zb3

8 ms·

1.
by zb3 8d ago
No, this is the religion here
2.
by zb3 11d ago
My view is that current "emission reduction" just moves jobs to China and India, which decreases overall labor rights and negatively affects the working class.. Still, if you want to have your new iPhone 18/19/20 pro ult
3.
by zb3 15d ago
Good to know they're getting desperate, the sooner they implode the better
4.
by zb3 15d ago
So bullshit safeguards are still there.
5.
by zb3 21d ago
We also have modelscope.cn, I'm sure that one won't get acquired
6.
by zb3 24d ago
Not just security researchers, these safeguards can flag ordinary reverse engineering or even debugging tasks, this is pure comedy..
7.
by zb3 24d ago
Amazon should be criminally liable for this attempted destruction of property.
8.
by zb3 24d ago
I'd not consider it malware if its sole purpose is to do ad/click fraud. The user is not the target here, the user's enemies are :)
9.
by zb3 26d ago
The question is whether the new gen Snapdragon Elite SoCs will finally support non-protected KVM? That would make native "linux terminal" (which has GUI support) work.. so far Qualcomm is the only flagship vendor that doesn't
10.
by zb3 26d ago
Screw you Anthropic and screw your gatekeeping, Opus 5 refuses even basic reverse engineering / patching tasks, even BPF is apparently too dangerous, you lost your minds..
11.
by zb3 27d ago
As someone who used AI to build tools that help me with reverse engineering, I'm not particularly concerned about that political discourse - I could even use a model from the DPRK that constantly praises Kim Jong Un, as long as it woul
12.
by zb3 27d ago
We can know if this is Anthropic/OpenAI by testing the "guardrails" - absurd guardrails = it's them, reasonable/no guardrails = Chinese models.. (as a bonus - thinking forever = GLM)
13.
by zb3 28d ago
Pixel kernel drivers which are GPLv2, you need them to build the kernel modules from source. Git tags in this case refer to beta versions, but it being "beta" doesn't mean they can delay the release.
14.
by zb3 29d ago
Too low blood pressure? Not anymore, thanks Apple.
15.
by zb3 1mo ago
Device support is poor, no official GSI versions (with hacks, but still..) are available. Of course money has to be involved.. try asking them whether device X will be supported or try reporting a bug. First you'll be verbally abused b
16.
by zb3 1mo ago
Murena could, Jolla could, GrapheneOS could do that too (possibly Nexphone also did but we'll find out; only GrapheneOS will give us flagship experience though). Of course these (except Jolla?) are still based on the Android model, but
17.
by zb3 1mo ago
You're not being negative enough when it comes to non-Android linux phones, and even when it comes to Android, there's just ONE serious project - GrapheneOS which has people working full-time and which will be officially supported
18.
by zb3 1mo ago
PostmarketOS can't partner with any OEM/ODM and volunteers have to use hacks to unofficially implement basic Android 1.0 functionality years after a device was released? That's sad to see. This is just lame, drivers should be
19.
by zb3 1mo ago
Wait till they block adb access like that for "security" reasons.. The situation is hopeless here, market forces didn't work, the only solution is regulation, but the CCP apparently doesn't care about corporations holdin
20.
by zb3 1mo ago
Google has started publishing "binary transparency", this would help detect unusual software updates, while other methods (including AI) would help detect normal backdoors. Basically in the AI age, the difference between a vulnera
21.
by zb3 1mo ago
Besides AdGuard I also have my own extension that loads userscripts from my own server (that uses the new userScripts API), so I think I only see my own point of view and the things that would potentially limit my solutions. So far I'm
22.
by zb3 1mo ago
I use MV3 AdGuard and it blocks ads for me. I don't get the fuss about MV2 deprecation.. sure, MV3 is limited compared to firefox, but it's not like MV2 was that much better, no version ever supported rewriting request response. M
23.
by zb3 1mo ago
Steps we're actually taking: - sharing the model with DoD, NSA and Israeli government
24.
by zb3 1mo ago
I didn't say that about AI, AI will likely get more expensive and it has already worsened affordability of consumer electronics in general.. However, in this particular case, AI has certainly helped us get much more tools, including th
25.
by zb3 1mo ago
Meanwhile AI has created 10x as many corners, some even open source and without the expectation of being for-profit.
26.
by zb3 1mo ago
If the manufacturer could add this setting via a software update, but I couldn't - by design - then I stand by my definition that I don't own it, because it's not my interest that gets prioritized there. However, it's po
27.
by zb3 1mo ago
The number of choices exposed to users is irrelevant, what's relevant is that choices which I'd want exposed are not exposed, and without root, there's no extension mechanism which'd let me load my code into for example
28.
by zb3 1mo ago
If the toaster acts against my interest and I can't change its behaviour then yes, absolutely. It doesn't have to be named root, the point is that my device should act in my interest to the fullest extent permitted by the law. But
29.
by zb3 1mo ago
> Vendors aren't doing the hard work for anything but Android. Because of Google's cartel-like structure where OEMs get more profit by joining, Google shares some revenue from screwing the user. > postmarketOS and other proj
30.
by zb3 1mo ago
Because this will be less profitable. Google created a cartel-like model where if you make a device that doesn't respect user choice, you will make more money because Google will share with you, providing you obey their rules. This mod

More ›