6 ms·

How so?

• Philpax 7mo ago
  They're on shaky ground right now https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/02/five-months-later-nvidias-100-billion-openai-investment-plan-has-fizzled-out/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/02/five-...
• kingstnap 7mo ago
  Its kind of a suck up that more or less confirms the beef stories that were floating around this past week. In case you missed it. For example: Nvidia's $100 billion OpenAI deal has seemingly vanished - Ars Technica https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/02/five-months-later-nvidias-100-billion-openai-investment-plan-has-fizzled-out/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/02/five-... Specifically this paragraph is what I find hilarious. > According to the report, the issue became apparent in OpenAI’s Codex, an AI code-generation tool. OpenAI staff reportedly attributed some of Codex’s performance limitations to Nvidia’s GPU-based hardware.
  • esafak 7mo ago
    > OpenAI staff reportedly attributed some of Codex’s performance limitations to Nvidia’s GPU-based hardware. They should design their own hardware, then. Somehow the other companies seem to be able to produce fast-enough models.
    • sumedh 7mo ago
      > They should design their own hardware They made a deal with Cerebras for fast inference.
  • dajonker 7mo ago
    There was never a $100 billion deal. Only a letter of intent which doesn't mean anything contractually.