vhantz

7 ms·

1.
by vhantz 18d ago
> study > anthropic.com link Sure
2.
by vhantz 29d ago
> live * spiking* simulation
3.
by vhantz 29d ago
I wonder how long will the "curl my arbitrary script and pipe it to bash" will continue being a delivery method.
4.
by vhantz 1mo ago
> It's also "out-brute forcing them." It just never gets tired. If a mathematician picks a research direction and spends a whole week on it and it doesn't pan out, they will likely be annoyed, need a break for a while
5.
by vhantz 1mo ago
Evidently some already stopped thinking way before the advent of these mythical thinking machines
6.
by vhantz 1mo ago
Whenever someone tell me they can be reduced to an LLM, I believe them. I see you and I believe you that you are qualitatively the same as a language model.
7.
by vhantz 1mo ago
First, I'm SURE there are ways to send scripts from one computer to another over the internet. Second, the point isn't about a specific repo, it's the general tendency to rely on fuzzy .md files scattered all over the place.
8.
by vhantz 1mo ago
It's a language model. It generates text.
9.
by vhantz 1mo ago
There is such a clear lack of innovation drive in this field. Every lab just copies what the other does. One of the most baffling things to me is how the once-upon-a-time good developer instinct to make everything reusable, testable, and de
10.
by vhantz 1mo ago
Unbelievable take considering announcements about US labs routinely top this website
11.
by vhantz 1mo ago
Stop wasting your time and use actual code for most of what you give an LLM to do. Make them write the code even. Anything that can be verified mechanically should be code. Only use LLMs to fill in the gaps where things are fuzzy. Don'
12.
by vhantz 1mo ago
> For some AIME problems Opus 4.8 sometimes states the answer before deriving it. We find that the API summary does not always preserve this distinction, and can instead make the reasoning appear like a clean derivation. No surprise here
13.
by vhantz 1mo ago
Has to be a bot...
14.
by vhantz 1mo ago
An anecdote is an anecdote is an anecdote
15.
by vhantz 2mo ago
There is no good imperialist power, there is no capitalism with a human face, there will never be. The UK murdered millions in India, Ireland and all around the world in their time. The US did the same. The only reason China isn't open
16.
by vhantz 2mo ago
The american state routinely shoots and kills its own citizens in broad daylight with 0 repercussions. Thinking it answers to its citizens is severely deluded.
17.
by vhantz 2mo ago
Schrödinger's China at once is an evil entity looking to use AI for their own nefarious purposes yet also willing to cooperate with their main competitor to prevent other actors (who??) from achieving similar goals (all while under a c
18.
by vhantz 3mo ago
Good thing we've overcome that! Today, in the land of the free, researchers' passion is rewarded with good salaries and working conditions. Right?
19.
by vhantz 3mo ago
From cells dividing to human generation there is a single step. Similarly a program that runs on a computer, where its only interactions are strings of numbers is the same as an entity having to interact with the world.
20.
by vhantz 3mo ago
We must then assume you're not getting those 10x gains
21.
by vhantz 3mo ago
[Email] Hello, We're writing to inform you about some updates to our Privacy Policy. These changes only affect consumer accounts (Claude Free, Pro, and Max plans). If you use Claude Team, Claude Enterprise, the Claude Platform, or othe
22.
New Anthropic privacy policy: age/identity verification for consumer accounts(anthropic.com)
6 points by vhantz 3mo ago|3 comments
23.
by vhantz 3mo ago
> If Claude gives me poor or incorrect advice while I’m working on an AI component, I have no way of knowing whether the model was confused, whether my problem is unsolvable, or if some invisible policy restriction quietly kicked in. Yea
24.
by vhantz 4mo ago
I agree with you that this is not primarily a logistics but really a social problem. I think the section on the Soviet Union in the article addresses specifically that point. > The proponents of the economic calculation problem now tell
25.
by vhantz 4mo ago
> There are, of course, still economists who think that the socialist calculation debate is not over. Yet I think it is quite clear that planning is all around us under capitalism. The planned economy works in theory, but more importantl
26.
The need for a socialist planned economy (2021)(marxist.ca)
24 points by vhantz 4mo ago|9 comments
27.
by vhantz 4mo ago
Huge corporations like Walmart and Amazon are actually proof that central planning works. And that not planning internally is not viable, as Sears demonstrated. But this internal planning is not enough and comes up against the limits of cap
28.
by vhantz 4mo ago
What's the difference between a "hallucinated" citation and consciously inserting reference to a non-existent paper and hopping it goes unnoticed? How do we determine which one was done consciously and which was "a minor
29.
by vhantz 4mo ago
I read elsewhere that WebRTC will drop audio, have you had any issues with that? And generally, you don't need any buffering mechanisms for the clients? Nice project!
30.
by vhantz 4mo ago
> A shipped app, in a language nobody on the team knew Great! Let's look back on this not too far in the future.

More ›