7 ms·
>just to disagree Ad hominem. I did not create it to disagree with you specifically, your stance is not that unique, as you can see I've replied to similar pos
by witheredspirit 10mo ago
>just to disagree
Ad hominem.
I did not create it to disagree with you specifically, your stance is not that unique, as you can see I've replied to similar positions. However, when you admit the quiet part out loud I feel like you have no rebuttal and are fine with the exploitation in favor of money standpoint, which should bring your other standpoints in question if this is your guiding principle.
- ExoticPearTree 10mo agoI disagree in your assertion that sarcasm is an “ad hominem” attack.