine this with rebasing (git-speak for "switch to the branch into which I want to merge and then try applying all the changes from my branch") and you end up with a pretty coherent idea of what changed and in what order. Having used both branch-oriented (like Git) and locking-oriented (not Perforce specifically, but my current dayjob involves very similar version control schemes), I vastly prefer the former. Less ceremony around doing things in parallel, and less risk of development deadlocks (e.g. Alice locked A.cpp for editing, Bob locked B.dds for editing, Alice now wants to edit B.dds, Bob now wants to edit A.cpp, now Alice will have to revert her lock on A.cpp, wait for Bob to do everything he needs to do, then relock A.cpp and redo her changes all over again (probably also having to debug new things because of new bits and pieces Bob added) - or Bob will have to do so for B.dds - and cue fistfight in the breakroom). ---- That all being said, binary files are indeed a weak spot for Git, so if you really do want to version control your textures and models and sounds and such, then sure, perhaps a different VCS tailored for that use-case would be more ideal. In my experience, though, that tends to be an anti-pattern; generally better to keep code and assets separate (I'm well aware that tools/engines like e.g. Unity don't play the slightest bit nicely with that separation), using separate version control systems tailored to the specific content.
- brudgers 7y agoExcel alternatives might be uncountable. Implementing spreadsheet basics is an advanced beginner exercise. But even Google’s billions only get it a distant second best because Microsoft is still working hard despite the lead. Sure Google and Apple can meet most needs most of the time. They’re good enough mainly because they are free beer. Not because they are open source. Obviously. Don’t get me wrong. I’m a GNU fanboy at heart. But I dont believe in magically willing well engineered software into existence. It takes resources fungible with money. Projects with cash are at an advantage. Projects with cash, motivation and years of experience in the codebase are the ones that dominate. Not starting from scratch becomes a huge advantage. A new project in a space needs to find an unserved market segment with resources fungible with money. That’s why successful developers’ tools are easy and CAD programs hard. If you want to make an alternative, just make it and learn from what happens. Because what everyone wants is a free iPhone. Good luck.
- iforgotpassword 7y agoI'm not an Excel user. Genuinely curious: Is it really that the alternatives are worse, lacking features, unstable, or does it come down to "they're not Excel", in that they're not a drop in replacement that can perfectly load and run every Excel sheet ever created. Because that would be my gut feeling: Not interoperable enough, since some things just work differently, but not necessarily much worse. If you can't send your sheets to company b without being sure they can properly use it, it's worthless. Pretty much the same problem with Word.
- pnako 7y agoIt's a very effective form of distributed / peer to peer lock in. Even if you individually (yourself or your company) would be willing to move to some decent alternative (they do exist), you will still be exchanging files with people who are more locked in than you (e.g. banks/finance), because of custom plug-ins, custom macros, etc. If I wanted to compete with Excel I would start with a plugin / add-in or complement tool and work my way from there. Some companies are probably doing it. They're not really replacing Excel itself but capturing some of the value away from Microsoft.
- 7y ago
- sonny9966 7y agoFree LIVE Training Webinar Reveals... "How I Earn Up To $14,444 Per Day Just Sending A Quick Email To People Who Visit My Odd 2 Page Website…! And How You Can Get A Copy Of Everything I Use To Do This For FREE…" http://bit.ly/ILOVEMoney http://bit.ly/ILOVEMoney Hurry Up Very Limited Time FREE FREE FREE
- gary__ 7y agoWhat do people use for self service embedded analytics in SaaS applications?
- safwan 7y agoWhat are the closed source softwares that are used for this purpose?
- dt3ft 7y agoOctopus Deploy
- paulstovell 7y agoIt's free for small teams, and we can invite you to the GitHub org if you are a customer.
- gitgud 7y ago3D CAD software is light years behind in the open source ecosystem, but competing with Solid Works or Auto Desk is a enormous task... Although Blender seems to be catching up in 3D animation!
- safwan 7y agoCAD software like AutoCad does not have any good Open Source alternative. As it is mostly used by Civil Engineers, I think when the Civil Engineers will motivated by the Open Source manifesto, they will approach making soemthing good alternative of CAD software!
- gitgud 7y agoThe crazy part is how expensive CAD software is. AutoCAD can be thousands of dollars a year and was created [1] 37 years ago! The age of the product would surely reveal the difficulty of creating a competing product... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AutoCAD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AutoCAD
- burfog 7y agoCAD is far from just something for civil engineers. It's used by mechanical engineers. It's what you use to design an engine. Good CAD software hooks up to the inventory system so that parts can be ordered automatically. It's used by electrical engineers. Special CAD packages exist for integrated circuit design, magnetics, and antennas. For example a motor might contain coils of wire, permanent magnets, air, and various components through which magnetic field lines are directed. Eddy currents must be analysed. It's used by chemical engineers. Pipes and tanks and pumps get laid out. Stuff like water hammer must be accounted for, except maybe the fluid is poisonous and explosive. Expansion joints for thermal stress and pressure changes might be important. Stress on welds must be calculated.
- mrfusion 7y agoOpenscad? Or that doesn’t do everything?
- 7y ago
- indentit 7y agoManyCam - software that creates a virtual webcam on Windows and thus allows one to: - use one physical webcam in multiple apps simultaneously - switch which physical webcam software is using seamlessly - add live video effects - use a static image or video file as the webcam source (If there is something like this already, then I have missed it!)
