vips7L

8 ms·

1.
by vips7L 4d ago
So if Y happened (they stole it), why should we be happy about that? Why should we give them credit in the situation where they stole it? Why is that good for society?
2.
by vips7L 4d ago
It was inconsiderate and it was also stolen, just like everything else OpenAI has stolen to train their models.
3.
by vips7L 4d ago
You literally said they _stole_ the work. Why should we give credit to that?
4.
by vips7L 4d ago
It's immoral to steal someone's research. Quite sad that you don't believe that.
5.
by vips7L 5d ago
Whether you use async or blocking calls you’ll still want to keep IO at your edges otherwise you end up with tightly coupled spaghetti.
6.
by vips7L 5d ago
We should be happy that they’re stealing people’s work?
7.
by vips7L 5d ago
Why what benefit has it brought? Mass anxiety?
8.
by vips7L 7d ago
Just like using LLMs. Completely optional.
9.
A 40-year-old kernel bug discovered on the DEFCON 34 main stage(yuvalino.com)
5 points by vips7L 8d ago|1 comments
10.
by vips7L 10d ago
Pure marketing slop.
11.
by vips7L 13d ago
Dead tech
12.
by vips7L 14d ago
I’ll say it since no one else is: you don’t have to use LLMs. I still write everything by hand and I’m still shipping as fast as my coworkers.
13.
by vips7L 14d ago
Other engineering specialties are typically protected under law in many states as well.
14.
by vips7L 14d ago
I love this guy. I don't want to use this stuff either. It produces a subpar product and way lower quality than I would ever output.
15.
by vips7L 16d ago
I highly disagree. Code is still meant to be and still is read more by humans.
16.
by vips7L 16d ago
> That's because it's cheaper to automate than pay a software engineer For now. It also seems like we're still paying software engineers.
17.
by vips7L 16d ago
> Good writing requires thinking, reflection, and doing multiple passes Same with code, but that doesn't seem to matter anymore.
18.
by vips7L 16d ago
Never used it in any of the projects I’ve been on.
19.
by vips7L 16d ago
IMO it’s because LLM text doesn’t really say anything. It’s 600% more text and paragraphs for things that could be said in 1 sentence.
20.
by vips7L 17d ago
I’d have to stop interacting with meat proxies and wouldn’t have to read copy pasted LLM text.
21.
by vips7L 19d ago
Big fan of Keycloak personally, but I'm also deep in the Quarkus/JVM ecosystem and Quarkus makes deving against Keycloak extremely easy.
22.
by vips7L 20d ago
> just hook into the Auth library you use (library, not service). I think this is a fundamental misunderstanding of how this stuff works. You can't "just use a library". Your identity server is a service, open source or no
23.
by vips7L 20d ago
I really whole heartedly disagree and if you think it’s silly I think that you don’t really fully understand the complexity of it. An LLM doesn’t solve everything. You still need to understand the spec, become a domain expert, and design yo
24.
by vips7L 20d ago
This is a terrible suggestion. Rolling your own auth nowadays is like rolling your own encryption. It’s just a bad idea. OAuth and OIDC are massive specs that are constantly changing and you’re going to be stuck chasing and developing auth
25.
by vips7L 21d ago
“Usefulness”
26.
by vips7L 25d ago
Generated Sloppies bro
27.
by vips7L 27d ago
Does it? The only think I can think of not being in the standard library is a json parser
28.
by vips7L 27d ago
Can’t get left behind by people who can’t write a crud endpoint or an email by themselves.
29.
by vips7L 27d ago
Yes they will.
30.
by vips7L 27d ago
Isn’t that because select wasn’t style-able?

More ›