silverlight

9 ms·

1.
Lark: Open-source realtime database, Firebase SDK compatible(lark.sh)
6 points by silverlight 24d ago|0 comments
2.
Show HN: Lark, OSS realtime database, drop-in compatible with Firebase SDKs(github.com)
4 points by silverlight 1mo ago|0 comments
3.
by silverlight 4mo ago
I'm on the latest version (2.1.154 as of this comment). Based on the timestamps on those Issues being reported I think it's happening on the latest version. I'm sure it will get fixed eventually/soon, just annoying to up
4.
by silverlight 4mo ago
Unfortunately they seem to have straight up broken Claude Code either with this release in the backend or the new CC version. Errors about "can't modify thinking blocks" are bricking long-running sessions: https://
5.
by silverlight 4mo ago
Google really can’t help themselves but to have some internal re-org kill off a public thing people are actively using. It’s honestly impressive how consistent they are.
6.
by silverlight 8mo ago
There was a moment about a week ago where Claude went down for about an hour. And right after it came back up it was clear a lot of people had given up and were not using it. It was probably 3x faster than usual. I got more done in the next
7.
by silverlight 8mo ago
Seems like a big opportunity for Google to consider keeping Gemini ad-free as a differentiator. They can afford to burn cash on it for a long time to come if they choose to do so.
8.
by silverlight 10mo ago
Glad to hear the impact was so muted. Thank you for the response!
9.
by silverlight 10mo ago
Did the client side JS being infected produce any issues which would have affected end users? As in if a web owner were on an affected version and deployed during the window would the end user of their site have had any negative impact?
10.
by silverlight 1y ago
Recently used a lot of HaxeUI for a game and it felt similar to this. A lot of components included out of the box that “just work” with some basic styling. And you can use CSS styling on top to further customize as needed. Works across a lo
11.
by silverlight 1y ago
Is this available somewhere to use?
12.
by silverlight 1y ago
Anyone using one as your daily driver for coding? Or tried and it didn’t keep?
13.
by silverlight 1y ago
Happy to support this, desperately needs to be changed.
14.
by silverlight 1y ago
I made one of the original posts on HN about this years ago after hearing about it from my CPA. Both then and now these changes make zero sense to me as a matter of good policy. I am also still surprised at the number of people in tech who
15.
by silverlight 2y ago
Somewhat related topic: anyone used something like the Luxedo to do a projection mapping? It seems like it’s more complicated and expensive but I love the idea of doing something cool to the house for Halloween and Christmas without having
16.
by silverlight 2y ago
I think that ideally, every project would be setup from scratch in the beginning to use t() tags or something similar to have translation keys so that setting up translations is as easy as swapping out what t() returns (from e.g. a config f
17.
by silverlight 2y ago
At Roll20 we just released a beta version of our new VTT engine which is powered by Babylon. The devs on the team have really enjoyed getting to use the modern workflow compared to the legacy decade-old stuff we were using before. Thanks Ba
18.
GitHub GraphQL Service Down?
2 points by silverlight 3y ago|0 comments
19.
by silverlight 3y ago
In the U.S. you have to actually file for a copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office if you actually want to bring a copyright suit against someone.
20.
by silverlight 4y ago
I don’t actually know how it works for paying yourself. But if you were paying someone else, in 2024 they would get 10k carried over from 2023 and $5k from 2024. You only get 10% the first year. I am not an accountant and this is not tax ad
21.
by silverlight 4y ago
I did contact my Congressional Representative but I would love to know what interest groups are working on this actively that I can support further. Thank you for sharing your own experience with your CPA as well.
22.
by silverlight 4y ago
Wow, thank you for that detailed explanation. Very interesting.
23.
by silverlight 4y ago
Research and Experimental. It’s what the tax code calls it. https://www.taxnotes.com/research/federal/usc26/174
24.
by silverlight 4y ago
So you're saying that the advice you got was that if it's a launched product, you can treat software development as an operating expense and just ignore the fact that 174 says software development is an R&E expense? I mean tha
25.
by silverlight 4y ago
I think the main difference is: 1) You can't just go get a loan for "a software" like you can "a widget maker." Most businesses with these large capital assets get loans on them and then it works out nicely as you p
26.
by silverlight 4y ago
I have also been surprised since I found out at the lack of discussion. Based on this post, it seems like many people didn't know. I assume a lot more are going to find out as we get closer to actually filing taxes. What I've hear
27.
by silverlight 4y ago
Yeah, the 162 treatment defense is the thing I've seen on here that seems like it may hold some water, and I'm planning to go back to my CPA and talk about it with them. To be clear my companies are going to be fine either way, bu
28.
by silverlight 4y ago
If anyone knows of a CPA who thinks this isn't how it works now, please let me know their contact info, as I would love to pay them to advise me on this and get a third opinion.
29.
by silverlight 4y ago
Did you talk to them about this specific change recently? Because how you're describing it is how it used to work, just not starting this year. Also thanks for Reddit ;)
30.
by silverlight 4y ago
Assuming that your shop took in 1.5M in revenue, then yes it would be (500k + 0.9 * 1M) because for the first year you only get 1/10th of the deduction. So it's like: Year 1: 0.1 Year 2-5: 0.2 Year 6: 0.1

More ›