zelly

9 ms·

1.
by zelly 3y ago
Seems cool but mosh already exists
2.
by zelly 3y ago
Shortages lead to gluts. Get ready.
3.
by zelly 3y ago
I remember celebrating when it died but looking back it wasn’t so bad. At least from a dev perspective, working with a batteries-included sdk from a single vendor is a lot nicer than this node_modules cancer.
4.
by zelly 3y ago
LUKS doesn’t have this problem. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, it’s a matter of time before Windows runs on the Linux kernel. It’ll just be this big monoculture like Chromium with browsers. There really isn’t any reason to dupli
5.
by zelly 3y ago
You’re joking right
6.
by zelly 3y ago
Dead wrong. GPT4 is scary good. I think it will replace frontend web dev.
7.
by zelly 3y ago
You’re being rational and using logic. Unfortunately that’s not how markets and valuations work.
8.
by zelly 3y ago
$10M to host a listing of pdfs. lol let me do it.
9.
by zelly 3y ago
This is the kind of thing you can only trust the compiler to do. And we already have goroutines.
10.
by zelly 3y ago
No. Please no.
11.
by zelly 3y ago
I wanted to make something like this, but using Bluetooth LE. Then I looked at the Bluetooth spec and implementations realized why Bluetooth applications are so unreliable (other than Apple device to Apple device). It’s really hard. Plus e
12.
by zelly 3y ago
No. It’s dead, Jim. (That said, it’s better than Python by miles, but it suffers from the same curse as Lisp.)
13.
by zelly 4y ago
So when do we get the worldwide 0-day caused by a malicious crates package?
14.
by zelly 4y ago
It seems people still have not grasped free software. You could have full control over your computing experience, limited only by your abilities.
15.
by zelly 4y ago
AI in those days was completely academic, so they used the in vogue academic language. It was a tribal thing—the same way HN gets excited when they see Rust. AI in the 1980s was centered around MIT, where everyone knew Lisp (actually Scheme
16.
by zelly 4y ago
Correct. The best use case for Web Components is to ship a bloat-free, reusable widget that doesn't care whether a consumer uses it with React, Vue, vanilla JS, Angular, etc.
17.
by zelly 4y ago
If you're using a framework like lit-html as the author recommends, it will replace the string every update. Most people will prefer that way since it's more ergonomic and similar to React. You could do imperative DOM updates, but
18.
by zelly 4y ago
RxJS aka the reason so many websites take 100MB of memory nowadays Don't use it
19.
by zelly 4y ago
The problem with Web Components is it's slower than React or other vDOM implementations. Also everything is a string. To re-render, you have to manipulate the innerHTML--usually replacing the string every update. To pass a prop to a co
20.
by zelly 4y ago
This is neat but for convenience not performance. The bottleneck is in the kernel more than anything else. Probably it has the same latency as nginx, modulo safety checks. I would also recommend uWebSockets for an easy-to-embed web server.
21.
by zelly 5y ago
Nah Rust evangelism is pretty organic. I remember it having a cult 6 years ago too, before any of these companies got involved.
22.
by zelly 5y ago
C++ is pretty much the opposite of moving fast and breaking things. It takes like 10+ years, lots of academic papers and debates, lots of peer review, to get a feature into the ISO standard. The reason it's so bloated is just because o
23.
by zelly 5y ago
Solana has done more for Rust adoption than either Amazon or Mozilla
24.
by zelly 5y ago
Nah, they are by far the most honest. I would rather trust shitmex than the CME.
25.
by zelly 5y ago
No one cares about the "owner" of the corporation, what matters is the registered agent. There are law firms to handle all this for you.
26.
by zelly 5y ago
excellent post, sir, but shhhhh
27.
by zelly 5y ago
> I don't have millions of dollars in my pocket You need to work on your alpha then, that should be your priority
28.
by zelly 5y ago
Trying to do that is a massive waste of time. It's legitimately easier to maintain separate codebases for each of the different platforms. The code that doesn't need to change can be a library. Or you use some super high level abs
29.
by zelly 5y ago
Bazel does the opposite of rebuild-the-world. That's more of a CMake thing (rm -rf build && mkdir build && cd build && cmake ..). Bazel won't even run tests if the code the tests depend on have not changed.
30.
by zelly 5y ago
CMake is legitimately the worst software I've ever used. cargo > Bazel > autotools > "the IDE" > handwritten Makefiles >>>>>> build.sh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

More ›