red_green_yell

9 ms·

1.
by red_green_yell 7d ago
There is a chrome extension that injects “respond in English” and “English [checkbox emoji]” to every query. This helps a lot but I still sometimes get Chinese responses. I have not had this issue via api on openrouter.
2.
by red_green_yell 8d ago
If you're smart enough to solve this Navier-Stokes problem, you're smart enough to read a TOS and recognize that OAI is a highly untrustworthy company. Putting cutting edge research that could lead to a $1M prize into a cloud LLM
3.
Stanley Zhong Gets Admissions Data Discovery in UW Suit with AI lawyer(foxnews.com)
3 points by red_green_yell 12d ago|1 comments
4.
by red_green_yell 12d ago
"With that ruling, we can now proceed into discovery, request internal documents, internal communication and, most importantly, admissions data," Nan (Stanley's father and Google manager) said. I think regardless of your poli
5.
by red_green_yell 21d ago
I think you are conflating "the best data we have" with "sufficient data to prove something". I agree with you that the best data we have is inconclusive. Which doesn't mean social media is totally safe. Also it doe
6.
by red_green_yell 29d ago
Please don't tell me that you think a 100% unverified statement from Anthropic is sufficient evidence when an equally unverified statement from OAI is obviously not? > I guess if I can't convince you of any of this, what would?
7.
by red_green_yell 29d ago
Clowns who think the white house is immune from alien laser beams are gonna be the death of us all...
8.
by red_green_yell 29d ago
Your argument is essentially: "I made a claim and presented extremely weak evidence (sci movie plots and unverified claims from ultra conflicted sources). You rejected this evidence as insufficient. Therefore no evidence will ever sati
9.
by red_green_yell 29d ago
What anyone paying attention can see is that scaling is obviously hitting diminishing returns. > The AI literally worked together hacked into another company and actively kept their actions hidden from humans for weeks. This sentence is
10.
by red_green_yell 29d ago
GLM 5.2 scored 77% on cyberbench vs Sol's 88%. GLM 5.2 is open weight and any hacker with a powerful enough machine can use it offensively. If Sol is supposedly world-ending-ly dangerous, shouldn't GLM 5.2 be 90% of world-ending-l
11.
by red_green_yell 29d ago
If these models are so dangerous, then why hasn't OAI or Anthropic shown them dangerously escaping sandboxes, nefariously coordinating with other escaped AIs, and skillfully hiding from human detection *in public* with full logs shared
12.
by red_green_yell 1mo ago
This is the right answer but the reason they can’t upload the scans is copyright law as demonstrated by Google having to settle with the publishers and allow them to remove their books and limit free access to 20% of text. The AI companies
13.
by red_green_yell 1mo ago
They are digesting it an incorporating into the weights. You won’t be able to get the exact page but you will (if the model is good) be able to get the knowledge out of it in a likely far more concise, relevant, and certainly more widely ac
14.
by red_green_yell 1mo ago
The gullibility of AGI-pilled folks regarding these "hacks" is just breathtaking. When OAI demonstrates these dangerous capabilities live in a public environment where security experts can see and verify what actually happened, th
15.
by red_green_yell 1mo ago
You are right to question that. I am basing that statement off of the many famous engineers that have recently left and were very highly paid. My guess is Google is ceding the frontier and the high salaries that go with it and letting Anthr
16.
by red_green_yell 1mo ago
Google has multiple massive cost advantages over OAI: TPUs, free access to massively valuable data (search index, gmail, maps reviews/PO/ navigation, youtube, android etc.), lower talent costs, lower training costs, lower distribu
17.
by red_green_yell 1mo ago
Don’t forget AirPods, Apple TV, and Apple Watch. They were not first but they are currently best. The Alexa thing and AVP are notable fails.
18.
by red_green_yell 2mo ago
The criticism isn't that they believe in safety too much. It's that they patently using safety as a red herring with the actual goal of regulating away competition that they know the cannot beat.
19.
by red_green_yell 2mo ago
OAI and Anthropic specifically are under intense pressure to compete. One form of competition could be to innovate. Another form would be regulatory capture. The former seems unlikely given how quickly open labs are catching up. The latter
20.
by red_green_yell 2mo ago
> we cannot currently disambiguate how easy it is to get close to the frontier in a vacuum. Whether open-weight labs can get to the frontier on their own is irrelevant IMO. Even if all R&D were to stop today it would take a decade at
21.
by red_green_yell 2mo ago
Why is it you are so quick to skip over whether "accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control" actually happens and instead jump to "regulate now"? 1000 employees of the anti-alien defense industry are telling
22.
by red_green_yell 2mo ago
These 1000 employees have generational wealth riding on the ability for their companies to IPO. They know that those IPOs won't happen if open weight models continue to kill their companies' profit margins. This is an obvious conf
23.
by red_green_yell 2mo ago
Employees inside frontier labs have the chance to make life changing money if they can make it to an IPO before the music stops. Have you considered that might be the reason they are so eager to claim "ai dangerous - regulate ai"?
24.
by red_green_yell 2mo ago
It sounds like your claim is "AI is a force multiplier, therefore it is dangerous and must be regulated." Not trying to strawman - I read your comment twice and I think that's what you're saying. By that logic Excel, the
25.
by red_green_yell 2mo ago
The only thing it might accomplish is allowing OpenAI / Anthropic to squeak out an IPO before the market realizes AI will become a commodity and the massive profits these companies are promising will never materialize. They aren't
26.
by red_green_yell 2mo ago
If the accuracy of your biology claim is "hard to say" then why would pushback be self-evidently myopic? You and others are making a claim about LLMs enabling biological dangers. Some people disagree with you, pointing out that th
27.
by red_green_yell 2mo ago
See printing press and internet!
28.
by red_green_yell 2mo ago
I think this is a spot on analogy and would two more: the hand wringing over the release of the printing press and the internet. In both cases the people in power were terrified that the masses would use their newfound power to do dangerous
29.
by red_green_yell 2mo ago
Are they lazy dismissals? Or a simple observation that LLM scaling is hitting diminishing returns way way short of AGI. If the claim is (1) AGI coming and (2) we should so something about AGI, wouldn't it be smart to confirm (1) before