sylware

19 ms·

1.
by sylware 5d ago
I know (like selling software without official technical support), I was asking if actual and real hacking did occure.
2.
by sylware 5d ago
In this case, they are probably big tech brain washed and lack a lot of experience/perspective. I remember the time when I was warned again corpos: nice in the first decade, then nasty afterwards.
3.
by sylware 6d ago
What's they were hacked and their current work in progress 'stolen'? On my open source projects, there is always a big "WIP" messy phase which I don't "really" publish... because it is messy.
4.
by sylware 6d ago
A elite dev is not someone who is "not doing any mistakes" (if that has a meaning in the first place) A dev is much more likely to be qualified as elite when you look at how he/she handles his/her own 'real' mi
5.
by sylware 6d ago
Huh? Re-using advances done by others is necessary in maths. This is how hard sciences do progress.
6.
by sylware 6d ago
Then if those BOTS are using whatwg web engines, what are your options? Not to mention, they could be click farms with real humans behind, then what can you do?
7.
by sylware 8d ago
It is much much worse than that: the real jail is the "web javascript" of the web engines of the whatwg cartel, well roughly speaking.
8.
by sylware 8d ago
Then you are of extremely bad faith? come on...
9.
by sylware 8d ago
It is all about that single data point, which means that detector was big enough for that data point.
10.
by sylware 8d ago
Ofc a timer will be set per connection and has to be only one part of a whole global and probably fine-grained connection policy ! Their only purpose compared to such timer, is, in their current state to create a hard dependency on exactly
11.
by sylware 8d ago
I saw bellard neural net compression benchmarks. If you have time and performant system, based on the semantic of the data to compress, neural net seems tough to beat. It is a matter of good compromises: speed and efficacy. I even wonder if
12.
by sylware 9d ago
Isn't that XZ?
13.
by sylware 9d ago
Real BOTs are more and more using whatwg cartel web engines, namely this has an end. If not all, namely the end was already reached. The ones not using them are more likely to be shadowpaid hackers by the whatwg cartel to ruin anything nosc
14.
by sylware 9d ago
They have to keep in mind: it will be more expensive (significantly, and in competent people, not only $$$) as you cannot beat big tech with their thousands of billions of $ and the fact they are scaled on a worldwide scope. And with a long
15.
by sylware 9d ago
Keep in mind that those front-ends are, in general, much more friendly towards noscript/basic HTML browsers than the official front-ends broke a few year ago. (well, nitter was at the time) Don't think the 'whatwg cartel&#x27
16.
by sylware 10d ago
I don't recall to have had a twitter account. Because it has been hostile to noscript/basic HTML browsers. I could use a web API with some token, but it is impossible to create an account and generates such API tokens without a we
17.
by sylware 10d ago
So this is a big enough detector? That would mean they need to wait for such events to occur again and again towards this "5sigmas". Hopefully, other aparatus elsewhere are big enough too in order to spot similar events.
18.
by sylware 13d ago
This is statistical significance ! WE NEED A BIGGER DETECTOR! GI'ME MONEY!
19.
by sylware 13d ago
The javascript web is. Restore the interop with noscript/basic HTML and it will lean towards sanity, something lost a few years ago.
20.
by sylware 14d ago
There will be RISC-V implementions specific to many use cases of CPUs. I have to admit we were more in the "desktop" use case, then the 7GHz (I don't know how they will manage to keep the backend reasonably fed without severe
21.
by sylware 14d ago
Well, everything is open source, I have a partial and very limited (but currently enough for my needs) linker for x86_64 and RISC-V 64bits (but written in plain and simple C which compiles with tinycc and cproc/qbe!). I even have an EL
22.
by sylware 17d ago
This is the wrong end of the issue. ELF for executables and dynamic libs is obsolete on modern hardware (same for microsoft PE+). I am now using for most of my projects a exe/dynamic lib format of my own. This file format is so miminal
23.
by sylware 18d ago
That one of the reasons which makes noscript/basic HTML a good thing (there are other additional reasons, one of the main is interop with small web engines, aka not "whatwg cartel"). Slap a 1D or simple 2D document (simple ta
24.
by sylware 19d ago
The real core of the issue is actually the complexity/size and core design of media container/codec file formats.
25.
by sylware 20d ago
Last time I read something about Zen6 it was 6GHz. So I guess the IBM stuff is "server slow" then. I wish RISC-V microarchitectures would get access to 2nm silicon processes, because RISC-V at 7GHz... yummy.
26.
by sylware 20d ago
So why the 2nm x86 chips are clocked so low? Why couldn't they be 6GHz? x86_64 ISA did it again? That said IBM should add RISC-V support.
27.
by sylware 21d ago
If Apple does design a RISC-V frontend to their MX microarchitecture... ARM better keep those ISA license fees close to zero.
28.
by sylware 21d ago
lean from a technical point of view: size and complexity. That would include the SDK, namely the complexity of the syntax of used computer language (for instance excluding de facto c++ and similar), the build system, the amount of dependenc
29.
by sylware 21d ago
Yep, you compare chips on the same level of silicon process. I was curious to see how far RISC-V still have to go from a microarchitecture stand point, but even in the same silicon process level, there are other things to take into account:
30.
by sylware 22d ago
Wonder how it will fare when infering frontier models or 10T+ parameters. For coding, in order to get "quality" results, you will need those frontier models with their whole weights.

More ›