rosebay

5 ms·

1.
by rosebay 3y ago
The article directly quotes google giving a clear answer…. “Google replied to the tweet directly, saying, “Bard is an early experiment based on Large Language Models and will make mistakes. It is not trained on Gmail data. -JQ”.
2.
by rosebay 3y ago
Great explanation
3.
by rosebay 3y ago
Katex is truly great. Fun trivia facts - one of its developers also played a core role in React (she is a legend)
4.
by rosebay 3y ago
Thanks for sharing
5.
by rosebay 4y ago
I didn’t know IBM mainframes run the world? Just curious, care to expand?
6.
by rosebay 4y ago
I read the blog, was mortified but luckily others have already provided feedback in an earlier thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28325563 To the author’s credit, I loved that he is thinking analytically and he di
7.
by rosebay 4y ago
Wow! Cannot thank you enough for such an awesome site!
8.
by rosebay 4y ago
Why isn’t a Trie considered the fastest solution?
9.
by rosebay 4y ago
All I want is nominal types, if this is possible already, somebody please let me know!!
10.
by rosebay 4y ago
I tend to agree but would be happy to be proven wrong by more knowledgeable folks in these comments. However I assume here we are talking about dotted lists and not ‘proper’ ones?
11.
High Performance JavaScript – Structural Sharing and Copy-on-Write(raganwald.com)
2 points by rosebay 4y ago|0 comments
12.
by rosebay 4y ago
Thanks!
13.
by rosebay 4y ago
Unrelated but you most posted a comment many years back (below). Wondering if you have any tips on research / articles in this space? > Yes, very nice. But it needs an update on structured documents (tree-like, as in HTML). And, ide
14.
Ask HN: Should Google be concerned with ChatGPT
8 points by rosebay 4y ago|36 comments
15.
by rosebay 4y ago
That looks really good. P.s CodeMirror is awesome, by far the best editor plug-in on the web
16.
by rosebay 4y ago
This is clearly self promotion…and the multiple alt accounts / friend accounts to try to create a particular impression of the software…
17.
by rosebay 4y ago
I would agree
18.
by rosebay 4y ago
Agreed. I program in CL and other languages too. I find Java developers tend to have a stronger understanding of OOP and that might be behind your insight. For all its benefits, it feels like at times many CL users miss the point of OOP. CL
19.
by rosebay 4y ago
Closures don’t have inheritance or any of the other machinery that object oriented programming typically comes with. Perhaps saying they are light weight objects (where objects has its meaning as instances of classes) is a good way of sayin