qkqk

7 ms·

1.
by qkqk 5y ago
The vertical dividers should just be CSS anyway
2.
by qkqk 5y ago
> This is just harrassment [sic] against a right-wing media site Is Tesla a right-wing media site too? Vizio? Or did you just construct a narrative without knowing history? https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2019/
3.
by qkqk 5y ago
That's about 22.5% of the country, not half.
4.
by qkqk 5y ago
> That's why I used the word "sought" Trump sought to increase the legal responsibility of social media companies for what their users say, which would in effect silence and cancel users. Coincidentally right after Twitter
5.
by qkqk 5y ago
> making the source code public (which AGPL does not require) That is completely false. If you read the article or the license before commenting you will understand why. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html#
6.
by qkqk 5y ago
> How could they have 'broke' the rules [sic] By violating the terms of the license. They have 30 days to remedy the violation, or their rights in the software are permanently terminated > and as far as I could tell, no one
7.
by qkqk 5y ago
If you'd heard about it, you wouldn't need someone else to find cites or links, I'm not that gullible. > Did not create new law Right, it had no effect, just more signalling from Trump. He sought to increase the legal re
8.
by qkqk 5y ago
You'd never even heard of the EO before today, so I understand why you're confused. Nothing ever went into effect, it would have run afoul of the First Amendment, and it made demands US gov agencies that are statutorily outside
9.
by qkqk 5y ago
It made major headlines, I'm surprised you're so far out of the loop you never heard about it. The link to a Google search I provided for you makes it easy to find the EO: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presi
10.
by qkqk 5y ago
Trump sought to increase the legal responsibility of social media companies for what their users say, repealing protections under Section 230, thereby exposing them to lawsuits, which would in effect silence and cancel users.
11.
by qkqk 5y ago
It did say the beta was public "Truth Social hasn’t officially launched. But users could access a test version of the platform" > if you run AGPL code on a home server for personal use and someone hacks in No one hacked in [1
12.
by qkqk 5y ago
You've made a lot of comments about "blacks" for someone who doesn't "give a flying rat"
13.
by qkqk 5y ago
That or the art director thought it communicated the brand effectively. > the literal opposite of diversity Were you worried we'd think it was the figurative opposite if you didn't say "literal?"
14.
by qkqk 5y ago
And the reply in the other direction mentions Hunter Biden. I don't understand why! (We're still pretending we don't know that people are insinuating Snopes has a liberal bias right?) If Trump makes a huge number of false sta
15.
by qkqk 5y ago
Huh, the article where they say "Trump did not explicitly tell people to 'storm' or 'breach' or 'break into' the Capitol" and instead “peacefully and patriotically” march does't fit the mold of &
16.
by qkqk 5y ago
That is false, and I linked to a new, different article, not a "retconned" one. They didn't change their stance, they criticize those that do, and reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence. As you sai
17.
by qkqk 5y ago
Right, you can tell by the publication date (it's in the URL), why I say "they reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence." What you said is not true, and their position hasn't shifted (they'
18.
by qkqk 5y ago
> the logical fallacies are hurting my brain Like your "they don't omit references ever " straw man? "This one case" meaning one of the most significant and contested events of the US election? Surely their fa
19.
by qkqk 5y ago
Snopes didn't, they reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence. Which presumably you agree with...oops! [1] Back on topic: why didn't they omit those references and reasoning regarding the Capitol?! https:
20.
by qkqk 5y ago
Remind me of their narrative again? They say that > "Trump did not explicitly tell people to 'storm' or 'breach' or 'break into' the [US] Capitol." and included the reasoning that > the presid
21.
by qkqk 5y ago
Really? So you think Trump was wearing his pants backwards at this rally? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-wear-pants-backwards... Snopes says he wasn't , and shows evidence why. That's just "pur
22.
by qkqk 5y ago
That or brand managers want branding. Do you have real-world examples of the hypothetical you invented?
23.
by qkqk 5y ago
Branding! And licensing costs, design, UI consistency, obvious reasons covered by Apple and Google when they updated their platforms to use them.
24.
by qkqk 5y ago
Nope, but major brands benefit from their own typeface in numerous ways, so Twitter may need their own typeface.
25.
by qkqk 5y ago
Then the money Google saves on HVAC, restrooms, facilities, support staff and office space should be going directly into the pockets of the employees that convert to fulltime remote, right? > Your compensation is made up of what the comp
26.
by qkqk 5y ago
No, of course, not, grid is a fundamental structure in graphic design. It will vary on the design of course, but https://gridless.design uses a design grid for a very clear purpose. The most interesting question being asked is
27.
by qkqk 5y ago
If you read more than the headline it might better your understanding. Racism is the belief that different races are distinctly inferior or superior to one another. [1] I don't see anything in the author's post or the product that
28.
by qkqk 5y ago
Why does a USB C port mean you don't need ADB or help with a cracked screen?