witheredspirit

8 ms·

1.
by witheredspirit 4mo ago
Stop blaming the users when it's literally the company that's violating the contract/agreement (and potentially violating the law). Superiority complex about your proposed solution is ridiculous because Google can and will cl
2.
by witheredspirit 9mo ago
Custom elements have their purpose, but in most cases you don't need them and existing elements suffice. With how this article was written (the use of "then" when they meant "than", mentioning "article-heading&
3.
by witheredspirit 10mo ago
>just to disagree Ad hominem. I did not create it to disagree with you specifically, your stance is not that unique, as you can see I've replied to similar positions. However, when you admit the quiet part out loud I feel like you h
4.
by witheredspirit 10mo ago
Have you verified your numbers? With some basic searching I found that the amount of cars registered in the EU seems to be comparable (if not slightly more than) than the USA, while the total length of public roads in the USA is about 10% m
5.
by witheredspirit 10mo ago
So, your argument is that the US wants money no matter if it kills people with cars due to lower safety standards, nor if it gives up on allies and security guarantees the US promised? That just sounds like their greed is what's causin
6.
by witheredspirit 10mo ago
The 5% GDP deadline is 2035. The 2% by 2024 was met. Not even the US spends 5% of their GDP on defense. Again as I've stated, it's been criticized as a bad goal to use this metric. In actuality, people who push the narrative that
7.
by witheredspirit 10mo ago
This is a bogus statement. EU countries have met or surpassed defense budget goals, usually the ones that don't have the contracts in progress but the full payouts not done yet since they are still in progress. Percentage of GDP to mil