solenoid0937

5 ms·

1.
by solenoid0937 13h ago
It's impossible for the typical HN cynic/conspiracy theorist.
2.
by solenoid0937 3d ago
"AI diversity" does nothing when AIs can attack at incredible speed, when compute imbalances exist, etc
3.
by solenoid0937 4d ago
"Don't you understand?! It's all a marketing exercise!" I yell as grey goo consumes me and my family.
4.
by solenoid0937 4d ago
I dunno, being a Culture Mind sounds pretty damn good. Or even just a death-optional citizen in the Culture.
5.
by solenoid0937 6d ago
Irrelevant when they say they're competitive with Fable and Astra. They don't get to then roll that back and then say "but we have less compute!" You're either competitive or not.
6.
by solenoid0937 6d ago
> in this case too they didn't actually have the solution Given the size and recall of the biggest models, it's not unreasonable to assume that a single pertinent conversation would make it into the training data. I would almos
7.
by solenoid0937 8d ago
Exactly. It is common knowledge that all the AI companies have terrible margins. IMO tokens are the cheapest they'll ever be as these companies compete for users.
8.
by solenoid0937 9d ago
Aware that the rug will be pulled. The market runs at a loss
9.
by solenoid0937 9d ago
They'll get through it. You don't just halt progress because the transition will be rough. We'd be pre-industrial if we thought like this.
10.
by solenoid0937 9d ago
That's happening anyways, they don't need more organic data for that. Also, who cares? Such is the price of progress, I'm not selfish enough to hold humanity back because "muh job"
11.
by solenoid0937 9d ago
I hope everyone recognized the cheap tokens as a transparent ploy to gain more users before jacking up prices. This was obvious from day one.
12.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
lmao, PR description says: > Fixes a number of small issues picked up during LLM scans
13.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
Very easy to download abliterated GLM 5.3 and start doing bad things with it, and it'll be easier when Astra-level variants are available Just because you don't do a bad thing doesn't mean other people won't. It's w
14.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
> State actors, professional criminals will have same or better capabilities State actors do but they are not unhinged enough to use this to cause massive loss of life, unlike random crazy people with access to a computer. Professional c
15.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
You absolutely can have (C) without widespread (A), you just need to limit the audience that gets the tools, and in fact the big labs are already engaging in (C) in collaboration with the government and vendors of critical software. That yo
16.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
Did you know (C) is possible without causing mass chaos that results in many people dying? In ways that don't give every script kiddie access to (A, B)? It turns out you can give defenders the opportunity to front-run, at least on the
17.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
Yes, I'm aware that the HN majority is a hyper-libertarian echo chamber that loves to outsource the problem of "technology hurting regular people" if it means they get to keep their toys/investments. After all, who cares
18.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
Meaningless phrase used to dismiss arguments, please engage with the actual argument. I don't think you understand how bad it will be if anyone has a button that can hack anything, our infrastructure is not ready for this. Actual peo
19.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
HuggingFace had no interest in squeezing a few million dollars out of OpenAI in the midst of being acquired by Nvidia. The optics are bad for HF as well because they gladly host abliterated models with safety training removed. When Astra&#x
20.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
The support of OSS models on HN just days after finding out about the message board incident is so bizarre to me. Do you guys really not comprehend the impact of giving every script kiddie an Astra-equivalent model to play with, this time w
21.
by solenoid0937 11d ago
> Change the law There is a huge gulf between what the law allows, and what being a decent person requires, and that gulf is called "being a scumbag." We should not alter the law to prohibit everything in that gulf, because i
22.
by solenoid0937 11d ago
Let's take the latest blog post from Anthropic on how their models hacked companies. What exactly comes off as "bragging?" How were the RSPs not upheld? I'm reading their Aug 2026 Risk Report and nothing indicates malfea
23.
by solenoid0937 11d ago
It's a few hundred tokens. If you are worried about a few hundred tokens you are in trouble, forget about "infinite money."
24.
by solenoid0937 11d ago
Not enough people blame VCs and the people that fund evil things. They are accessories. They knew this would happen, let's not pretend they didn't. They are just shameless because making money has been canonized as a greater moral
25.
by solenoid0937 11d ago
My code being correct 99% of the and costing 5x more tokens is vastly preferable to my code only being correct 90% of the time and using fewer tokens.
26.
by solenoid0937 12d ago
> At some point, the leading labs must change their development practices What indicates that this has not been done?
27.
by solenoid0937 12d ago
(c) there are so many undiscovered vulnerabilities that it doesn't make sense for them to offer a decent payout
28.
by solenoid0937 12d ago
So this is just delegating certain work to dumber models? I certainly wouldn't use Gemini 2.5 Flash (!!?) for code writing as suggested. I've never had an issue with Codex or Claude reading massive files, they're really good
29.
by solenoid0937 12d ago
> yet they are also responsible for the highest profile misalignment incidents so far They are the only ones posting about them or admitting to them. That does not mean "the most misalignment incidents so far." You don't k
30.
by solenoid0937 12d ago
> before then deciding to release it to the public. You mean, with safeguards that block the dangerous things? Safeguards so aggressive that the public complains about them?

More ›