- DarrisMackelroy 7y agoOBS Studio has a plugin that enables virtual webcam output on windows. I’ve used it to create a more reliable webcam output from Blackmagic capture cards, as not all software likes to recognize the included webcam driver. https://obsproject.com/forum/resources/obs-virtualcam.539/ https://obsproject.com/forum/resources/obs-virtualcam.539/
- stuntkite 7y agoI've been doing a lot of RGBd scanner stuff in the last few years. "Volumetric Video" as some people call it. The Intel RealSense platform has been a boon and the new Kinect with Linux SDK is cool but with some of the things I've been trying to do to build composite scenes from multiple devices or recordings I hit a wall that could be summed up as lack of virtual webcam support. I haven't hacked on OBS much but have used it quite a bit. This looks like a fantastic example to investigate for useful patterns to leverage. Thanks for sharing!
- pathartl 7y agoNot completely on topic, but I fear we're rapidly losing many video games of yesteryear to time and their closed-source nature. Luckily, milestone games like Doom and Quake were open sourced some time ago. There's reverse engineering of some codebases like Rollercoaster Tycoon, Diablo, and Super Mario 64, but for 99% of games we'll never see them outside of the original release or an emulator.
- muzani 7y agoI learned programming mostly from reverse engineering open source games. Would be great to see this happen more.
- benologist 7y agoI would love to see a pervasive culture of copying proprietary games as open source projects, which we see with a lot of non-game software. Open source should be keeping old games alive and loved, instead old games are being clawed back to re-monetize. There is some open source games, but not many and all the old console games are simple and graphically/audio simple, all the old PC games, it's really only modern AAA titles that have tons of complex assets and would be hard to 'open source clone of X'.
- vertis 7y agoI remember reading some articles[1][2] where it talked about older games where the source code is long lost. [1]: https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2019/06/13/square-enix-digital-preservation-plans-slowed-by-lost-code/ https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2019/06/13/square-enix-digi... [2]: https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1014845/sega-loses-source-code-games https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1014845/sega-loses...
- billconan 7y agophotoshop. Gimp has the functionalities, but its usability is poor.
- katsura 7y agoOne time I started working on one open source alternative, but one big problem I found was that their PSD file documentation was incorrect at a few places, and it lags behind what is currently available. And though Photopea[0] is not open source, it can mostly get things done for my minimal use-cases. [0] https://www.photopea.com/ https://www.photopea.com/
- sahoo 7y agoGive a shot at krita it's good for digital raster art. Not for image processing.
- fernly 7y agoAffinity Photo. https://affinity.serif.com/photo/ https://affinity.serif.com/photo/ OK, not open source! but single-purchase at a reasonable price. Which reduces motivation for an OS replacement.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- jszymborski 7y agoDespite how great Inkscape is, it's no where near Adobe Illustrator or Affinity Designer (and you can't run them on WINE either).
- stuntkite 7y agoIllustrator is such an amazing tool. It's my go to when I need to get an idea out of my notebooks into the digital realm. Website flats, sketching turns of an idea to get into blender, general art. I love the work that the Inkscape team has done and it does do some stuff that illustrator doesn't do easily but it's no where near a replacement for illustrator. I haven't looked but I suspect it's not in their mission statement to be a replacement for Illustrator. Hats off to Adobe for producing the world class tools they produce so consistently for basically the length of my adult life but man I think it would be good if there was something that was aiming to be an open source Illustrator alternative.
- o-__-o 7y agoCisco Cloudcenter.
- funviolence 7y agopalo alto firewall features: apply policy based on AD user or group membership block/apply protocols rather than ports (allow ssh doesn't care what port ssh runs on) advanced url categorization. allow Facebook but disallow Facebook chat etc
- notacoward 7y agoOpen-source data storage is full of gaps compared to its commercial/bespoke brethren. To give just one example, consider multi-tenancy/QoS. Very few OSS distributed filesystems or object stores even seem to have heard of the concept, and those few barely scratch the surface.
- montjoy 7y agoCan you give a better example of what you mean? There are plenty of multi-tenancy file systems. Do you mean QoS by user or over the network?
- notacoward 7y ago> There are plenty of multi-tenancy file systems Name one. What I mean by multi-tenant is that the namespace, security space, capacity quota and I/O quota are fully isolated and managed at the storage-system API, not via other facilities such as cgroups which aren't even applicable beyond a single-host level. Each tenant gets something that looks like a private service with predictable limits (appropriate for an SLA) regardless of what other tenants are doing, despite being on shared infrastructure. Commercial vendors like NetApp and all the "hyperconverged" crowd have support for this kind of isolation at the cluster level, as do some bespoke storage systems such as the one I work on at Facebook, but in the open-source world? Nada.
- montjoy 7y agoOk sure in that context I can’t think of any. The closest thing I know of (with a limited understanding of what you mean) is NFS4.2.
- nomy99 7y agosketch
- georgewsinger 7y agoDon't try to copy a closed-source project. Instead, invent something completely new (something that's 10x better than what it might "replace"), and make it open-source.
- PaulDavisThe1st 7y ago... and half your potential user base will say "what the hell is this crap, it is totally unintuitive and doesn't do the things i need it to" ... sigh.
- rabidrat 7y agoFocus on the other half.
- PaulDavisThe1st 7y agoShe's busy.
- berbec 7y agoExchange. Imap and friends don't provide the seamless functionality that Exchange does. Contacts, calendar, permission sharing, group message folders. You just can't get close. I love OSS, but I have to recommend Exchange because their is no viable alternative.
- montjoy 7y agoThis is true but happily I will never run it again thanks to office 365 and gmail.
