randomdata

10 ms·

361.
by randomdata 2y ago
Again, Agile has no specific leadership. It is a model, for lack of a better word, for self-organizing teams where all participants are the same as all others. It is lead by the shared collective of all taking part. That's its while de
362.
by randomdata 2y ago
To be fair, modern university was originally sold on the idea of getting more people into university research labs where they could work to develop and take ownership of new capital. This is where the idea that you will make more money if y
363.
by randomdata 2y ago
I am under the impression that Jira is a really poorly designed text editor, with the addition of boxes that can be dragged around to serve as a fidget toy for those who have nothing better to do.
364.
by randomdata 2y ago
> not feasible in the majority of cases. Was it supposed to be? The Twelve Principles makes it very clear that you need extra special people to have any chance. It was clearly never meant for everyone. It literally says so. Perhaps
365.
by randomdata 2y ago
Iterative development is Royce's "Waterfall" model. It long predates Agile. Agile is about eliminating management in favour of self-organizing teams. Hence how we ended up with all these tools (standups, Jira, etc.) to try an
366.
by randomdata 2y ago
No. Had you asked for it to spell "strawberry", though...
367.
by randomdata 2y ago
AGI doesn't arrive until humans are content to allow computers to determine what AGI is.
368.
by randomdata 2y ago
Sorry, referring to the internet as "education" is a new one to me. I agree, that is the point of the internet. I thought you were talking about formal education.
369.
by randomdata 2y ago
> In college/university, you learn how to think. I learned how to think on the farm after school. You don't have much choice but to when the shit gets real. Is the rise in college attainment directly a result of most kids no
370.
by randomdata 2y ago
> The point is to learn. If you've ever been around a growing baby, you'll have noticed that learning happens naturally. And if you have kept watching them as they continue on their life journey, you'll have noticed that
371.
by randomdata 2y ago
> If AI replaces education, why should taxpayers keep footing the bill for schools? The parent claims that AI will replace human teachers, not education. If we accept that state-funded education is worthwhile now, why would it stop bei
372.
by randomdata 2y ago
Why would it be strange? We recognized that we were in an information economy 50-plus years ago, and were quite proud of it (at least back then). It turns out people don't buy information to stick in their storage locker. Without atten
373.
by randomdata 2y ago
Isn't the implication here that it is happening externally? To stick with your analogy, imagine something in the environment is altering the perception of taste. The blame is not being placed on the customer or the chef, but on the env
374.
by randomdata 2y ago
That's what the parent is saying. If you are in school to try and be a more well rounded person, but then rely on tools like ChatGPT to do it for you, then the only loss is yours. Which then questions, who cares? Why not let you waste
375.
by randomdata 2y ago
I'm told there is a growing trend of men wearing "women's" clothing. Perhaps the eventual outcome is that we will all wear the same thing (whatever women consider to be fashionable)?
376.
by randomdata 2y ago
Groceries seem quite unusual for a department store, with their focus on quality and luxury (or at least the illusion of), and food being commoditized. Are you, perhaps, thinking of discount department stores? Groceries are quite commonly f
377.
by randomdata 2y ago
> 30% is way too high. It is not something to strive for. It is offered as a warning. Like how the US suggests 50 mSv/year for occupational radiation exposure. That doesn't mean you should go out and purposefully expose yours
378.
by randomdata 2y ago
Why wouldn't your friends and family also live in the ideal city? What is the ideal city lacking that sees you need to travel for other reasons? Don't get hung up imagining the shitty cities of today, except without cars, actually
379.
by randomdata 2y ago
A decent rule if considered in a vacuum, but perhaps you missed some necessary context related to this particular discussion? > - they want to save money training the employees,
380.
by randomdata 2y ago
Sure, let us know when you are ready. None of this explains the car ban. Yeah, make cites more walkable. That's just logical. These wannabe rural areas we call cities today are hilariously nonsensical. But you don't need to ban ca
381.
by randomdata 2y ago
Technically. What would be the point of said exception, though? If personal vehicle use is exchanged for taxis, you will still have more or less the same number of cars on the road, doing nothing to solve the apparent problem. I mean, you c
382.
by randomdata 2y ago
If you watch film of early cars, people still happily walked amongst them. The problem isn't so much with cars themselves, but with increasingly impatient people; the intensifying rat race.
383.
by randomdata 2y ago
Why is it not realistic? If you feel the need to leave, is it really the ideal city? It seems that you're hung up on imagining the shitty cities of today, except without cars, not anything resembling an ideal city.
384.
by randomdata 2y ago
So she establishes a hypothesis (draws a graph or picks a point to make) and then tests it through experimentation (looks for data to support the hypothesis)? Isn't that just the scientific method worded another way?
385.
by randomdata 2y ago
> - they want to save money training the employees, So what you're saying is that they push for STEM education to make their employees more replaceable...?
386.
by randomdata 2y ago
If public transportation is beneficial to a city, you've already missed the ideal mark by a long shot. The ideal city has no need for movement of people over distances where mechanical movement is the only practical option.
387.
by randomdata 2y ago
Right, understood that the standup was conceived under XP, which is a framework for operating self-organizing teams without managers, and it is likely you need that collaboration when you have no mangers. But when was the last time you saw
388.
by randomdata 2y ago
I mean, sure, outside of managers, there is no reason for anyone to care. That's literally why the developers have managers working for them: To have someone keep tabs on what is going on so they don't have to. But I mean with res
389.
by randomdata 2y ago
I was around (working remotely, even) before anyone had ever heard of standups. Back then, developers were excited enough about their work that they would share what they were working on by their own accord. How did we get to the point whe
390.
by randomdata 2y ago
You're really speaking about documentation quality, though. The most horribly written code ever written can still do a good job of documenting what the "if" does. I think the real takeaway here is that code quality doesn&#x27

More ›