reroute1

9 ms·

1.
by reroute1 6y ago
Yes and reasonable people understand this and don't need censorship. Who would hate a platform for not removing people for just honestly disagreeing and talking? Inciting violence and cheating the system is a different story and the ob
2.
by reroute1 6y ago
I'm responding because you and gp are talking about precise measurements. I'm asking basic questions about if and how you can measure it and you respond like it's "injecting ideas"... What lol? Can you not be a baby
3.
by reroute1 6y ago
Why does it need to be observable? What if it's there and unobservable? Then what? Do people who break the rules normally do so in a highly observable way?
4.
by reroute1 6y ago
That's a ridiculous assumption to make. You have no idea what percent of any crowd is there to appease someone else and any claim otherwise is silly. What if someone is there for more than one reason(Hint everyone)? Do they not count a
5.
by reroute1 6y ago
I feel this is not a well thought out perspective. They have ""bad karma" according to your subjective view of the world. What if that's how they view you? What if a human is the worst thing you could be?
6.
by reroute1 6y ago
your website looks like a joke and your "company" sounds awful
7.
by reroute1 6y ago
Interested to know who is paying you $1k for a blog post...
8.
by reroute1 6y ago
40 hours for 5 dollars is well beyond working peanuts that's just robbing people... Even Fiverr isn't close to this rate
9.
by reroute1 6y ago
Who is disagreeing with this? The issue is that people disagree on what the facts are, so when twitter does a fact check some people would disagree, what if it's a close call? I'm not going to agree or disagree with their assessme
10.
by reroute1 6y ago
The only person making useless posts here is you... I responded to this person directly to comment on their post and state my opinion, who TF are you? Did you actually just make a comment to say stop posting in aloop and add nothing to the
11.
by reroute1 6y ago
Of course I see comments and articles about it all the time, I do not understand it and think they are totally wrong. Like I said no good reason that I have seen The funny thing is Twitter gets roasted for taking the opposite stance... Ther
12.
by reroute1 6y ago
It's really not that obtuse, he wants the information and to decide for himself... Your way leaves a huge hole for someone to pull wool over your eyes
13.
by reroute1 6y ago
Yeah me too because unless mark Zuckerberg shot tear gas at you I still don't get it. You just sound really mad at FB and silicon valley for no good reason
14.
by reroute1 6y ago
I'm concerned for someone who has so much wrongly placed anger... dude you're all worked up about Facebook for no reason, get real they aren't the enemy
15.
by reroute1 6y ago
Analyzing dota2 match history and what heroes work in combination a la dotaplus
16.
by reroute1 6y ago
Actually the abstract points out that this hypothesis is one going against the largely held scientific view of biological factors and gender differences... A rebuttal a year later in the related section points out omissions from this paper
17.
by reroute1 6y ago
Yea maybe save it for when speech is actually a real issue and not over policing and treating it like it's your personal servant. Grow up and get over it
18.
by reroute1 6y ago
Regardless of disagreeing about the terminology or not (it's mostly a joke but I don't care), it's still a silly pursuit
19.
by reroute1 6y ago
Maybe we are? Suggesting the whole world stop doing this is silly bud
20.
by reroute1 6y ago
How is it nonsense though? You just saying it doesn't make it so sorry... It's a pretty obvious observation made over and over you are going to need to give some data or reasoning why this is wrong, because science and logic both
21.
by reroute1 6y ago
Actually it's pretty basic biology and psychology. What "conclusions" are disagreed? Can you really not see how this would apply in real life with personality differences? It seems obvious and intuitive not even mentioning th
22.
by reroute1 6y ago
"Centrist media" kind of took a dump on him... Why would he run to them? Is Joe Rogan not a centrist? He is self proclaimed liberal on most topics, right wing is a silly label
23.
by reroute1 6y ago
Less interested/"qualified" compared on average to males by virtue of their interests and biology not their intelligence. Ignoring this is like sticking your fingers in your ears to the argument How is the statement in a gene
24.
by reroute1 6y ago
Great don't trust him don't like him don't feel comfortable... That doesn't change the fact he posted biological truths did NOT say women can't be good engineers which is what you exactly try to project on him over
25.
by reroute1 6y ago
That's not what he said it's what you project and transform his arguments into. What he said was factual and his concerns were legit and the over reaction was hilarious
26.
by reroute1 6y ago
Sure there's lots of reasons to not use React and many places don't. Bad management/decision making is more to blame in this case than anything.
27.
by reroute1 6y ago
Django is a big framework, it isn't aimed at beginners.
28.
by reroute1 6y ago
Political crisis? Yeah I'll pass
29.
by reroute1 6y ago
You sound like you haven't competed for jobs very long
30.
by reroute1 6y ago
Not sure where you interviewed maybe it's not relevant, but a lot of jobs you will not always be in a position to do the work 100% isolated and by yourself and sometimes there will be other people in the room.

More ›