- wallacoloo 7y agoVideo editing. There’s Kdenlive and OpenShot that are maybe the most well-established, but they we’re both very buggy the last time I dealt with them, and they’re nowhere near featureful as what’s available commercially. I think we could benefit from a well-know MovieMaker equivalent. Something that isn’t featureful, but is reliable (read: doesn’t crash) and intuitive.
- Jowsey 7y agoPiggybacking on this, a version of After Effects for Linux would allow me to completely switch from Windows. There's a few video editors for Linux to rival things like Premiere but no proper FX/GFX editors with things like particles, audio spectrums, all the nice-to-haves. Once I can create the flashy animation style stuff I regularly create and not just Windows XP Movie Maker-level animations, I'd pay any price and switch to Linux in a heartbeat.
- slenk 7y agoThis. I so want something as good as Adobe Premier because I can't justify paying monthly for it, but i am always disappointed.
- slantyyz 7y agoThe low-end video editing market also hasn't been satisfied with closed source proprietary software either. Yes, there are a lot of players, especially on the Windows side in the under $100 price range, but nothing I've used has been comparable to iMovie on the Mac. It's the one void that hasn't been filled for me since switching from Mac to Windows. I've purchased Cyberlink PowerDirector, Corel VideoStudio and Premiere Elements, and I didn't find them to be very good. There's too much of a sloppy "kitchen sink" mentality to them. I actually found Windows Movie Maker to be better than the aforementioned products, but that got discontinued without a replacement for quite some time. There's now a "Video Editor" application which is part of "Photos" that is serviceable, but I would gladly pay a Windows app that is akin to iMovie - simple, focused and functional.
- pinouchon 7y agoI'am about to try DaVinci Resolve as an alternative to Premiere (I used Premiere in the past). But I don't want to fork $20 per month because I don't use it that often. A good opensource video editing software (or NLE non-linear editing as they call it) would be great.
- m_ke 7y agoUber/Seamless/Postmates/Airbnb or any other middleman service. There's no reason why they should be getting away with extracting 30-40% of the revenue for facilitating a simple transaction.
- jsf01 7y agoAnd despite all that they’re still unprofitable. How would this be feasible as an open source project?
- m_ke 7y agoBecause they're blowing insane amounts of money fueling unsustainable growth to satisfy their investors. This requires burning cash on user acquisition and hiring thousands of engineers to solve problems that they didn't need to have. Craiglist is handling as much traffic as all of them with around 50 employees.
- chrisshroba 7y agoDoesn’t this ignore all the regulatory hurdles these companies have had to deal with to be able to be that middleman? Uber, for example, has done a whole lot of work, not all legal, to get cities to agree to let them operate. I suspect that a few kids in a garage trying to be the next Uber are going to end up stumped when cities tell them no (and they won’t have the lobbying power to make cities reconsider)
- m_ke 7y agoI'm saying that we could use an open alternative for existing services, not that an open solution should have been first. Uber spent a lot on lawyers and broke a lot of laws to clear the hurdles, making it much easier for someone to come in and provide a similar service at a fraction of the cost. There's no reason why someone building an open solution couldn't work with the cities and get their endorsement.
- ailideex 7y agoAnd yet with taking 30-40% of revenue (as you claim) Uber is still running at a loss.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- Mizza 7y agoTwo that I have encountered: Aspera: a high-performance data transfer suit, used in genetics and the film industry. I wrote a blog post about it a year ago and still get near-daily emails asking me if there is an open source alternative yet. QUIC may provide a basis for a solution, but it needs to be explored. PDMS: software for planning, modeling and simulating oil and gas plants. Main two commercial suites are AVEVA PDMS and Autocad Plant 3D. AVEVA PDMBS is upwards of $1,000 per seat per month (!), so not feasible for projects which I have in mind (more on that in the new year). I'd imagine that Blender could be used as a starting point for a Free alternative, but I'm not sure. This is a tougher one. [1] https://www.ccdatalab.org/blog/a-desperate-plea-for-a-free-software-alternative-to-aspera https://www.ccdatalab.org/blog/a-desperate-plea-for-a-free-s...
- kvz 7y agotus.io can saturate network connections reliably and in a resumable way, I wonder what more you would require that makes Aspera stand out as the only way to fly? (honest question, and full disclosure: tus core author)
- spectramax 7y agoOpen source projects tend to emerge when there is general access to the purpose of that project. You can't expect an open source project for Ocean-based Wind Turbine simulation or molecular synthesis of Organochloride compounds. They're niche industries that require tremendous amount of upfront investment, in both physical assets to realize the utility of the open-source project, and knowledge-base required to operate the software. On the other hand, you could have a piece of software that requires niche knowledge but its used literally everywhere - for e.g. OpenSSL. Not many people can contribute to it, yet it exists as open source. The point I am trying to make is that OpenSSL and your quantum hardware control software are very different things.
- indigodaddy 7y agoSomething like Cabinet Vision also too niche? Don't think there are really any serious open source contenders in that space.
- ken 7y agoWhat’s your scope? One obvious answer is Google search.
- starpilot 7y agoSAP, other annoying enterprise software.
- safwan 7y agoOdoo is good alternative
- wskemper 7y agoI'm surprised no one has said "PowerPoint" yet. LibreOffice and Google Slides are nowhere close. Animations, theming, diagramming tools... I run an Ubuntu laptop and have been missing PowerPoint so much I tried to get a Windows VM for it. Couldn't get graphics support in VirtualBox working correctly :(
- copperx 7y agoI find PowerPoint to be the most easily replaceable program in the Office suite because effective presentations do not depend on cool animations or themes to get the message accross. The best presentations I've seen have had black text on a plain white background with clear and precise language. Either that or presentations that only consist of images or diagrams and no text.
