torwayburger

8 ms·

1.
by torwayburger 5y ago
> Most of the value proposition of the Unifi lineup is I can look at a single website ... > The single pane of glass to view everything when I am many miles from the networks I support is essential It's also why we're talkin
2.
by torwayburger 5y ago
I took a CCNA 200-301 class on udemy to learn all that stuff.
3.
by torwayburger 5y ago
I didn't even think of it when I wrote the original reply, but if the locations share power grid wires internally you can always g.hn over that copper to get the connection through the wall.
4.
by torwayburger 5y ago
I don't doubt for one second that you're right about this being prevalent as well. Tom Selleck sure tries his best to talk more boomers into this line of thinking.
5.
by torwayburger 5y ago
No sorry it does need line of sight :/
6.
by torwayburger 5y ago
Mikrotik wireless wire? Sub $200 wireless link. It's a pair, not an ap. Anyway - it does what it says on the tin.
7.
by torwayburger 5y ago
Haha teaching others how to behave online .... Oh my.
8.
by torwayburger 5y ago
This. The amount of gaudy 2 story mansions that's standing vacant while delapitated and for sale. Most of them end up as rentals as they don't sell, and deteriorate even more in value as they're not cared for. Add this to the
9.
by torwayburger 6y ago
No. My point was that 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) are not the same thing. The important point to note in this case is: "501(c)(4) organizations may engage in unlimited lobbying in furtherance of their social welfare purposes." "
10.
by torwayburger 6y ago
Right, not the same as 501(c)(3), was my point exactly.
11.
by torwayburger 6y ago
My understanding is that they're registered as a charitable organization , not a non-profit. These terms are often used interchangeably, but from a tax and earnings perspective they mean different things. This is often further confuse
12.
by torwayburger 6y ago
I replied to (a comment) and tried to contrast how a state owned power grid can still have profit models attached and function both technically and for it's intended customers.
13.
by torwayburger 6y ago
You're interpretation of it isn't wrong. You're still wrong in asserting that it wasn't presentes as a fact in the article. It clearly, linguistically is.
14.
by torwayburger 6y ago
Beervirus is stealing my time by arguing nonsense. See? Clearly presented as fact by the language used and yet clearly it's nonsense. No label necessary.
15.
by torwayburger 6y ago
Statnett, a state owned entity operated by the energy ministry, runs the Norwegian grid.
16.
by torwayburger 6y ago
I grew up in Norway. As a grid customer I could shop around for the best power company that fit my situation (e.g. solar? Apartment?). Norway is covered in snow 8-9 months of the year. I think what you're describing is a problem with m
17.
by torwayburger 6y ago
I honestly think the article skims this point in an effort to focus on the bare necessary information to communicate this to relatively non-technical people.
18.
by torwayburger 6y ago
I haven't done any research on this particular system/device myself. I skimmed this article and just finished the Twitter thread about the other product designed to count people. Beyond the boogeymen watching the feed threat, this
19.
by torwayburger 6y ago
You denote the end of the era. I assume you understand why it ended.
20.
by torwayburger 6y ago
It's written as a statement, not as a figure of speech. If it's not intended to be factual, it should be annotated as such. It literally claims theft as it stands, which makes the article seem juvenile in use of language.
21.
by torwayburger 6y ago
Being a figure of speech has little to do with the statement being factually incorrect.
22.
by torwayburger 6y ago
"..., stealing users from WhatsApp ..." Genuinely curious about this statement. Is it tantamount to theft if the user migrates by choice?
23.
by torwayburger 6y ago
I'm thinking McCarthyism as an example makes it good advice either way.
24.
by torwayburger 6y ago
Inversely, they took a position exploiting pretty much exactly what you describe from a hedge fund, and the only reason it didn't work was that it got shut down by powers from above.
25.
by torwayburger 6y ago
I think so. Some examples of places where this has impact but is often overlooked could be when you change car brand. Or if you go from one phone OS to another. The UX features will be slightly different, and there will be a learning curve.
26.
by torwayburger 6y ago
I could be wrong but this sounds more like NAT port issue given the frequency and static lease agreement on IP.
27.
by torwayburger 6y ago
They arrested a bunch of people in Michigan over a plot on the governor, no? We moved out of the theory a while ago.
28.
by torwayburger 6y ago
Logs are not transferred to new devices either. Presumably disappearing messages are not left in the encrypted db file(?).
29.
by torwayburger 6y ago
Actually, no. Retributive justice is not something LE usually gets involved in (within civilized democracies). It is left for the courts. The way she was arrested isn't normal, nor necessary. But I suspect that was the point.
30.
by torwayburger 6y ago
Even if you believe retributive justice is to be doled out by LE, one of its own principles is: "It is morally impermissible intentionally to punish the innocent or to inflict disproportionately large punishments on wrongdoers." A

More ›