6 ms·
You're saying there's less incentive for widespread automated attacks on personal devices? edit: Changing the subject to insulting me is a bad way to conclude.
by tflol 2y ago
You're saying there's less incentive for widespread automated attacks on personal devices?
edit: Changing the subject to insulting me is a bad way to conclude. You're creating an illusion the debate is concluded in your favor instead of responding to points. I don't think any of my points had a sound argument against them.
- rainonmoon 2y agoNo brother, I'm not, but I'm starting to feel that what I am saying might be beyond the likelihood of comprehension. Look, I'm a big fan of NAT. Huge. It's not a security control. Neither is v6. It sure is cool though.