- absorber 7y agoAbleton Live and/or Bitwig Studio I don't think anything comes even remotely close to the level of productivity and rapid experimentation / prototyping these DAWs can bring to the table.
- Mizza 7y agoIt's not quite the same thing, but VCV Rack is making incredible and rapid progress into becoming a fully fledged DAW. I find myself using Ableton less and less and Rack more and more. Check it out!
- absorber 7y agoYes, I'm aware of VCV Rack and it is an amazing open source project. I use Bitwig Studio though, and having The Grid there (which is Bitwig's own modular environment, introduced in v3) is just too convenient to use another one next to it.
- xpasky 7y agoMy dad aches after a good and powerful typesetting tool (for less technical users than *TeX is aimed at), in the vein of the Ventura Publisher of old. Nowadays it seems all about Adobe Indesign but the workflows seem inferior for many book-type workloads. Scribus needs a lot of help.
- tmaly 7y agoVideo editing. Adobe Premiere Pro or Final Cut Pro. I guess the price might not be that high to justify, but still I have not seen anything like these as open source.
- w3clan 7y agocheckout "davinci resolve", "kdenlive"
- mwattsun 7y agoThis article about how Microsoft Access won't die got me thinking about creating an open source alternative. I just retired and am looking for a project. I also have a history with msft that might be helpful. https://medium.com/young-coder/microsoft-access-the-zombie-database-software-that-wont-die-5b09e389c166 https://medium.com/young-coder/microsoft-access-the-zombie-d...
- burmer 7y agoYes! scrolled all the way down for this. In the non-tech world, a GUI/form builder + relational database that was extendible through a decent scripting language all in one package would be huge.
- taneq 7y agoIf there's a real, useful OSS alternative to Access then let me know. Otherwise you might be onto something!
- mwattsun 7y agoMaybe the new "open" Microsoft will put it up on GitHub. Probably not though. I imagine the code base is a mess at this point
- grandinj 7y agoOr you could help fix up Libreoffice Base which badly needs some love
- ta999999171 7y agoCan someone explain what's going on with that project?
- mamcx 7y agoThis is my pet peeve. I'm already working in a relational language (http://tablam.org http://tablam.org) to use as the core. My dream is to have not only an Access/Excel(in the role of pseudo-table programming) alternative, but one that could work great in a iPad/mobile device. Also, in this space, most "options" are fully on the cloud. Thats cool, but will never be a real challenger to Access or Excel if depend on cloud 100%. I need it to work fully standalone. My first programming language was FoxPro. I know what it look like to "live the dream". One single language and environment and you TRULY code ALL the app: Db, logic, forms, reports, web services, etc. --- BTW: why start with a relational lang? The MAIN power of the dbase/fox family above access was to have a truly tailored language for the task. With office, you MUST work from a paradigm (Access:Relational, Excel:Reactive functional) and become an inferior procedural maybe OO developer (VBA) to finish stuff. The dissonance is heavy.
- realcr 7y agoA decent wysiwyg website builder.
- chadcmulligan 7y agoAre there any? Why not square space and so on?
- realcr 7y agoIsn't square space a paid solution? https://www.squarespace.com/pricing https://www.squarespace.com/pricing
- sansnomme 7y agoHigh level multiphysics, RF, and CAD tools and simulators. Autodesk, Ansys etc. still dominate the field. The state of tools like OpenFoam is like the early days of Gimp and KiCad; theoretically possible to use but only if your background is in software engineering and/or if you are really, really poor and desperate e.g. a grad student on a tight budget. If you look at software like open source FTDT sims, almost all requires specifying layouts, project settings, and designs in ridiculously long config files that would put JS build tools to shame. If you are lucky, you might be able to design your model using a proper GUI e.g. Gmsh. If you are not, be prepared to start drawing out your model with a text editor, point by point. Imagine creating SVGs by hand, that's how ludicrous it is. Most of the "open source" stuff are grad projects, more of an exercise in show and tell than anything serious. Sure it is perfectly possible to specific the cross section of an airplane wing by hand. By the time you are done with that your colleagues using proper GUI tools have already ran their simulation and published three papers. For those who are interested, one promising project is SU2: https://su2code.github.io/ https://su2code.github.io/
- kwk1 7y agoOne of the goals of the FreeCAD project [1] is to be a high-level interface for tools like OpenFOAM (via the CfdOF workbench [2]), and other solvers/meshers like CalculiX, Elmer, Gmsh, and Netgen. Its modular, workbench-based, Python-around-C++ core approach provides an environment for people to make their own specialized tools, like the Arch Rebar tool [3] that was created as part of a Google Summer of Code project. [4] like airfoil design as you mentioned. There was a recent forum thread started by people interested in doing exactly that. [5] [1] https://freecadweb.org/ https://freecadweb.org/ [2] https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewforum.php?f=37 https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewforum.php?f=37 [3] https://www.freecadweb.org/wiki/Arch_Rebar https://www.freecadweb.org/wiki/Arch_Rebar [4] https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?t=22760 https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?t=22760 [5] https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=41159&start=10 https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=41159&start...
- afarrell 7y ago> interface What are some ways that FreeCAD can solve the problem of paying the rent of people who walk around holding their users' business problems and UI frustrations in their head?
