uh_uh

5 ms·

1.
by uh_uh 5d ago
But you can't just plug those into your already existing stack easily, unlike a purely API-based solution no?
2.
by uh_uh 6d ago
I tried and it's difficult to create a good agent harness.
3.
by uh_uh 1mo ago
There are trade-offs here: Give up too early -> users will get annoyed because the task would have been solvable if the model pushed harder. Give up too late -> collateral damage while completing the task A.K.A. misalignment.
4.
by uh_uh 2mo ago
It just feels silly to haggle about the price here. It doesn't even matter because it's going to drop by an OOM quickly. If these 10 problems were solved by humans, it would be pretty impressive, even if it took a large number of
5.
by uh_uh 2mo ago
It is comical at this point. Some people just can not stand the thought of AI actually delivering and are trying to find whatever ways to discredit it.
6.
by uh_uh 3mo ago
These dewormers treat the condition after the individual was already infected. I don't think they prevent the disease. Additionally, taking Albendazole without anti-inflammatory meds can be fatal in case of an active infection. Reason
7.
by uh_uh 3mo ago
AFAIK there is no prophylactic for pork tapeworms. I'd love to be proven wrong.
8.
by uh_uh 4mo ago
What kind of apps are you writing where GC spikes matter?
9.
by uh_uh 7mo ago
I wasn't trying to link the two. Just pointed out that there seems to be a lot of unknowns on the map.
10.
by uh_uh 7mo ago
> It's what having such senses feels like from the inside; the first-person view. The hard problem is that there is such a feeling at all.
11.
by uh_uh 7mo ago
Isn't there a magical moment needed still when a single qubit "touches" the rest of the universe?
12.
by uh_uh 7mo ago
I'd say we are confused about both the lowest (quantum) and highest level (consciousness) phenomena of the known Universe. Quite humbling.
13.
by uh_uh 7mo ago
Would you be similarly pedantic if a high-schooler did the same?
14.
by uh_uh 7mo ago
OK, but don't you see where this is going? The trajectory that we're on?
15.
by uh_uh 7mo ago
How so?
16.
by uh_uh 7mo ago
> Because remember, Apple doesn't usually invent new products. It takes proven ones and then makes its own much nicer version. Funny seeing this repeated again in response to Siri which is just... not very good.
17.
by uh_uh 8mo ago
The other day I heard ChatGBD.
18.
by uh_uh 8mo ago
There will always be a way out if you are dedicated enough. They "just" want to make it unviable for most of the population.
19.
by uh_uh 8mo ago
Couple years ago you could have made the same argument about talking computers and here we are.
20.
by uh_uh 8mo ago
If you own AGI, human workers are worse than zero. They become an active threat that can kill you.
21.
by uh_uh 9mo ago
I don't think this is true at all. There are multiple sources talking about how the mutation rate is context-dependent.
22.
by uh_uh 9mo ago
I think you are psychoanalyzing me a little bit too much. Am I allowed to say that I'm an atheist and I don't believe in intelligent design, or are you going to explain to me that I'm confused about my own beliefs?
23.
by uh_uh 9mo ago
I have little patience for intelligent-design and the likes, if that's what you are getting at. All I'm saying is that blind enumeration of mutations seems combinatorially infeasible due to the vastness of the search space. It is
24.
by uh_uh 9mo ago
> It's not just planet-scale, it's universe-scale. Lots of planets conduct the experiment, ours just happens to have resulted in intelligence. My argument doesn't depend on the existence of an intelligent species on the pl
25.
by uh_uh 9mo ago
Let's take human DNA as an example. It contains 3.2B GTCA base pairs. This gives rise to 4^3.2B possible combos. It's just not possible to navigate this space blindly. There is not enough atoms in the universe to do that. It is kn
26.
by uh_uh 9mo ago
I find it hard to believe that evolution is completely blind. The search space that it can explore via mutations is astronomically large. Considering that the experiment is run at planet-scale over billions of years doesn't really save
27.
by uh_uh 9mo ago
"Hidden" or "latent" in a context like this just means variables that the algo is trying to infer because it doesn't have direct access to them.
28.
by uh_uh 11mo ago
Exactly, these agentic coding tools which operate on your codebase present on your own disk are a lot more fungible than most SaaS.
29.
by uh_uh 11mo ago
You don't have to prove it to me that Trump is a lot more self-serving than Biden. This should be obvious to anyone with half a brain. That said, this shouldn't be a competition of who is "more self-serving". Just becaus
30.
by uh_uh 11mo ago
I will help: people don't like it when the presidential pardon is used for self-serving shit.

More ›