rhaksw

6 ms·

1.
by rhaksw 1mo ago
> I've heard it argued that this is an antipattern. If the file is large, it will read the whole file. With Read or something similar, it can do a targeted search and read only the relevant portion. I suspect you're right and t
2.
by rhaksw 1mo ago
> @-mention files instead of naming them Love Claude, but the @ mention is broken in the desktop app. For the same project if I type the same query "@ephem" I get: CLI: https://imgur.com/a/VZMUCOa (good, r
3.
Show HN: GhostedWatch, an extension that detects silent removals on patriots.win(ghostedwatch.com)
3 points by rhaksw 2mo ago|0 comments
4.
by rhaksw 2y ago
> In the tussle between regulators and companies, companies are disadvantaged. When society once again properly separates governmental powers, it will restore balance, and then companies will no longer need to fear "regulators.&quot
5.
by rhaksw 2y ago
> "Tempo/MacQuake Palace" Confession: I ran that. Sorry, Apple– that was wrong! If I recall correctly, I'd grab the latest version from a private Hotline site, then re-host it on my public server backed by a cable mod
6.
by rhaksw 2y ago
> The democratic element is in the selection of an executive every 4 years. That did nothing to help the fishery in this case. The burdens placed upon them came from a lower level bureaucrat, a decision that likely never crossed Trump&#x
7.
by rhaksw 2y ago
> I think it's more analogous to the overlap between police and prosecutors. Those both fall under the executive branch. Plus, Chevron deference was about the court's actions, not prosecutors'. > Another difference is
8.
by rhaksw 2y ago
This decision has more to do with the Court owning its own past mistake, where they deferred to executive agencies. But both the judiciary and the legislative enabled the executive to consolidate lawmaking and interpretive power, thus vio
9.
by rhaksw 2y ago
He's probably referring to Administrative Law Justices (ALJs), who are part of the executive, not the judiciary.
10.
by rhaksw 2y ago
The executive does not interpret law in the sense understood by the separation of powers. Interpretation is a judiciary power.
11.
by rhaksw 2y ago
> Chevron was based on the idea that if statutory text is ambiguous the people in charge of implementing said statute were best positioned to figure out what it meant Wouldn't it be odd if the police also acted as the judge in your
12.
by rhaksw 2y ago
It's more clear if you use the word vest and divest rather than delegation. Congress cannot divest its own legislative powers, nor can it vest them in another branch.
13.
by rhaksw 2y ago
Congress cannot divest its legislative power, nor can it vest interpretive power to executive-branch agencies. The judiciary interprets law— not Congress.
14.
by rhaksw 2y ago
I'd argue their success comes from making people think they're in an open discussion forum, or at least know when they're moderated, when in fact users get moderated left and right without their knowledge. And rather than add
15.
by rhaksw 2y ago
Interesting, it has a del.icio.us scraper. I still don't understand why that site disappeared, it was great. By my recollection, Yahoo bought it and killed it.
16.
by rhaksw 2y ago
Tons of mod tools built on top of shadow comment removals: crowd control, comment nuke, disruptive comment collapsing, contributor quality score, subreddit shadow bans via automoderator ... Check your account here [1], you probably have rem
17.
by rhaksw 3y ago
In the case of shadow banning, you haven't kicked them off your property. You're asking them to stay while you earn ad money from their attention. See the linked tweet for a more lawyerly argument in defense of shadow banning. The
18.
by rhaksw 3y ago
Thank you for the question. I can think of two reasons: (1) You wouldn't want someone to secretly remove or demote your own commentary. But secretive content moderation is extremely common on today's major platforms. In order to b
19.
by rhaksw 3y ago
Your comment isn't dismissive, but I do think users have a right to know where they've been moderated.
20.
by rhaksw 3y ago
Full moderation logs are different than showing submitters how their posts have been moderated. On HN, my understanding is that you (moderators) can penalize stories without the submitter's knowledge. But if HN instead disclosed that p
21.
by rhaksw 3y ago
I would prefer if the market decides, but there are a few non-trivial court cases coming up that may influence what happens. [1] https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/... [2] https
22.
by rhaksw 3y ago
I support transparent-to-the-author content moderation, and I suspect that is in the future for today's major platforms, whether they want it or not.
23.
by rhaksw 3y ago
> Wtf are you talking about? He’s literally telling us and has mentioned in the community many times that flagging quickly crushes a story. It's discussed in the link, and elsewhere [1]. Some mod actions on HN are transparent, some
24.
by rhaksw 3y ago
> alter the score on a story It's cool that you set up your own instance, but do you see no problem with covertly altering the score of a story? Such secrecy leads to oversized, over-trusted forums, and is what this post seeks to ad
25.
by rhaksw 3y ago
Communities would get a good sense for the frequency if forums would simply disclose content moderation to the submitting users. Offending users would learn what's not allowed and share that with the community. But today's forums
26.
by rhaksw 3y ago
> Robin89, can you please fix the text? know that was just a mistaken good-faith assumption but it's super wrong. How can he/we verify it's wrong? The down-weighting you describe is not visible to users. Even OP won't
27.
by rhaksw 3y ago
> a browser extension. Already exists, but feel free to upgrade or make your own: https://github.com/reveddit/real-time-extension
28.
by rhaksw 3y ago
It was in the official docs: > Often, it may be advantageous to shadowban a troll or spammer rather than ban them - an actual ban simply tells them that it's time to create a new account. With a shadowban, they don't know they&
29.
Shadow Bans Only Fool Humans, Not Bots(removednews.com)
14 points by rhaksw 3y ago|6 comments
30.
by rhaksw 3y ago
> At least according to the words attributed to the former head of safety there, it IS complicated. Yoel is talking about telling people WHY their content was actioned. Such removal reasons are not categorized according to Twitter's

More ›