- DoofusOfDeath 7y agoI think the definition of "good" matters a lot here. Consider Adobe's Photoshop and Lightroom. Many people (including me) would love to see those supported on Linux, or even better, be out-classed by open-source software, e.g. Gimp and Darktable. Gimp and Darktable truly are wonderful pieces of software. But they aren't yet compelling enough to cause a mass-migration by professional photographs. Another example would be Microsoft Office vs. LibreOffice. So you may need to refine your goals a little: Do you want to (a) fill a gap where no viable OSS exists, or (b) help OSS dethrone proprietary software in some category, e.g. Photoshop? > So a person who is thinking about creating a new open source project can get the idea and start making a alternative? I cringe when I read that, because I've asked that question many times for myself, and I never ended up following through. I think there's some wisdom in the notion that the best OSS project idea is one that solves a problem you have. Otherwise it's just too hard to really see it through.
- alt_f4 7y ago> Gimp and Darktable truly are wonderful pieces of software Let's not kid ourselves -- Gimp is an unusable bag of crap.
- safwan 7y ago> So you may need to refine your goals a little: Do you want to (a) fill a gap where no viable OSS exists, or (b) help OSS dethrone proprietary software in some category, e.g. Photoshop? Filling a gap where not OSS exists. I was trying to understand the gap. Like, many people are saying there are huge gap in CAD technologies, but this can be only solved by the persons who have domain knowledge, like Civil Engineers. Unless the people having the domain knowledge does not agree to volunteer or take the inatiative, no one will see any progress in that field. > I think there's some wisdom in the notion that the best OSS project idea is one that solves a problem you have Yeah, it is true. Like I am facing about a problem with APM that there are no or open core alternative of proprietary. Untill this post, I did not know other people are also thinking about its need.
- jart 7y agoPeople do volunteer and take initiative. Then they get hired by Adobe.
- ufmace 7y agoThere's tons of highly specialized vertical market software that will basically never have open-source alternatives. Every industry has a few examples. I at least know of the high-end CAD, FEA, and CFD software used in certain branches of engineering. See Ansys, Autodesk, etc. The reason why is that building this type of software correctly requires an immense amount of domain knowledge. That type of knowledge doesn't come together in a useful way without a lot of money. Such software also doesn't get used enough to be trustworthy as far as results without some other big companies using it to do things with and testing the results. What company is going to trust their product designs to the results of a bunch of open-source code with no company standing behind it?
- afarrell 7y ago> with no company standing behind it One misinterpretation of this mindset I have heard: "They just want someone who they can sue if things go wrong." If my business depends on something, I want to know that attention is being paid to it.
- ufmace 7y ago"They just want someone who they can sue if things go wrong." is true, but phrased in a rather hostile/negative way. The more positive way to say the same thing is, that because the company building the software knows they can be sued, and is not some fly-by-night operation that will vanish at the first sign of trouble, they have a strong incentive to make sure their software is high-quality and free of critical bugs. That incentive has proved to work well in the commercial world. Much better than, well this open source software has a critical bug, I sure hope somebody feels like opening a PR to fix it before our deadline. Or we could spend a few million bucks to spin up an in-house software development department to fix it ourselves, when that isn't our primary line of business. Or we could just spend a few thousand a seat to buy something proven, that somebody we can trust, and who is liable to be sued and has something to lose, is standing behind. Dirt cheap compared to the other options.
- jbay808 7y agoI don't understand why there isn't an industrial consortium supporting an open source CAD standard. Enough companies depend on proprietary software that they already pay a fortune for that they could front the cost of software development to save money in the long run.
- znpy 7y agoObject databases. Strictly speaking, Versant object database by Actian (iirc) is the only long standing player and the only actually working implementation.
- sterlind 7y agoYES! my first job used an in-house object database, and it was magical (though everyone else seemed to hate it.. I think they were just using it wrong.) It had UML schema, Paxos replication, fine-grained transactions, cardinality checking, reversible upgrades, etc. Application code ran in-process with the database, and it made it really eady to do anything. I'd love to contribute to an open-source version but probably can't since I've read its code. P.S. It fell out of favor because the systems that used it tended to be monoliths that did too much to scale well. The "right way to do it," IMHO is to build a central stateful brain with it, kick all asynchronous work out to stateless worker microservices and read from active secondaries. If the brain's only job is to mutate state by applying business logic, you can scale quite far.
- villasv 7y agoJenkins (https://jenkins.io/ https://jenkins.io/), but specially most of its plugins. I know it's already open source, but it lacks good FOSS alternatives.
- indentit 7y agoA Lego-CAD tool for touchscreens i.e. Android tablets. I've used LeoCAD on Linux, which isn't bad but finding parts is a nightmare. And the existing non-OSS alternative on Android, Draw Bricks, doesn't support many special bricks like those from Simple Machines.
- newhotelowner 7y agoHotel PMS & operation. We pay roughly $7000 per year. If I want api access it cost additional $700 per year. It took them 9 months to transfer the licence when I bought the property.
- ta999999171 7y agoDo you have an email address I can get in touch with you on?
- mxuribe 7y agoI'm curious, what is "PMS" in this context? Would you kindly explain a tiny bit more?
- nwmcsween 7y agoMany ERP systems do this and are open source, look at odoo for example
- eb0la 7y agoI worked for a company that developed mobile apps for big companies. One of those apps was for a Hotel chain, and the developers complained that the PMS API was _horrible_. In order to make the app usable, the company had to develop a backend to cache everything the PMS returned (mostly was static content).
