ranyume

9 ms·

1.
by ranyume 10d ago
Check the history of the different communist movements. Maybe an entrypoint would be this: today there is the Fourth International. The USSR was born out of the Third International with Lenin, and the Fourth International opposed/oppos
2.
by ranyume 10d ago
It's very clear you do not have a grasp of Marxism or Communism. You'd know that the worker class is only one.
3.
by ranyume 10d ago
I don't remember any LGBTQI+ wars inside my house either, but they're respected here. That's strange isn't it?
4.
by ranyume 10d ago
I have not glorified violence nor called to do violence to anyone. You seems to have misunderstood: I wish for violence to stop. It was always the oppressed's blood that was spilled by the establishment through police force every time
5.
by ranyume 10d ago
How do you think LGBTQI+ rights came exist? It was not a pretty, blood-free, submissive process. And we're still far from LGBTQI+ rights being normalized. How about workers rights? Slavery? Any progress that you'd think of as civi
6.
by ranyume 10d ago
> And none of that is illegal... At least not in any civilised society I mean, the capitalist system is a barbaric system with defenders that do make opposition illegal...
7.
by ranyume 12d ago
Deadlifting 500kg is not a form of intelligence (or it could be under certain scenarios). I carefully chose specific tasks for my comment, because those tasks do reflect a kind of intelligence that's not measured by IQ. I think the key
8.
by ranyume 13d ago
I said it's a bad measure of intelligence and it seems that we agree.
9.
by ranyume 13d ago
> No, it is just because they have difficulties at the bench. I'll put it in another way. A "gifted kid" can be measured incredibly well on an IQ test, but fail miserably at incredibly normal but very difficult tasks such
10.
by ranyume 13d ago
But we do know they're "intelligent" and also smart in an important capacity. So how gives we don't measure them by IQ? Because the IQ is not a good measure of intelligence or smarts.
11.
by ranyume 13d ago
Doesn't "saturated" mean that essentially there won't be any more progress in the benchmarch? Also of note is that two of your points only mean something on an occidental capitalist system.
12.
by ranyume 13d ago
Give away access to the model and go ask people from time to time if the model was of use to the person and if they were able to make the model work with them.
13.
by ranyume 13d ago
I don't think IQ is a good measure for intelligence at all. Neither dolphins or octopuses can solve IQ tests.
14.
by ranyume 13d ago
It's interesting that you said "agi god". Because a god, something that shouldn't be questioned is true and provides guidance/certainty, is actually what powerful people are after as well as many other people.
15.
by ranyume 1mo ago
Around 10 minutes.
16.
by ranyume 2mo ago
There are only two industries left in america.
17.
by ranyume 2mo ago
Hobbes's Leviathan wants to have a call with you.
18.
by ranyume 2mo ago
So it's a fan-fiction?
19.
by ranyume 2mo ago
You are absolutely right!
20.
by ranyume 2mo ago
This is true but I also find the opposite true: the model is highly dependent on the input/prompt, to the point that it can't think beyond it or about it.
21.
by ranyume 3mo ago
Your solution is to fire CEOs, shareholders and only make employee-owned businesses? I mean I'm on board.
22.
by ranyume 3mo ago
If.. the AI seeks political asylum in Tokyo?
23.
by ranyume 3mo ago
Note that it says "start plan" without a price tag. The price tag for the other plan is the one on the page. I don't know what it is because I haven't set up an account to use it, I set up a custom provider in the app. T
24.
by ranyume 3mo ago
When running the app, it actually tells you what the base usages are, but the name of the plans are different from the page. It reads: Start plan: 5 Million tokens a day (GLM-5.2 3M, GLM-5 Turbo 2M) For individuals: (+150% quota) $18.00USD+
25.
by ranyume 3mo ago
It's good that I don't have any reason to go to the US.
26.
by ranyume 3mo ago
AI mass surveillance is another. The powerful are just ceasing opportunities to accumulate power and capital, seeing that right now it is not good enough for them.
27.
by ranyume 3mo ago
> While obviously requiring real-world ID verification will reduce privacy, is there really any actual privacy left on today's internet? Privacy is not an on and off switch or an all or nothing. You have to defend the privacy you ha
28.
by ranyume 3mo ago
What do you mean? My deepseek subscription got really cheap.
29.
by ranyume 3mo ago
> Can you think of many examples of a SaaS provider who regularly keeps old versions of a product around for customers to use? Sure. Blender and Ubuntu offer long-lived old versions of their software that get regular fixes.
30.
by ranyume 3mo ago
The CCP would never dream of giving the state's control to tech CEOs.

More ›