tflol

6 ms·

1.
by tflol 10mo ago
> My kids go to a ordinary public school. They are very bright, cautious, and thoughtful, and generally pretty happy and upbeat. There is a strong correlation between academic intelligence and mental illness. Being depressed to the point
2.
by tflol 10mo ago
> This is horrifying. I agree with this. I've learned a lot through life, one thing I've learned is about detrimental long term physical and even social effects of antidepressants, and other medications like adderal. Both I use
3.
by tflol 2y ago
Or "we know this isn't practical but we need to get this shit on our resumes while it's still relevant"
4.
by tflol 2y ago
You're taking about this company: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/purview-compliance https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/communication-comp...
5.
by tflol 2y ago
Not a risk I'm personally willing to take ;)
6.
by tflol 2y ago
In my case, wandering male Sydney Funnel-web Spiders make me want to avoid Australia
7.
by tflol 2y ago
It'd be interesting to stress test that thing with a Solfeggietto or some equivalent.
8.
by tflol 2y ago
a take I have on 1984, outside of the infamy, is that it's an epic romantic novel. Winston and Julia vs. the world.
9.
by tflol 2y ago
Off topic but I just randomly, on one of the rare occasions I do, skateboarded with a friend and was immediately hit with a skateboarding ad while reading this article afterwards. And I certainly appreciate the irony of this happening while
10.
by tflol 2y ago
I've seen this enforced by the number of persons in your party (say, 6 minimum). If you come in with a ton of people at an establishment that expects tips, make a ton of noise, traumatize the front staff, completely destroy the place,
11.
by tflol 2y ago
SPI firewall looks interesting, appreciate the education.
12.
by tflol 2y ago
You're saying there's less incentive for widespread automated attacks on personal devices? edit: Changing the subject to insulting me is a bad way to conclude. You're creating an illusion the debate is concluded in your favor
13.
by tflol 2y ago
> now they're just hosing your consumer router There is a dramatic difference in effort between ( owning a device ) and ( owning a router, configuring network access to the device, then owning the device ). Also psychologically: If
14.
by tflol 2y ago
This looks like the usual ipv6 kool aid batshit. I don't want a bunch of kids and enemy states poking at and port scanning my laptop directly, regardless of whether or not I have a firewall enabled. And, no, I don't think it'
15.
Apparent social media audience-targeted comment manipulation(old.reddit.com)
2 points by tflol 2y ago|0 comments
16.
by tflol 2y ago
You could almost argue these results are directly human generated. edit: And in that case, who is the arbiter of truth?
17.
by tflol 2y ago
The randomly going off thing can be made better by more expensive detectors. Sure, you need an electrician. This looks like lamenting the inconveniences of smoke detectors. My point is that hardwired smoke detectors function more consistent
18.
by tflol 2y ago
I'll submit and admit my experience is probably different than other regions in my country. However, from my professional experience in my region, the richest communities inspect for hardwired smoke detectors and the poorer communities
19.
by tflol 2y ago
It's because in less fortunate communities code enforcement isn't as strict so smoke detectors do not have to be hardwired. edit: removed abrasive language edit: Love the immediate downvoting. Please present your evidence that har
20.
by tflol 2y ago
This change is benefitting someone within the company, exactly one person, at the expense of millions of Users with no voice. Shouldn't a "free" product even approaching the popularity at this scale involve democracy? Lets le
21.
by tflol 2y ago
> If it does do that then yeah, there should be backlash. It's a threat. Disrespectful to users. Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't! If it doesn't maybe it will someday! When just the right person gets hired into exec.
22.
by tflol 2y ago
yeah youre missing that this suggests all usage is suddenly being used for training. the incentive for the company is avoiding suffering the opportunity cost of not using user data for training. the aggression of this post is weirder than t
23.
by tflol 2y ago
> What's the source of this rot? Powerful people in the company are trying to get "Integrated AI into an existing product with overwhelming resulting engagement" onto their resume.
24.
by tflol 2y ago
here: https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB1047/id/2919384 and a helpful definition as you parse this: (f) “Covered model” means an artificial intelligence model that meets either of the following criteria: (1
25.
by tflol 2y ago
fitting this fight club quote into context: Now, should we [care about getting sued]? Take the number of [copilot users] in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of [a user getting sued], B, multiply by the average out-of-court settle
26.
by tflol 2y ago
> Microsoft already declared they'll take care of any copyright lawsuits related to Copilot. How very kind of them! edit: it's almost like you, as a user, get a taste of having so much money youre legally untouchable!
27.
by tflol 2y ago
oh so this is what google facebook elon musk microsoft does to collect/share user data then get slammed with affordable fines later. I surprised this quote hasnt come to mind at reading those article
28.
by tflol 2y ago
> The researchers found that a pulse duration that minuscule doesn't result in any appreciable skin damage unless the laser is firing at that same spot at one shot per millisecond for a duration of 2,000 milliseconds Haha so if this
29.
by tflol 2y ago
according to all the opponents and team mates I had, everyone pretty good but me :)
30.
by tflol 2y ago
a hack solution to your problem could be to become romantically involved with every option in as little time as possible

More ›