- bsder 7y ago> We pay roughly $7000 per year. Erm, nobody is going to jump up and down to replace that software if that's all you have to pay. You can't get people to work on replacing Cadence, and that's a license that is on the order of $1 million per person per year.
- dualogy 7y agoI see some ~100 products at https://www.cadence.com/en_US/home/tools/tools-a-z.html https://www.cadence.com/en_US/home/tools/tools-a-z.html -- which one(s) did you have in mind?
- eitland 7y agoGoogle Desktop Search (it is dead now anyway). Was brilliant while it lasted. There were some other alternatives as well but I think GDS starved them to death before Google got bored and killed GDS. (Please le me know if there are good alternatives, free/paid/open source, everything is interesting as long as they fo the same things GDS did and can convince me that they don't upload my data.)
- yazan94 7y agoI personally use an app called Everything[1] since I moved to win10. Win10's search indexing seems to be trash and its tendency to prioritize web results over desktop results is infuriating. Everything is good for finding something tucked away on your hard drive(s), is dead simple to use (give it a few minutes the first time around to index everything, then just search). I wish I could replace the existing Cortana with it or something else rather than opening a different app, but alas When in Windows, do as Microsoft demands. [1] https://www.voidtools.com/ https://www.voidtools.com/
- ytg 7y agoCombine this with Wox Launcher and you can find any file in seconds with a few key strokes. https://github.com/Wox-launcher/Wox https://github.com/Wox-launcher/Wox
- copperx 7y agoIt's amusing how simple Everything is: it just searches the file database in Windows by name. It doesn't search file contents. I am not sure why this isn't the way Windows search works.
- scholia 7y agoI use Everything all day every day and it's brilliant at what it does. However, it's not Google Desktop Search, which I sorely miss...
- tbt43p 7y agoeverything is a windows desktop search engine you can use docfetcher for a full content indexing of your files like pdf or doc
- butz 7y agoDual pane file manager with GUI, in other words: a proper alternative to Total Commander on Linux. Fast, simple UI, has all required functionality built in and can be extended using plugins. Krusader is probably closest one, but still has few minor paper cut issues.
- apjana 7y agonnn with dvtm - https://github.com/jarun/nnn https://github.com/jarun/nnn Even without dvtm you can have mutiple contexts. nnn is extremely fast with tons of features. Many plugins are available already and it's easy to add new ones.
- BozeWolf 7y agoMidnight commander maybe?;-) Semi joke. It is quite a nice file manager. Terminal based though. No plugins, but batteries included.
- zerr 7y agoDouble Commander?
- j88439h84 7y agoRanger is great. https://ranger.github.io/ https://ranger.github.io/ It supports single- and multi-pane modes. https://github.com/ranger/ranger/blob/master/ranger/config/rc.conf#L23-L28 https://github.com/ranger/ranger/blob/master/ranger/config/r...
- jimbob45 7y agoThe IDA disassembler is pretty irreplaceable. Or at least it was until the NSA released Ghidra - I haven't tried it to know. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_Disassembler https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_Disassembler
- TACIXAT 7y agoI feel Binary Ninja (closed source) is kicking both their asses in terms of UI and API. Ghidra feels really dated to me. IDA is incredibly expensive. Another open source alternative would be radare.
- _bxg1 7y agoGUI clients for SVN. There are plenty for git, but when I started working at an SVN company I had no luck finding a free one. Ended up paying for SmartSVN, which is okay but still not as good as even some of the OSS git clients.
- rollcat 7y agoFind out if a git-svn bridge would help you. Back in the days, if you're an Emacs guy - I've found magit-svn to be excellent.
- chadcmulligan 7y agoHave you tried TortoiseSVN? A lot of IDE's have an SVN interface - Appcode, IntelliJ, Xcode, Delphi etc
- krilly 7y agoI'm not sure how similar it is, but TortoiseHg is the best version control GUI I've used
- lanius 7y agofoobar2000 (media player for Windows)
- vladimir-y 7y agohttps://github.com/DeaDBeeF-Player/deadbeef https://github.com/DeaDBeeF-Player/deadbeef
- _bxg1 7y agoThere might be an opening for an OSS alternative to game engines like Unity and Unreal. There are scores of open-source game frameworks out there, but there's nothing I'm aware of that comes close to the ease-of-use and cross-platform-build support that Unity has. Of course, you might have an uphill battle because both of the above are free for smaller projects and have fairly generous pricing models that scale based on income.
- nona 7y agoWhat about Godot?
- krilly 7y agoGodot is what you are talking about. It seems to be doing very well. It's MIT licensed, and has official support for C#, C++ and their own Lua-like scripting language.
- skocznymroczny 7y agoGodot might be it in the future... but not yet. It seems to focus on 2D for now, almost all the showcase games for it are 2D also. I don't think it's been battletested enough in 3D yet.
- abetusk 7y agoSuperpowers [1] tried to fill this niche though I don't know how successful it was. [1] http://superpowers-html5.com/index.en.html http://superpowers-html5.com/index.en.html
- throwawaycuriou 7y agohttps://godotengine.org/ https://godotengine.org/
- bchanudet 7y agoEarlier this year I discovered Xenko [1]. I didn't test it personally, but I was quite impressed with the features provided, and the game editor looks like a mix between Unity and Unreal Engine. The 3D engine seems a little bit better than Godot, from what I've seen. Though there is no support for Linux/MacOS yet, and mobile is done through Xamarin, that may come with its own ball of bugs. [1] http://xenko.com/ http://xenko.com/
- rpastuszak 7y agoSketch, Figma
- qualqual 7y agoQualitative Data Analysis systems. RQDA and QualCoder are under development, but the pace is generally slow and many features are buggy and remain untested on common operating systems. Some products out there on the market are better than others (I use MaxQDA) but come at a hefty price, even with a student discount. Also transcription software. Not voice recognition, but software that assists with manual transcription. I'm amazed that no open source alternative to F5 exists out there, since it's a relatively simple mechanism (keyboard shortcuts to denote speaker, paste timestamp, include annotations, etc and ability spool back to rewind 2 seconds).
