Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sixothree
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
sixothree
4d ago
Can we really trust it to honor your request to stop using the internet? After hearing them speak on this subject, I have my doubts it will honor your request so quickly and easily.
2.
▲
by
sixothree
4d ago
You're making a huge assumption that it does not remember wifi passwords and that it would actually honor your request. You're assuming it does not communicate with/via other LG devices owned by neighbors. You're assumin
3.
▲
by
sixothree
4d ago
You really aren't paying attention. They weren't talking about distribution channels. They were talking about capturing user data - "we know who's in the LG household. We know which devices are there. We know what you&#x
4.
▲
by
sixothree
5d ago
We really are in a bad spot aren't we. In so many ways, strategically, reputationally, introspectively. It's hard to imagine coming back from this.
5.
▲
by
sixothree
5d ago
But it's literally not the name of the emoji. Edit: It was my understanding the official name was "Smiling Face with Open Hands Emoji".
6.
▲
by
sixothree
5d ago
Not sure about humorless, but I'd honestly rather hang out with people who are serious in some way and welcoming to people not in their "in-group".
7.
▲
by
sixothree
5d ago
I really wish Honda would release the CRV plug-in hybrid in the states. But all we get is some weird hydrogen monstrosity. China has all electric vehicles with gas generators to charge the battery. That would make this work for my scenarios
8.
▲
by
sixothree
6d ago
Stackable bins work too. Need various sizes as backup as you accumulate though.
9.
▲
by
sixothree
6d ago
While he avoids using the actual PLE acronym, he does actually describe the concept quite well. I think you may enjoy this video. Specifically around 5 minutes into the video is the part you're looking for. https://www.youtu
10.
▲
by
sixothree
6d ago
Which harness are you using?
11.
▲
by
sixothree
7d ago
I kept thinking they were revealing glasses the way they gave a feature list before describing the item in question.
12.
▲
by
sixothree
7d ago
It certainly feels like another 10% of the total effort expended would have made this product viable. And I keep saying that about Microsoft releases. It feel like an enormous effect to get to product release then complete abandonment - no
13.
▲
by
sixothree
7d ago
I couldn't agree more with the criticism being too much. The negativity adds up and drowns a thread so much faster than the neutral comments. I don't know the reason it feels that way. And it seems so pervasive in so many places.
14.
▲
by
sixothree
8d ago
Gen X here. Having grown up in the 80's I remember multiple occasions where someone would ask "what are you going to do with a computer?". As in, what could a computer possibly be useful for. Just imagine someone asking this
15.
▲
by
sixothree
8d ago
You might be surprised at the developer documentation for OS8088 (recently posted on HN). https://os8088.com/developers/ Instead of describing to the user how to setup their dev environment, section 3 basically instruc
16.
▲
by
sixothree
8d ago
Or worse, buries an important detail somewhere in the text. Tangentially, over the weekend I had claude ask me if I wanted to continue with UIM-001. I couldn't find UIM-001 in any document it referenced creating or any text it had prev
17.
▲
by
sixothree
9d ago
I think this video is completely misleading about what LG does, versus what the TV is capable of doing. I tried watching this yesterday and was pretty offended by the lack of clarity and closed it.
18.
▲
by
sixothree
10d ago
Or allow posting (maybe to certain boards) by accounts only of a certain age. These both assume they haven't created hundreds of accounts long ago.
19.
▲
by
sixothree
13d ago
I don't even need to watch that video to be reminded of the tagline - "Audacity says no!". Agreed this is a great watch for pretty much any developer.
20.
▲
by
sixothree
13d ago
They should make the catalog online and available so people know how they can help.
21.
▲
by
sixothree
14d ago
I wouldn't exactly describe one person as "the government".
22.
▲
by
sixothree
14d ago
I didn't quite want to say it myself since I've been so negative sometimes lately. But it was something I noticed and picking a random profile to view was pretty stomach turning. But I get there is backlash. Not everyone lives in
23.
▲
by
sixothree
14d ago
Where did I say something was wrong with them? I do think it is worth questioning why an entire thread is filled specifically and exclusively with cartoon character avatars. Pick a thread, pretty much any thread on bsky with 20+ replies and
24.
▲
by
sixothree
14d ago
I honestly suspect that if he said he was using OpenAI instead, the results would be completely different. Ever since the DOD thing, pretty much every sub, thread, or reference to Claude, has resulted in vitriol. It mostly materializes as o
25.
▲
by
sixothree
14d ago
Does every single one of these posters have a cartoon avatar? What's going on here?
26.
▲
by
sixothree
14d ago
Closing tabs and I came back across conventionalbranch.org. I know this isn't your argument, just passing on info. But holy heck, I really have to argue with their literal first point. All lowercase, for what reason? It's never ex
27.
▲
by
sixothree
15d ago
> People have been doing this for years. Tell me something I don't know. My point is that it's usage has seen a _measurable_ increase where I work over the last two years. I don't think I have a single "feature/*
28.
▲
by
sixothree
15d ago
If you use "Feat/" at my company you will get called out. No abbreviations allowed. Capitalization matters. But that doesn't change my argument. For me, this popularity is graphable. Telling me it's a convention doe
29.
▲
by
sixothree
15d ago
And my point is that this pattern is now more popular than it was 3 years ago. Similar to people using the phrase "load bearing". For me, this popularity is graphable. Telling me it's a convention doesn't change that fac
30.
▲
by
sixothree
15d ago
I'm not sure why you're arguing that when it's not the point of the statement. YOU have been using that convention. Now do an analysis of the people at your company. Regex the pattern over time if you want to make an argument
More ›