randomdata

10 ms·

331.
by randomdata 2y ago
When the zero interest rates left, at least.
332.
by randomdata 2y ago
now do "flammable" and "inflammable"!
333.
by randomdata 2y ago
It did a better job in explaining that there is ambiguity in the question, but still went ahead with an arbitrary assumption in order to answer it. I think it is fair to say it is right, but so was the other attempt. Each interpretation is
334.
by randomdata 2y ago
You don't know because he did not say. He said 20 years, which are more than a few.
335.
by randomdata 2y ago
Implying there isn’t a market for chickens that are chicks? Clearly there is. The question literally states that the farmer bought chicks, so logically they could go back on the market. They don’t need to be older. The AI got it right.
336.
by randomdata 2y ago
He doesn’t speak to any particular split. The government forces the private sector to do pointless work as much or more.
337.
by randomdata 2y ago
It was the teachers themselves who told me, but sage advice in general. You're quite right that teaching does tend to an attract a crowd that are out to lunch. Still, the portfolio is public knowledge, so we can also verify what they s
338.
by randomdata 2y ago
Crop insurance is partially subsidized, but I am personally not a buyer. What fun is gambling if you’re going to insure the gamble? But I could theoretically benefit from that, to be sure. The farm property tax rate is lower than the commer
339.
by randomdata 2y ago
No need to draw on past experience. I'm watching it unfold right here. Quite hilarious.
340.
by randomdata 2y ago
Crop insurance, even of the subsidized variety, could refer to all kinds of different systems. But, I'll assume that which is under the USDA RMA. You don't consider any of the following to be fruit? Apples, Apricots (Fresh, Proces
341.
by randomdata 2y ago
Hinton says that superintelligence is still 20 years away, and even then he only gives his prediction a 50% chance. A far cry from the few year claim. You must be doing that "strawberry" thing again? To us humans, A-l-t-m-a-n is n
342.
by randomdata 2y ago
> I like to have a collection of tools and parts as well as a collection of books. But, with respect to the parent, would it matter if you didn't own them? What if, say, tools, parts, and books belonged to the land? There for you
343.
by randomdata 2y ago
Does anyone have a differing opinion? I expect there is good reason they have never been compared. Your opinion is noted, I guess, but what lead you to think it was worth sharing?
344.
by randomdata 2y ago
You're assuming that people can't get along. Is there some reason the BBC and archive.org can't work together to satisfy both of their wants and needs?
345.
by randomdata 2y ago
> so removing competition ruins the sport But now you're back to the original, curiously unanswered, question: Is there really that much gambling going on in the "little leagues"? If not, for what reason do you think the
346.
by randomdata 2y ago
I'm not sure sitting in a comfortable air conditioned cab is all that much effort. It is fun! But as we're on the precipice of it going the way of full automation removing even that minimal effort, just how low effort is your bar?
347.
by randomdata 2y ago
Are you trying to tell us that you think cryptocurrencies and venture capital fit the legal gambling definition, or are you trying to tell us that you didn't bother to understand the context under which the comment was posted? Either w
348.
by randomdata 2y ago
> On the far other end of the spectrum is the slot machine - you pull a lever and wait. In the narrowest view, sure. But, for example, not all casinos, hell not even all machines in the same casino, offer the same odds. What about the
349.
by randomdata 2y ago
> Huh. What do you mean by “sake of sport”…? Like, to see who’s the strongest? Okay, sure, let's say there is a "who's the strongest competition". Let's be more specific and say it is a professional arm wrestli
350.
by randomdata 2y ago
Rigged? No, probably not – at least not where driven by gambling, but professional sports leagues aren't shy about adjusting rules to make the game more enjoyable to watch, even if not what is best for the sport for the sake of sport.
351.
by randomdata 2y ago
> We would improve society if we agreed that all gambling is bad. As a professional gambler (aka farmer) I understand I am biased, but I have a hard time squaring that society would improve if we all agreed my gambling habit is bad. Es
352.
by randomdata 2y ago
> But a much easier argument against sports betting is that it ruins the sports. Is there really that much betting going on in the "little leagues"? Professional sports are already and have always been ruined as they, by thei
353.
by randomdata 2y ago
Is it? The role of government is to clean up individuals who cause trouble for the population at large. Poor people who trade their grocery budget for gambling undeniably cause trouble for a population. Do rich people who trade their luxury
354.
by randomdata 2y ago
> Lottos just trick the people with less money into paying more taxes on the hopes of "winning it big!" How do you explain the school teacher spending $200 per week, then? The teachers here collectively own one of the world&#
355.
by randomdata 2y ago
> The latter isn't even much cheaper. For the customer, perhaps. Higher margin, though, so the business can survive with fewer customers. I think it is pretty clear that "high class" places attract more restaurant traffi
356.
by randomdata 2y ago
> It's almost like the poor lifestyle choice they made was living in a rural area It is more that the poor lifestyle choices were already made, so it is most convenient to live in a rural area where there isn't as much social
357.
by randomdata 2y ago
This... is the 1972 Riche C
358.
by randomdata 2y ago
Are these autistics/savants actually accessing some kind of different layer, or is it, like the earlier comment suggests, that they've tuned/shaped/however to describe it their brain in a different way? It seems reasonab
359.
by randomdata 2y ago
> it wasn't saying anything concrete (talk to each other, collaborate, be flexible, react to reality etc.) No, there is something concrete there: No managers. Traditionally those would be the concern of the manager. Agile says it
360.
by randomdata 2y ago
"Waterfall" is pretty well conceived, to be fair. It only gets a bad rap because people stop reading after the first paragraph. The following paragraphs, what everyone misses, essentially say "but that is not enough, you also

More ›