Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
saeranv
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
1.
▲
A Top Law Firm Went from Standing Up to Trump to Bending the Knee
(nytimes.com)
6 points
by
saeranv
16h ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
Phoebe Gates' startup Phia faces cookie stuffing allegations
(bloomberg.com)
10 points
by
saeranv
1mo ago
|
2 comments
3.
▲
by
saeranv
2mo ago
From the article: "The project’s binary distributions didn’t include the required MIT license notice for the llama.cpp code they were shipping. This isn’t a matter of open-source etiquette, the MIT license has exactly one major require
4.
▲
by
saeranv
3mo ago
I said before that the function shape changes as you're updating the parameters that govern the function but that's actually very misleading, (sorry), since the kernel parameters are only indirectly governing the function. What th
5.
▲
by
saeranv
3mo ago
> Why is the 'true process' changing here? I understand our best guess or model is changing with new observations, but the true process should not be changing. If it actually is, then the formulation should be changed to isolat
6.
▲
by
saeranv
5mo ago
Greg Brockman honestly sounds like a psychopath: > In 2017, Amodei hired Page Hedley, a former public-interest lawyer, to be OpenAI’s policy and ethics adviser. In an early PowerPoint presentation to executives, Hedley outlined how OpenA
7.
▲
by
saeranv
5mo ago
For me, it was when I found out Greg Brockman's MAGA donations. From wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Brockman#Personal_life ): Brockman and his wife were the biggest donors to Donald Trump's Supe
8.
▲
by
saeranv
8mo ago
This is awesome. How do you integrate morphology into the simulation? Does morphology effect movement (via area friction or mass impact on momentum) or metabolism (via area/volume ratio)?
9.
▲
by
saeranv
9mo ago
Archive link: https://archive.ph/IX9bP
10.
▲
Why does AI write like that?
(nytimes.com)
2 points
by
saeranv
9mo ago
|
3 comments
11.
▲
by
saeranv
9mo ago
That presumes that languages didn't evolve independently across different communities. The fact that different ancient languages have completely different grammatical structures, for example, provides some evidence of this.
12.
▲
Greg Egan's Horror Stories
(gregegan.net)
3 points
by
saeranv
2y ago
|
0 comments
13.
▲
by
saeranv
2y ago
A simple counter example here is instinctual behaviour. A sea turtle is born, and with little to no guidance, experimentation, or exploration heads to the sea. That knowledge is embedded at birth. I think the analogy of the brain as hardwar
14.
▲
by
saeranv
2y ago
> The idea is that if you can produce an accurate probably distribution over the next bit/byte/token... But how can you get credible probability distributions from the LLMs? My understanding is that the outputs specifically can
15.
▲
The children who remember their past lives
(washingtonpost.com)
6 points
by
saeranv
2y ago
|
1 comments
16.
▲
by
saeranv
2y ago
I think they are accounting for the entire context, they specifically write out: >> P(next_word|previous_words) So the "next_word" is conditioned on "previous_words" (plural), which I took to mean the joint distrib
17.
▲
by
saeranv
3y ago
I read through the whole LW post, and think there's enough troubling evidence here that she shouldn't be dismissed. It certainly shouldn't be flagged. I initially was leaning to this being a high possibility of a delusion spr
18.
▲
He won a Nobel Prize. Then he started denying climate change
(washingtonpost.com)
2 points
by
saeranv
3y ago
|
4 comments
19.
▲
'Ray, this is a religion': How Bridgewater lost two top hires
(nymag.com)
202 points
by
saeranv
3y ago
|
159 comments
20.
▲
by
saeranv
3y ago
I sure hope all the HN commentators confidently predicting this would never happen because of his large donations to the democrats see this.
21.
▲
by
saeranv
3y ago
Thanks for the correction, my understanding of electricity is shaky, and I was assuming everything connected to a wall outlet is AC-driven, unless there's a boxy inverter along the cord like a laptop, but you're correct, that'
22.
▲
by
saeranv
3y ago
I disagree with other commentators here arguing that there's no benefit this monitor would bring over simply reducing screen brightness. But I also think the claim made by the article here is at best, miscommunicated: that the bounced
23.
▲
by
saeranv
3y ago
That kind of innate skeptism is good science though.
24.
▲
Point Cloud Utils – A Python library for 3D point clouds and meshes
(fwilliams.info)
1 points
by
saeranv
3y ago
|
0 comments
25.
▲
by
saeranv
3y ago
Unfortunately, the HN crowd has an incredibly naive view of what journalism is. I think it's mainly a product of ignorance, typically conflating op-eds with the journalism, and false-equivalencies that lump the Washington Post into the
26.
▲
by
saeranv
3y ago
To your credit, at least you got data to begin investigating your claim. I'm usually to lazy to do that...
27.
▲
by
saeranv
3y ago
Okay fair enough, but why look at female founders in terms total valuation percent, then? I think my point about the distortion from the (likely) exponential distribution of total valuation still stands, although in this case with regards t
28.
▲
by
saeranv
3y ago
Careful, this seems to be falling for the prosecutor's fallacy where the probabilities aren't normalized to account for base rates of the hypothesis occuring. So in this case, the percent of successful valuations that have a femal
29.
▲
by
saeranv
3y ago
Good point. So when we try and evaluate a person's "social radar", we should probably limit ourselves to cases where they are the minority dissenter and the person they dislike is given the opportunity, since it gives us the
30.
▲
by
saeranv
3y ago
Funny, I was thinking that the only disadvantage of the previous example is that you don't get any feedback from comments. The ability to label your "posts" seems pretty powerful too. Then your blog can be navigated by your t
More ›