5 ms·

He's probably referring to Administrative Law Justices (ALJs), who are part of the executive, not the judiciary.

• freejazz 2y ago
  But they do have judicial oversight. It's a really bizarre response in the context of this thread.
  • Gormo 2y ago
    They do now. Before Chevron was reversed, the stuff that appeared to be judicial oversight was being done by the agencies themselves, not by the judiciary.
    • freejazz 2y ago
      That's not true at all.
      • Gormo 2y ago
        That is literally what Chevron doctrine is.
        • freejazz 2y ago
          In part, yes. But it's certainly not the whole of the issue and you are purposefully misrepresenting the nature of litigation here.