5 ms·

Really? So you think Trump was wearing his pants backwards at this rally? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-wear-pants-backwards/ https://www.snopes.com/

by qkqk 5y ago

Really? So you think Trump was wearing his pants backwards at this rally? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-wear-pants-backwards/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-wear-pants-backwards... Snopes says he wasn't, and shows evidence why. That's just "pure, unadulterated bias" though, right? His pants are on backwards? Otherwise "I see Snopes as pure, unadulterated bias" would be such a broad generalization it's meaningless!

TheTester 5y ago
Bias is definitely not the same the same as actually lying and even though snipes lies every once in a while it is mostly just biased
SV_BubbleTime 5y ago
Your argument that because a known biased “fact checker” chose not to pounce on Trump for one absolutely stupid Reddit-style hive-mind circle-jerk, they are a bastion of impartial fourth estate in a significant number of articles? You may have poor judgment when it comes to outlying events fitting in a trend.