undecisive

13 ms·

1.
by undecisive 2mo ago
We're in the worst of all worlds. Sometimes it feels like you only know it's a human because the AI would have over-explained. But yeah, this security company only prodded, what, once or twice a month for 7 months? I mean, if they
2.
by undecisive 3mo ago
They have "clarified" elsewhere on here that the normal citizenry get a legal exemption [waves hands mystically] somehow, and that they're only blocking people when they legally have to. Obviously (to the rest of us) if the
3.
by undecisive 5mo ago
As with anything word-gamey involving internet, you will probably have to trim down your dictionary. While I'm very glad my "sxxg" beat their "txxt", the first probably shouldn't be allowed (although there are
4.
by undecisive 5mo ago
Analogies are not the problem. In fact, an analogy is like a good knife; sharp, removes problematic parts, and totally unethical unless it knows the motivations of its wielder. Seriously though, yes it is obvious why analogies are so often
5.
by undecisive 5mo ago
I think that's where most people thought that this article was going. Shall we just have that debate anyway? :D The big question that I hoped the article might address: Can AI ever be ethical (within the norms of what the average Jo(e)
6.
by undecisive 5mo ago
This article in a nutshell: AI will never be ethical or safe, because no tool can ever be ethical or safe, without it knowing the complete motivation of any person using it and every person who might receive its outputs. Wasn't the art
7.
by undecisive 8mo ago
It's interesting; I'd imagine very similar design briefs (friendliness, breadliness, etc) The ICBINB font is almost a semi-serif, almost like a sans serif that's slightly melted, whereas I'd say the crumpet is fully seri
8.
by undecisive 11mo ago
No, I agree. That said, I think a lot of that particular shift is down to a) increased individualism b) an emphasis on the healing power of personal boundaries and c) the rejection of unity as an overriding good. People are far more happy t
9.
by undecisive 11mo ago
Yeah, certainly tickles a few neurons. I feel like BDFLs are akin to the concept of village elders; they're not immune to corruption or scandal, but they often have this beloved status that can paper over a lot of cracks. That's p
10.
by undecisive 2y ago
> 1) explained why relying on Docker Hub is dangerous I mean, that's the other 770 words of the article. Except they're just giving their experience, and allowing you to come to your own decisions - because otherwise people mig
11.
by undecisive 2y ago
I love how you intentionally cropped off the first two words of that sentence, try to make out that their 30 word side note was actually the whole point of the 800 word article, and you STILL didn't manage to make them sound as malicio
12.
by undecisive 2y ago
Here's a tiny bit of missing context. This blog is for LinuxServer.io, who build repositories that produce free docker images, for free, paid for by donations, for a bunch of open source software. By the looks of things, they are liter
13.
by undecisive 2y ago
I just tried it with phi3.5:3.8b-mini-instruct-fp16 - it didn't work with the base question, though interestingly the reasoning decided that strawberry was spelt s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r - which explains why the AIs have such a hard time with t
14.
by undecisive 2y ago
Yeah, it was paper cuts - for example, if you don't have git installed inside your devbox, it wouldn't work because of different glibc versions. Which would be fine, but my shell prompt uses git. So there has to be a nix version o
15.
by undecisive 2y ago
My experience of Devbox on Linux has been highly disappointing. I gave it a good go, had it running on my main project from February to May. In case you hadn't realised, the very concept of having two sets of binary distributions on on
16.
by undecisive 2y ago
Yeah, somehow I completely misread that sentence.
17.
by undecisive 2y ago
Cunningham's law baiting - I love it! So yeah, turns out it's nothing to do with the 8266's board, and everything to do with the chosen relay module. Since it has nothing to do with driving the relay, it doesn't need to
18.
by undecisive 2y ago
Ahh! So it's not the ESP that has an extra connection, it's the relay breakout board. That makes much more sense. Yeah, I guess you would need to sound the doorbell every boot, and that might be inconvenient in places with a lot o
19.
by undecisive 2y ago
Am I missing something? Neither schematics nor my limited understanding of physics explains why you need to, nor how it is possible to, bend one of the pins to disconnect GPIO0 (chip-row, 3rd from the left) from the reset pin (edge-row, 2nd
20.
by undecisive 2y ago
As is often the case, the truth is far more complicated. Firstly, the bridge - while up to code - did not have the kinds of buffers that could have been installed, or arguably should have been installed [1] It isn't wrong to say that i
21.
by undecisive 3y ago
TIL - I have never used make without a Makefile! Thank you!
22.
by undecisive 3y ago
To compile it you'll need to tell it to link to libcurl, e.g. with -lcurl on gcc: curl https://ifconfig.me --libcurl ip_fetcher.c # Output: your ip address, and a file ip_fetcher.c gcc -o ip_fetcher ip_fetcher
23.
by undecisive 3y ago
Colonialist: To my mind, it was the 's' on the phrase "primitive peoples". In other words, it is implying that people in our "civilized" society suffer from this, but those more primitive peoples outside of our
24.
by undecisive 3y ago
> In the case of a woman who has a fully developed muscular system and has had ample physical exertion all through the pregnancy, as is common with all more primitive peoples, nature provides all the necessary equipment and power to hav
25.
by undecisive 3y ago
Sure. So I discussed this situation generically, because the specific situation doesn't really matter given the question asked. And no, I said it was impolite - but I totally understand that impolite is a big step up from toxic. The bi
26.
by undecisive 3y ago
IANAL, but I think it comes down to your interpretation of section 4: > You may convey verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you > receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and > appropriately publis
27.
by undecisive 3y ago
Yeah, it's awkwardly worded. I must have read the same sentence 3 times before I realised what it was saying. Looking at the latest version of the TOS, the new company is operating under the name "ManyCam ULC"
28.
by undecisive 3y ago
No, Visicom is the old owner, as per the quote in the original post: “ManyCam is now under new ownership. […] Visicom Media stands by the Lifetime customers and will continue to support them by arranging with the new owner for a total of tw
29.
by undecisive 3y ago
Yeah. Lots of red flags in that EULA, including bits that don't seem to make any sense: "You agree any legal dispute involving ManyCam services and software must take place in the state or federal courts in Montreal, Quebec."
30.
by undecisive 3y ago
Poor Tim. (There's a very British joke for you.) The post tries to recognise that it's not as easy as this: > you try to help them level up: pay for classes, conferences, and/or books; connect them with mentors or coaches;

More ›