Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rayvy
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
rayvy
7y ago
> Wasn't the question about using them for auth, not application state? Whether a user is auth'd or not can indeed be a form of application state
2.
▲
by
rayvy
7y ago
> It feels dreary because you feel you have nothing left to strive for because you're only measuring your progress by your salary This. In your post you mentioned nothing but salary. Sadly I think you might find the hard way that th
3.
▲
by
rayvy
7y ago
I think this write up is very fair for a solid engineering team. Is it groundbreaking and eye opening? Absolutely not, I’d say the most “hmm I didn’t know that” part of the entire thing was the part about R-Trees and S2. Is that bad? Absolu
4.
▲
by
rayvy
7y ago
That's cute ;)
5.
▲
by
rayvy
7y ago
P2P is for decentralization. Why would a centralized entity want to implement a decentralized service when they can create a centralized version of that same service faster, easier, and cheaper? P2P is _hard_ with a capital H.
6.
▲
by
rayvy
7y ago
Your comment is posted as a matter of fact, but includes no sources/citations
7.
▲
Ask HN: What Is This “New Google Search Implementation” PR About?
3 points
by
rayvy
7y ago
|
2 comments
8.
▲
by
rayvy
7y ago
This is kind’ve a bait question. I mean the “no duh” answer (as others have already mentioned) is “whichever you are most comfortable with”. I’m confused as to what other answer you could want
9.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
Seconded. Would also love to know these things. Side note: Would definitely change the title as it comes across a bit...baity.
10.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
Gonna just chime in and mention Yahoo for Hadoop (yes I know Big Table was Google), and Zookeeper. Great tech started at Yahoo, but they didn’t (unlike today) make too much of a fuss/self-pat-on-the-back about it
11.
▲
The Fed Has Given MMT Proponents Ample Ammunition
(bloomberg.com)
2 points
by
rayvy
8y ago
|
0 comments
12.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
Welcome to LA! (Well, when you get here) Qualifier: been here for about 2.5 years and just got a new position at a startup after 2.5 years at [big_adtech_co] 1. Angelist.co for startups 2. Bultinla.com for startups (though anglelist is bet
13.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
I think you’ve mentioned a HUGE part of the interview process that interviewers forget: you only have 60 mins. 45 mins if you leave time for questions (which you always should). It’s an incredibly difficult task, and deserves significant ef
14.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
This is a decent start, but then again remember you only have 60 minutes. And what might seem relatively easy to you, might not be so easy to someone with a time limit (60 mins), and pressure (trying to get a job you want).
15.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
By "spent more money on congress people" @psadauskas is not simply just referring to "who spent more money last year", he's implying that the foothole that a Comcast or a Verizon has in the capitol goes much furth
16.
▲
Ask HN: How `private` will the Oculus Quest be?
6 points
by
rayvy
8y ago
|
1 comments
17.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
> Most rank-and-file joining one of these cos in the last 4 years or so will be lucky to net $1-2m pre-tax Yea I'm confused as to where all these splurge-happy millionaires the article mentions will come from. There will definitely
18.
▲
Ask HN: Anyone Using Google's “Speech-to-Text” Service?
1 points
by
rayvy
8y ago
|
1 comments
19.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
This type of disclosure is quite literally standard in almost every type of public company financial disclosure. Surprised this made it to the HN front page
20.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
> You diversify to retain or safeguard wealth, you concentrate to first create wealth. That'll do it
21.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
Funny you mention this, I was just reading [1]this article related to the quote on "putting your eggs in one basket". Conventional wisdom says "diversify". However, I'm of the belief that you'll need high risk
22.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
I mean seriously though. I love how various media platforms ALWAYS talk about Bitcoin as a failure. What? But then again, they only think of “success” as some idea cut from the same cloth as current capitalist alternatives - the very altern
23.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
I'll start the discussion by just pointing out how Bloomberg and the NYT absolutely love to talk about China being a surveillance state, but hardly ever talk about the surveillance state that we live in here in the US (relative to
24.
▲
Limiting Your Digital Footprints in a Surveillance State
(nytimes.com)
19 points
by
rayvy
8y ago
|
2 comments
25.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
Any more details (that you're willing to share) on this? You mentioned they're only the "Head of HR", but you say you were a core product dev (senior by the timeline you give). Did you accept underpay because you were
26.
▲
Ask HN: Can My Landlord Give Everyone the Same Key?
1 points
by
rayvy
8y ago
|
2 comments
27.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
Keep in mind that the EOS ecosystem extends far beyond downloading a CLI client/etc. EOS Lynx[1] is a wonderful example of a decentralized wallet that has abstracted layers away to the point where it looks/feels/acts like a &
28.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
> Open standards and interoperability made public networks more useful, but now that the networks are in place, and access is ubiquitous, walled gardens can spring up and dominate MUCH faster than distributed protocols. And personally, h
29.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
I wouldn't say its so much the UX. The UX even on some crypto projects is just fine (see some EOS projects, apps, and dApps). The problem I see is that what incentive do end users have to use crypto/privacy/blockchain/wh
30.
▲
by
rayvy
8y ago
It's pretty well known that these BigCorp crypto/blockchain plays are just smoke and mirrors. There is no actual differential value gained here (unless as @dwiel says,they get some sort of loophole crypto tax break). It's a b
More ›