presumably

5 ms·

1.
by presumably 6y ago
There are actually several (published and non-published) ways to exploit that type of configuration, here is one example: https://samy.pl/slipstream/
2.
by presumably 6y ago
Seems to be listed on the site: https://devgarden.macalester.edu/projects/1
3.
by presumably 6y ago
There is only a single "archive" that does not allow access to Cloudflare DNS users - not many. It is also exceedingly unlikely that you have greater density of anycast PoPs than Cloudflare's 200+. In your case, you have zero
4.
by presumably 6y ago
What you're claiming is false. Cloudflare has over 200 PoPs; in your own name servers, you can use the Cloudflare Resolver's IP (which will be a "close to the user" IP, not 1.1.1.1) to do geotargeting and serve from your
5.
by presumably 6y ago
What’s not reasonable about TiDB?
6.
by presumably 6y ago
For hosting, I’d suggest to look at hosting providers rather than VPN providers. Here’s one: https://freerangecloud.com/cart.php?gid=11 Cloudflare’s Argo Tunnel is another great option.
7.
by presumably 6y ago
> As long as a third party central authority controls our money system, we will always be subject to the whims of the few. Bitcoin is helping to liberate us and it’s absolutely working. A bold claim without evidence. In fact, the opposit
8.
by presumably 6y ago
SARS had escaped no less than 4 times from Chinese labs[1]. It’s not implausible at all that coronaviruses have a history of escaping Chinese labs. Meanwhile, this[2] is a terrible source but some of the info can easily be verified. We know
9.
by presumably 6y ago
There is no question that it was a real problem, details available in the linked post: https://objective-see.com/blog/blog_0x56.html The only question is different interpretations of “fake”: it is a real system dialogu
10.
by presumably 6y ago
Clinton: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_National_Stockpile Republican ideology is abhorrent; one doesn’t have to be part of the Democratic Party to recognize that. https://www.theatlantic.com/i
11.
by presumably 6y ago
Google is great at security. Privacy, ... not so great.
12.
by presumably 6y ago
That article is incredibly misleading in what it leaves out: by using same logic, our existing CA system is equally a “backdoor”. We have certificate transparency to help address that, and were DANE to be in actual use similar systems would
13.
by presumably 6y ago
He owns the rights to the pictures he takes. No purchase necessary. Especially in the context of wildlife, there are no human subjects to cloud the issue.
14.
by presumably 6y ago
Your [18] is a 404. Would like to hear more on your allegation regarding DANE.
15.
by presumably 6y ago
Great post, I especially appreciated the extra detail on generating the gifs for the post at the end. Thank you.
16.
by presumably 6y ago
There is no need for such facetious argument. Your post is strikingly similar to a modern “let them eat cake”. What does your idea of economic theory suggest for the masses living paycheck to paycheck due to ever increasing wealth inequalit
17.
by presumably 6y ago
Yes, absolutely. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21992491
18.
by presumably 7y ago
One of the core, fundamental concepts in Computer Science is composition. We are all standing on the shoulders of giants, building on the work of those who came before us. Therefore, to the greatest extent possible, our work should be avail
19.
by presumably 7y ago
https://sci-hub.se/downloads/2019-12-06/f645/10.1038@s41370-... > “ Our study was conducted at one U.S. university, which may limit generalizability.“
20.
by presumably 7y ago
Please respond to the actual contents of my post, and not a strawman version of it. I’m saying what I said, nothing more. > Software absolutely can and does lead to unintended outcomes, else there would be no bugs. Edit: also see this:
21.
by presumably 7y ago
> "unintentional" is a straight up lie based on how software works This is a very dangerous statement to make. Large systems are not like hackathon projects where you might understand and hold the entire scope and flow in your
22.
by presumably 7y ago
s/g\//g#/ assets/example.png#LEHV6nWB2yk8pyoJadR*.7kCMdnj assets/example.jpg#LEHV6nWB2yk8pyoJadR*.7kCMdnj No need to send the extra data to the server for each request.
23.
by presumably 7y ago
For (2), you may find the section 'Other useful autocomplete values' from this article helpful: https://www.twilio.com/blog/html-attributes-two-factor-authe... Discussed on HN: https://news.ycombin
24.
by presumably 7y ago
In that recommendation, they provide clear and easy to follow instructions for doing the checksum verification manually before applying the update. > Compare both checksums and, if matching, proceed with installing the package
25.
by presumably 7y ago
Requiring the attacker to be active to view traffic, rather than passive (broadcasting it openly) is a very real security improvement.
26.
by presumably 7y ago
What will your company do for California users, and other states as they adopt similar privacy laws following the success of the GDPR?
27.
by presumably 7y ago
> In this particular cooperative, if we’re successful, the members are every .org registrant, which means 10 million members. We’d need to get five million and one of them to agree, to change the articles. Okay, so... what is their plan
28.
by presumably 7y ago
I don’t understand the relevance of that argument in this context. Computers can cut ads that do tracking out of the page with the same effort they can cut out anything else from the page. The difference is that ads without tracking remove
29.
by presumably 7y ago
> The advice to use the text only versions for NPR and CNN is solid advice. Is it? https://text.npr.org/ You can access some 10 stories, not much more. There is no apparent functionality beyond that. At least for NPR, th
30.
by presumably 7y ago
That sounds an awful lot like how ads in newspapers used to work... you put the ads in the paper, and whoever reads the paper sees the ads. So why do we let people tell us it can’t be done on the internet?

More ›