6 ms·

Well there is no “roof rule” on the page they linked

• serial_dev 2mo ago
  It might have been AutoCorrect, and the “social rules” the original comment makes hundred times more sense that way
  • dxdm 2mo ago
    The social rules page links to the code of conduct, which contains a rule about the roof. The most sensible interpretation to me is that OP wanted to comment on both, possibly forgetting that they had to follow a link to the roof rule, or maybe actively considering both pages to be a single unit. That would be the"strongest interpretation" of OPs comment, which the local guidelines prefer us to respond to.
    • andrew_eu 2mo ago
      I'm honestly surprised how controversial this sub thread became. To put it to rest -- this is indeed correct. I commented on the roof rule but didn't link to the code of conduct because doing so didn't really seem to add anything that a reader couldn't find on their own.
  • zahlman 2mo ago
    I can't imagine what word might have been autocorrected to "roof" that would make more sense here.
  • albedoa 2mo ago
    Pause and consider the joint probability that anything was autocorrected to "roof rule" and that it just so happens to be the name of one of their rules.