Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
stinkbeetle
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
8d ago
No I'm not people are just pretending not to understand. Either that or they're so incredibly stupid I find it hard to believe. > Yes possibly so I'd have to see the evidence for [thing A] > Oh no, I don't need evi
2.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
8d ago
But it could equally apply, right? Let's see what OP says.
3.
▲
The Impacts of Guaranteed Basic Income on Crime Perpetration and Victimization
(nber.org)
2 points
by
stinkbeetle
9d ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
9d ago
> But if Meta is truly interested in prioritizing the safety of users, the board should request the resignation of Mark Zuckerberg and restructure to put safety above profit. It is singularly idiotic that people think people, companies,
5.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
10d ago
Are you talking about Africa and the Middle East?
6.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
10d ago
I was referencing the claims made in the post I replied to. I can't imagine what it is you're having so much difficulty with about that.
7.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
11d ago
All the comments I have written in this thread have been addressing the comment they replied to.
8.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
12d ago
Oh no, I don't need evidence that governments are dirty hives of corrupt incompetent criminals, leeches, and parasites.
9.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
12d ago
Yes possibly so I'd have to see the evidence for that, but my point is it's great that such a large majority of people are now well aware of the horrific and disgusting corruption, inefficiency, and incompetence in governments.
10.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
12d ago
I remember when this used to be a far right conspiracy theory.
11.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
18d ago
This is really just restating the assertion I'm asking about. Previous work also thought their use cases fit the needs. Everything changes all the time in computing, so there are lots of differences. I'm not asking if things are d
12.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
18d ago
> Whilst processing in memory is clearly the future How clear is that? The idea has been around for about 60 years, and many attempts made by people who thought the same thing. Maybe this time it'll be the future.
13.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
19d ago
> The western world has more or less come together to reduce emissions. If you look at US for instance emissions are down in abs terms. Not relative to gdp or per capital but total emissions. This holds even if you adjust for trade. It c
14.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
19d ago
Hah. Australia's economy is built entirely around two things. 1. Extracting fossil fuels and minerals. 2. "services". During a global catastrophe Australia would run out of fuel within a few months, fertilizer not long after
15.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
20d ago
Sure. And you can run ARM workloads in hardware ARM mode.
16.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
21d ago
ARM can emulate z workloads. https://hercules-390.github.io/html/index.html (or QEMU, for partition level emulation).
17.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
24d ago
This chart https://statbase.org/data/mex-prevalence-of-obesity-among-ad... Says that obesity was shooting up in Mexico before that. The obesity rate doubled in the 15 years before NAFTA. After NAFTA the rate doubled ag
18.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
24d ago
This is extremely complicated though, and generally misunderstood by internet experts. There might be some trivial situational examples where a soldier can plainly see an order would be a crime. Executing a prisoner for example. Orders like
19.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
24d ago
> You seem to think the US government is a single monolithic entity. Strawman. That is an invention entirely of your imagination. Nowhere did I claim or imply this. > orders that contradict the law. They are to be subservient to civil
20.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
24d ago
> IDK what is covered by "liberal democracies", You could always look it up if you're curious. > but in the specific military at hand every individual member takes an oath to uphold the Constitution regardless of contra
21.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
24d ago
Right. Laws passed by the elected civilian government. This is not some wild far right maga conspiracy theory to think that the military must be subservient to and separate from the government, just because the Americans elected a president
22.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
25d ago
The military is supposed to be subservient to the civilian government in liberal democracies.
23.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
28d ago
Yes, though you'd be inclined to suspect the audio stack having the bug rather than the display compositor.
24.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
29d ago
Most people do want to be and think they are good people. People have very diverse understandings of what it is to be a good person. Very much rooted in tribalism and self-interest, like most any social animal. You obviously can not build a
25.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
29d ago
Once the enormous diversity-strength becomes undeniable even to the far right and welfare becomes even better I'm sure those restrictions will be reversed.
26.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
1mo ago
It does. Some people would still be interested but lots of people would not. The net interestingness would certainly decrease.
27.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
1mo ago
People think lots of things are good boat names. There's no reason there couldn't have more than one Unsinkable that hadn't sunk, and most boats aren't retired by sinking, so Unsinkable II would fit right in.
28.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
1mo ago
> FX!32 was good compared to what was available elsewhere (including for Itanium IIRC). I am not saying it had to compete with fully with x86 on consumer desktops from beginning, but it would have been more stable position, especially wi
29.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
1mo ago
Not true, they all did workstations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARCstation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_RS/6000 https://www.reddit.com/r/vintagecomputing/c
30.
▲
by
stinkbeetle
1mo ago
> I think you're right overall that Itanium is used too often as the reason why all the RISC platforms died/were cancelled, as if they would have had healthy futures had Itanium simply not existed, but I do wonder about Alpha.
More ›