sincerely

14 ms·

1.
by sincerely 6d ago
Some people still make wood furniture by hand too. Do what makes you happy. Just don't get caught up insisting that you deserve to be paid for it.
2.
by sincerely 12d ago
If anyone wants to know more about the chess model: https://lczero.org/blog/2024/12/the-leela-piece-odds-challen... You can choose which piece it's missing. It's humbling to lose starting up a queen
3.
by sincerely 23d ago
A much better article about the phenomenon: https://open.substack.com/pub/ramble/p/the-tang-dynasty-was-...
4.
by sincerely 1mo ago
I must be illiterate. Ofc. Sorry
5.
by sincerely 1mo ago
edit: totally wrong
6.
by sincerely 1mo ago
I’m not even sure what would be gained by formal verification of a GUI
7.
by sincerely 2mo ago
Well there is no “roof rule” on the page they linked
8.
by sincerely 3mo ago
Are there any other self-guided online university level CS courses like this?
9.
by sincerely 3mo ago
Well there are plenty of places that aren’t in anyone’s backyard
10.
by sincerely 4mo ago
LLM spam account
11.
by sincerely 4mo ago
Who is "we"? Lol
12.
by sincerely 4mo ago
I would be surprised if, in the "mature" future of AI tools/products, the labs building the models are also selling/building to end users like they are now.
13.
by sincerely 4mo ago
>I think I'm at 1 success out of 15 attempts for Gemini to explain how to do something in Google Sheets/Docs, though, so I'm not hopeful that anyone can actually implement this. People love to talk about this as one of the
14.
by sincerely 4mo ago
This post is full of AI flair unfortunately
15.
by sincerely 4mo ago
This is quite interesting, but the blatantly AI generated explanations are like an anti-signal for quality
16.
by sincerely 4mo ago
Me explaining to a teacher why i cheated on the test: well did you stop to consider the cognitive load of doing the problems myself and how much easier it was to cheat?
17.
by sincerely 4mo ago
I can’t agree more, this “our software is open source but we have unwritten rules about how you can use it or we’ll attempt to shame you” attitude is absurd
18.
by sincerely 5mo ago
I think they're talking about conjectures that are unproven but seem "likely true" and people build further math off the assumption. E.G Reimann hypothesis
19.
by sincerely 5mo ago
This is exhaustively covered in the article
20.
by sincerely 5mo ago
Not a problem if they're offering unlimited, lol
21.
by sincerely 5mo ago
Just like me :)
22.
by sincerely 5mo ago
This comment seems addressed to the portion of the population that both doesn’t know how to safely buy illegal drugs and also is able to determine which drug sellers are reputable. i can only assume this is an extremely small amount of peop
23.
by sincerely 6mo ago
AI slop account
24.
by sincerely 6mo ago
Wouldn’t those second order effects be downstream of the first order effect of people being tricked?
25.
by sincerely 6mo ago
Chess is absolutely not a solved game, outside of very limited situations like endgames. Just because a best move exists does not mean we (or even an engine) know what it is
26.
by sincerely 6mo ago
AI account
27.
by sincerely 6mo ago
Ok, so all this to say that yes, the Mac Mini is totally unnecessary and massively overspecced for what is actually being done on-device.
28.
by sincerely 6mo ago
Well the alternative is them just never upstreaming and maintaining their own fork, which seems worse for everybody
29.
by sincerely 7mo ago
This already exists in visual art: timelapses of the drawing process were being used to prove that pictures weren’t AI generated, until someone made a program that takes a picture and generates a fake progress vid
30.
by sincerely 7mo ago
I think theyre referencing the previous Google employee protests of the company working with the Us Military

More ›