throwawaylinux

7 ms·

1.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Would you trust Google for anything political?
2.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
You mean that's not what you previously misrepresented my position to be.
3.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> I don't think this is relevant or a good counter argument, I think it is. It's a pretty weak "argument" to begin with, more like just an assertion that it's wrong (because it's wrong). > we could easily
4.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> No but they should have access to basic things such as to be able to experience the natural world. It would be pretty fucking depressing if you were born into a shitty spaceship and told your job is to pro-create so the next generation
5.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Nobody born has signed up for anything.
6.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
That people don't have to be miserable with greed and envy of people who have more than they do? It's a very common and socially acceptable opinion actually.
7.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
It will be great to see the collapse of the EU as well, which seems to be further along than USA.
8.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
I'd love to help but I'm not sure what words you're struggling with. "Could", perhaps? Or is it just the hypothetical nature of the question and answer that is not talking about a specific person's complete lif
9.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
You know it's time to take a break from the internet when you get so upset that you start with the keyboard tough guy shtick. Hope you feel better soon.
10.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
And if that's all that's preventing it then it is an actual matchup.
11.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
It does not. I obviously did not say or imply that everybody can be happy with what they have. People who have more than you existing doesn't have to be a reason that you're unhappy though.
12.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
I'd imagine America would be the last place China would invade, so I would be surprised if they'd bother. The closest (western) scenario I could see them training for is Australia.
13.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> If that’s fed into the neural net, I don’t this is an actual matchup. I think it is an actual matchup. Is there a prohibition against the human pilot from riding in the aircraft to improve latency?
14.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Apple invested in them for a chip for Newton, not for the ARM architecture in particular. Apple was creating their own PowerPC architcture around this time, and they sold their share of ARM when they gave up on Newton. The PA Semi purchase
15.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> Apple has been investing directly in mobile processors since they bought a stake in ARM for the Newton. Then later they heavily invested in PortalPlayer, the designer of the iPod SoCs. Not this heavily. They bought an entire CPU design
16.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
So Japan's dumping of radioactive waste into the ocean might just be one of the greatest things ever done for marine life. This could be the first time in history that the "green" / petroleum alliance's anti-nuclear
17.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> I agree with much of what you say, but I think you overestimate the effect reducing population would have on the environment. I don't think I estimated it anywhere, so I don't think I am. And in fact I was not just talking ab
18.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
No to the notion that it was a "non-comparative example" of hunter-gatherers killing for pure survival.
19.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
I'm not quite sure what MAGA and similar is, or really concerned about the power or influence the lunatic fringe might weild. High level "experts" and "officials" from neoliberal economic and political institutions
20.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
I thought I did the opposite of ignore it, which was to address it directly. I acknowledged it was a difficult thing to deal with but that almost all countries will have to soon anyway, and I also also rejected the assertion that it is the
21.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Ah, good point. In that case expand the niche cases to traveling due north or south.
22.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
I'm not "romanticizing" anything. I think you are just repeating talking points that have never really been challenged and made to stand up to scrutiny. > They have a massively ageing population, which is the true problem.
23.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
I'm not a sea dog (or air dog), but even absent electronic calculation and navigation devices of the last half century or so, is there any real advantage to using nm vs any other unit? Other than for the presumably niche case of travel
24.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
I find it wonderful that they are learning to live with a nice successful society that is not in a state of constant exponential growth, and they've resisted doomers and deranged neoliberal calls to keep massively expanding population.
25.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
No, a lot of animals kill for fun (not just "pure survival"), including early humans, some apes, and quite probably our common ancestors.
26.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
And neither does the evolutionary drive to kill animals consider those things.
27.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Our ancestors who evolved to hunt did not "play fair", they killed animals any way they possibly could. Running them off cliffs, into pits, setting fire to the forest to burn them alive. Might as well say guns and knives aren&#x27
28.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
30mph across the entire fleet, 24x7? I don't live in a city with them but that sounds optimistic. 30mph seems like a decent average in a big city when you're on the move. Add stops to recharge, pick and drop fares, maintenance, an
29.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
It's a local exploit, which are not uncommon in Linux.
30.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
No.

More ›