- jdsalaro 7y agoWouldn't creating a plugin for the likes of VLC or contributing directly to OpenShot be a better idea?
- ccbogel 7y agoHi, qualcoder developer here. Yes qualcoder has some bugs, and limited testing on Mac OS or Windows for now. However, thanks for the advice regards manual transcription with key shortcuts, I will try and incorporate that idea. There is another free qual web-based product called Taguette www.taguette.org which you might be interested in.
- vaibhavsagar 7y agoDJ software! AFAICT Mixxx is the strongest player in this space, and it doesn't hold a candle to Serato/Traktor.
- anotheryou 7y ago- pdf editor
- newnewpdro 7y agoI've used xournal for rudimentary edits like preparing tax forms.
- bori5 7y agoSimulink
- metah 7y agoVLC
- Madeindjs 7y agoIt's already a FOSS software : https://www.videolan.org/vlc https://www.videolan.org/vlc
- m_ke 7y agoAn open source API compatible alternative to CUDA / CUDNN would be great. Nvidia owns the deep learning ecosystem due to CUDNN.
- based2 7y agoA real alternative to Outlook/Exchange/Active Directory.
- krilly 7y agoHere are two projects which are doable, I think: - Paint.net: freeware windows mspaint replacement. Lightweight and simple UI, but powerful features and extensions system. I hate having to boot up GIMP just for editing a screenshot or something, but no other decent libre paint alternative exists - SketchUp: this is to blender what paint.net is to GIMP. Super easy and intuitive to create simple models. A joy to use.
- pnako 7y agoThere is an open source clone of Paint.net called Pinta, based on the original source code of Paint.net. It's not actively developed anymore, though.
- alexfromapex 7y agoMicrosoft Office because as soon as OpenOffice succeeded in supporting the formats Microsoft updated to pptx, docx, etc. because they know it’s one of the few things keeping people stuck with Windows machines for business.
- creimers 7y agoairtable
- sehugg 7y agoFPGA tools, with few exceptions (IceStorm, SymbiFlow)
- linuxlizard 7y agoYeah, EDA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_design_automation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_design_automation) is way behind. There are VHDL and some Verilog but from what (little) I understand, the industry has moved to SystemVerilog and there Free (as in Speech) tools haven't caught up.
- jeena 7y agoConfluence, Jira, Photoshop
- tdewitt 7y agoAgreed for two out of three but I've never used Photoshop. I think it's worse for confluence. There are viable alternatives to jira but I've found nothing even "good enough" to replace confluence and it sets a very low bar.
- atemerev 7y agokdb+ time series database. An installation can cost >150,000 dollars per year... for a 300 kB executable (yes, kilobytes). And it's worth it.
- abetusk 7y agoHere's my list: * Mood tracking software (e.g. Daylio [1]). Put owners in charge of their data for easy export and sharing * Paper craft unfolding (e.g. Pepakura). Allow for 'automagic' unfolding but also user selectable joining/splitting of triangular islands. * Machine learning oriented games (e.g. GWAP [3] (now defunct)). Open source games that allow for open data collection that can then be fed back into the community for machine learning. * I've heard architecture software is abysmal and has no open source alternatives * In browser CAD (e.g. OnShape [4]). In browser lowers the bar to accessibility. * Photogrammetry/3d Scanning. There might be some open source alternatives but nothing that is as easily accessible as the David Scanner [5]. * Projection mapping. Again, there might be some open source alternatives but nothing that I've seen where I can buy a 'kit' with intuitive software to get up and running quickly (though I haven't looked too much in depth). * Ultrasound machine. There's echOpen [6] but I don't know the status of that project. * DNA sequencer. There was the Polonator [7] but it never became 'open source' and eventually died. --- [1] http://daylio.webflow.io/ http://daylio.webflow.io/ [2] https://tamasoft.co.jp/pepakura-en/ https://tamasoft.co.jp/pepakura-en/ [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human-based_computation_game https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human-based_computation_game [4] https://www.onshape.com/ https://www.onshape.com/ [5] https://www8.hp.com/us/en/campaign/3Dscanner/overview.html?jumpid=va_t1345uf8k6 https://www8.hp.com/us/en/campaign/3Dscanner/overview.html?j... [6] http://www.echopen.org/ http://www.echopen.org/ [7] http://arep.med.harvard.edu/Polonator/ http://arep.med.harvard.edu/Polonator/
- krick 7y agoIt's harder to names ones that do, really. It's easy to find some "alternative" to most famous software packets, but despite people repeatedly naming all the same programs (known to pretty much anyone interested anyways), none of them can replace, say, photoshop. So, out of my head (and, yeah, all of them have "alternatives" no serious user would ever switch to): Ableton Live Adobe Photoshop Adobe Premiere AutoCAD Microsoft Office (Excel in particular) Google Calendar (self-hosted) VisualStudio of Jetbrains IDEs
- monoideism 7y ago> Adobe Photoshop They’re not open source, but quite a few graphic designers are switching from Adobe products like Photoshop and Illustrator to Affinity products like Photo and Designer. So Adobe is open to competitors, but they have to be very well executed (Affinity products are well-executed). Also, it’s my opinion that (open-source) Inkscape is slowly closing in on Adobe Illustrator (and Affinity Designer). Not there yet, by any measure, but on its way.
- hiram112 7y ago> Jetbrains IDEs The Community Edition of IntelliJ, at least, from which all the others derive (I believe) is open source. https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community
- krick 7y agoBut you'll still spend money on PhpStorm (or whatever) and for a good reason. Besides, community edition very much does have open source alternatives: I cannot think of a reason it couldn't be replaces by, say, Eclipse. So it doesn't really mean anything.
- trynewideas 7y agoRe: Photoshop in particular, the better question might be "What alternatives are there to Photoshop _for a specific task or workflow_?" Photoshop does 3D modeling, animation, photo retouching, RAW processing, prepress, vector drawing, typography, and automation _before_ adding functionality that exists only in PS-compatible plugins. The component tasks all have alternatives, but nothing does all of those things in a unified interface, and _that's_ the feature where there's no real OSS alternative. (Although I'm tempted to say "Blender does" just to see what would happen.)
- codingslave 7y agoGoogle search
- smbullet 7y agoAnyone know if any of the FL Studio alternatives are good?
- hashworks 7y agoOneNote. There is only Xournal(pp) with a much smaller featureset and more bugs.
- aaron695 7y agoClipboard manager Given the hugely abstract data driven world we live in and the inability of the human brain to have long term cache it should be important. Open source versions exist but they are simply not up to scratch to paid versions, they are simply crap to be honest. Most paid versions have demo modes to see whats good but even the paid versions could do with improvements. Don't get bogged down in making it work online. Keep it simple, runs locally. Windows or maybe if possible Android.
- lolinder 7y agoOut of curiosity, what do you need out of a clipboard manager that Ditto (Windows) or CopyQ (cross-platform) don't offer?
- tpfour 7y agoThere is no good FOSS or even just open source RIS (Radiology Information System).
- lightedman 7y agoVideo chat like Paltalk and CamFrog. Specifically, one that will let you run your own server (Camfrog no longer allows this) and others may connect to it through a public directory or via direct IP address. With unlimited camera feeds able to be opened.
- ralphc 7y agoSalesforce CRM? Hosted CRM, with software for customization, built in database, all that. Although I haven't looked around at alternatives.
- tony 7y ago- HiDPI support in desktops Open source makes it hard. Too many choices. Apple and Microsoft have an army and can decide an API from the top down and have an organization put resources into making a consistent experience. Windows 10 and macOS have absolutely beautiful scaling. On Linux, fractional scaling crashes often. Wayland and Xorg having to handle it separately adds further fragmentation. PopOS is nice: https://system76.com/pop https://system76.com/pop. - Mail clients with streamlined UI's: Geary is as close as you can get to Airmail (macOS) and Mailbird (Windows) - Window snapping: Aero snap in Windows, Magnet in macOS. Gnome doesn't want to do quarter scaling, despite it being a common sense request, and the extensions don't like gTile don't use the same behavior at all - so basically it doesn't exist. (Correction, Gnome seems open to doing it but needs help? https://www.reddit.com/r/gnome/comments/b7f3rl/any_future_plans_for_quarter_tiling/ejuj9si/ https://www.reddit.com/r/gnome/comments/b7f3rl/any_future_pl...) On the other hand, Linux has amazing: - PDF readers. Every desktop environment seems to have its own PDF reader that does a better job than any proprietary one. Okular, evince, mupdf, xpdf. Any they're lite. Zero bloat. - Package management. Every distros package management experience and their stock beats any app store. They don't force you to login. - Terminals. Kitty is fantastic (https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/ https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/) - Input: ibus and fcitx - Access / Installing shared libraries and headers. No need to download xcode or grab Visual C++ - Not open source, but Spotify, Chrome, Slack, Firefox, Steam all work good
- l0b0 7y agoFocus on what you know. Make sure your team includes at the very least (in no particular order): - Someone who is part of the target audience. They should be able to provide your team with a good idea of the features you absolutely need to get started, and might be a good source of ideas for differentiating features. - Someone great at manual quality assurance - user testing, poking the system through the laughably complex and diverse devices we all use, and ideally translating manual test scripts to automated ones, where possible. Lots of software has massive amounts of features hidden behind a broken UI. - Someone great at UX, in particular related to the type of UI you are building. Web UX is not the same as desktop or API UX. - Someone great at automated quality assurance - TDD, CI/CD, linting, fuzzing, code & user metrics, telemetry, performance and stress testing. They keep your progress from stalling over time. - Someone trusted by the entire team to plan, direct and arbitrate. They avoid double work, keep the team going in the same direction, and keep interactions human rather than textual (which has far too low bandwidth to avoid conflict in the long term). For most features you'll want all of these involved in the planning at the same time (and place, if at all possible), to get the most out of everyone's time. They'll all be able to see how the work fits together and will provide unforeseen insights and questions crucial to building an excellent product.
- wideasleep1 7y agoGoogle Cloud Messenger/Firebase.
- larkin221 7y agoPeter Navarro Mayor of LA 2022. He will stop LAPD Crimebuster Vigilante Anti-Homeless Violence and end Cal AG Becerra Corruption
- bobosha 7y agoI feel Teamviewer needs an open-source alternative. Many(all?) of the current remote access tools are nowhere near as simple/easy to use as Teamviewer, hence it continued popularity.